Content deleted Content added
Citation bot (talk | contribs) Alter: pages. Add: s2cid. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Whoop whoop pull up | #UCB_webform 3002/3592 |
m →Audience and reception: lk Exercise (mathematics) |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{Short description|Maths textbook}}
{{about|the book|the area of mathematics|complex geometry}}
{{italic title}}
[[File:Geometry of Complex Numbers.jpg|thumb|1979 edition]]
'''''Geometry of Complex Numbers
==Topics==
The book is divided into three chapters, corresponding to the three parts of its subtitle: circle geometry, [[Möbius transformation]]s, and non-Euclidean geometry. Each of these is further divided into sections (which in other books would be called chapters) and sub-sections. An underlying theme of the book is the representation of the [[Euclidean plane]] as the [[Complex plane|plane of complex number]]s, and the use of [[complex
The chapter on circles covers the [[analytic geometry]] of circles in the complex plane.{{r|monk}} It describes the representation of circles by <math>2\times 2</math> [[Hermitian matrix|Hermitian matrices]],{{r|goodman|crowe}} the [[Inversive geometry|inversion of circles]], [[stereographic projection]], [[Apollonian circles|pencils of circles]] (certain one-parameter families of circles) and their two-parameter analogue, bundles of circles, and the [[cross-ratio]] of four complex numbers.{{r|goodman}}
Line 18 ⟶ 19:
==Audience and reception==
''Geometry of Complex Numbers'' is written for advanced undergraduates{{r|eves}}
and its many
By the time of his 2015 review, Mark Hunacek wrote that "the book has a decidedly old-fashioned vibe" making it more difficult to read, and that the dated selection of topics made it unlikely to be usable as the main text for a course.{{r|hunacek}} Reviewer R. P. Burn shares Hunacek's concerns about readability, and also complains that Schwerdtfeger "consistently lets geometrical interpretation follow algebraic proof, rather than allowing geometry to play a motivating role".{{r|burn}} Nevertheless Hunacek repeats Goodman's and Eves's recommendation for its use "as supplemental reading in a course on complex analysis",{{r|hunacek}} and Burn concludes that "the republication is welcome".{{r|burn}}
|