Static forces and virtual-particle exchange: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 14:11, 16 August 2022

Latest revision as of 00:49, 8 July 2024

(8 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)

Line 1:

{{Use American English|date = February 2019}}

{{Short description|Physical interaction in post-classical physics}}

{{Use American English|date = February 2019}}

'''Static force fields''' are fields, such as a simple [[Electric field|electric]], [[Magnetic field|magnetic]] or [[gravitational field]]s, that exist without excitations. The [[Perturbation theory (quantum mechanics)|most common approximation method]] that physicists use for [[Scattering theory|scattering calculations]] can be interpreted as static forces arising from the interactions between two bodies mediated by '''[[virtual particle]]s''', particles that exist for only a short time determined by the [[uncertainty principle]].<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Jaeger|first1=Gregg|title=Are virtual particles less real?| journal=Entropy |volume=21 |issue=2|page=141|date=2019|doi=10.3390/e21020141|pmid=33266857 |pmc=7514619 |bibcode=2019Entrp..21..141J|doi-access=free}}</ref> The virtual particles, also known as [[force carrier]]s, are [[boson]]s, with different bosons associated with each force.<ref name="Zee">{{cite book | first = A. | last = Zee | title=Quantum Field Theory in a Nutshell| publisher= Princeton University| year=2003 | isbn=0-691-01019-6}}</ref>{{rp|pp=16–37}}

The virtual-particle description of static forces is capable of identifying the spatial form of the forces, such as the inverse-square behavior in [[Newton's law of universal gravitation]] and in [[Coulomb's law]]. It is also able to predict whether the forces are attractive or repulsive for like bodies.

Line 7:

The [[path integral formulation]] is the natural language for describing force carriers. This article uses the path integral formulation to describe the force carriers for [[Spin (physics)|spin]] 0, 1, and 2 fields. [[Pion]]s, [[photon]]s, and [[graviton]]s fall into these respective categories.

There are limits to the validity of the virtual particle picture. The virtual-particle formulation is derived from a method known as [[perturbation theory]] which is an approximation assuming interactions are not too strong, and was intended for scattering problems, not bound states such as atoms. For the strong force binding [[quark]]s into [[nucleon]]s at low energies, perturbation theory has never been shown to yield results in accord with experiments,<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.hep.phy.cam.ac.uk/theory/research/hadronic.html |title=ArchivedHigh copyEnergy Physics Group - Hadronic Physics |accessdate=2010-08-31 |url-status=dead |archiveurl=https://web.archive.org/web/20110717002648/http://www.hep.phy.cam.ac.uk/theory/research/hadronic.html |archivedate=2011-07-17 }}</ref> thus, the validity of the "force-mediating particle" picture is questionable. Similarly, for [[bound state]]s the method fails.<ref>{{cite web| url=http://galileo.phys.virginia.edu/classes/752.mf1i.spring03/Time_Ind_PT.htm|title=Time-Independent Perturbation Theory| work=virginia.edu}}</ref> In these cases, the physical interpretation must be re-examined. As an example, the calculations of atomic structure in atomic physics or of molecular structure in quantum chemistry could not easily be repeated, if at all, using the "force-mediating particle" picture.{{factcitation needed|date=October 2014}}

<!-- Text below hidden for the time being (vs. being deleted) because it seems valuable, but needs rewriting in an encyclopedic form. Admonishment to look critically and avoid fallacy is unwikipedic. The CERN experiments are cited, but then criticized in a way appearing to be original research. Please reinstate with improvements. -->

<!-- Additionally, one should look critically{{fact|date=October 2014}} at the recent CERN experiments{{fact|date=October 2014}} in which evidence is shown supporting the physical reality of the Higgs boson, which is a force-mediating particle. One should be careful not to make the logical error known as [[Reification (fallacy)|reification]], which confuses concept and reality. -->

Line 21:

In both cases, the bodies appear to act on each other over a distance. The concept of [[Field (physics)|field]] was invented to mediate the interaction among bodies thus eliminating the need for [[Action at a distance (physics)|action at a distance]]. The gravitational force is mediated by the [[gravitational field]] and the Coulomb force is mediated by the [[electromagnetic field]].

=== Gravitational force ===

The [[Newton's law of universal gravitation|gravitational force]] on a mass <math> m </math> exerted by another mass <math> M </math> is

<math display="block">\mathbf{F} = - G \frac{m M}{r^2} \, \hat\mathbf{r} = m \mathbf{g} \left ( \mathbf{r} \right ),</math>

where {{math|''G''}} is the [[gravitationalNewtonian constant of gravitation]], {{mvar|r}} is the distance between the masses, and <math> \hat\mathbf{r} </math> is the [[unit vector]] from mass <math> M </math> to mass <math> m </math>.

The force can also be written

Line 33:

where <math>\rho_m</math> is the [[density|mass density]] at each point in space.

=== Coulomb force ===

The electrostatic [[Coulomb force]] on a charge <math> q </math> exerted by a charge <math> Q </math> is ([[SI units]])

Line 45:

<math>\rho_q</math> being the [[density|charge density]] at each point in space.

== Virtual-particle exchange ==

In perturbation theory, forces are generated by the exchange of [[virtual particle]]s. The mechanics of virtual-particle exchange is best described with the [[path integral formulation]] of quantum mechanics. There are insights that can be obtained, however, without going into the machinery of path integrals, such as why classical gravitational and electrostatic forces fall off as the inverse square of the distance between bodies.

=== Path-integral formulation of virtual-particle exchange ===

A virtual particle is created by a disturbance to the [[vacuum state]], and the virtual particle is destroyed when it is absorbed back into the vacuum state by another disturbance. The disturbances are imagined to be due to bodies that interact with the virtual particle’s field.

====The probabilityProbability amplitude ====

Using [[natural units]], <math> \hbar = c = 1 </math>, the probability amplitude for the creation, propagation, and destruction of a virtual particle is given, in the [[path integral formulation]] by

<math display="block"> Z \equiv

Line 84:

<math display="block">\hat O D\left ( x - y \right ) = \delta^4 \left ( x - y \right ).</math>

==== Energy of interaction ====

We assume that there are two point disturbances representing two bodies and that the disturbances are motionless and constant in time. The disturbances can be written

<math display="block"> J(x) = \left( J_1 +J_2,0,0,0 \right)</math>

<math display="block"> \begin{align}
J_1 &= a_1 \delta^3\left ( \vecmathbf x - \vecmathbf x_1 \right )</math> \\

<math display="block"> J_2 &= a_2 \delta^3\left ( \vecmathbf x - \vecmathbf x_2 \right )</math>

\end{align}</math>

where the delta functions are in space, the disturbances are located at <math> \vecmathbf x_1 </math> and <math> \vecmathbf x_2 </math>, and the coefficients <math> a_1 </math> and <math> a_2 </math> are the strengths of the disturbances.

If we neglect self-interactions of the disturbances then W becomes

Line 97 ⟶ 99:

which can be written

<math display="block"> W\left ( J \right ) =

- T a_1 a_2\int \frac{d^3k}{(2 \pi )^3} \; \; D\left ( k \right )\mid_{k_0=0} \; \exp\left ( i \vecmathbf k \cdot \left ( \vecmathbf x_1 - \vecmathbf x_2 \right ) \right ).

</math>

Line 104 ⟶ 106:

Finally, the change in energy due to the static disturbances of the vacuum is

<math display="block"> E = - \frac{W}{T} = a_1 a_2\int \frac{d^3k}{(2 \pi )^3} \; \; D\left ( k \right )\mid_{k_0=0} \; \exp\left ( i \vecmathbf k \cdot \left ( \vecmathbf x_1 - \vecmathbf x_2 \right ) \right ).</math>

If this quantity is negative, the force is attractive. If it is positive, the force is repulsive.

Examples of static, motionless, interacting currents are the [[Static forces and virtual-particle exchange#The Yukawa potential: The force between two nucleons in an atomic nucleus|Yukawa Potentialpotential]], the [[Static forces and virtual-particle exchange#The Coulomb potential in a vacuum|The Coulomb potential in a vacuum]], and the [[Static forces and virtual-particle exchange#Coulomb potential in a simple plasma or electron gas|Coulomb potential in a simple plasma or electron gas]].

The expression for the interaction energy can be generalized to the situation in which the point particles are moving, but the motion is slow compared with the speed of light. Examples are [[Staticthe forcesDarwin andinteraction virtual-particle exchange[[#Darwin interaction in a vacuum|Darwin interaction in a vacuum]] and [[Static forces and virtual-particle exchange#Darwin interaction in a plasma|Darwin interaction in a plasma]].

Finally, the expression for the interaction energy can be generalized to situations in which the disturbances are not point particles, but are possibly line charges, tubes of charges, or current vortices. Examples areinclude: [[Static forces and virtual-particle exchange#Two line charges embedded in a plasma or electron gas|Twotwo line charges embedded in a plasma or electron gas]], [[Static forces and virtual-particle exchange#Coulomb potential between two current loops embedded in a magnetic field|Coulomb potential between two current loops embedded in a magnetic field]], and the [[Static forces and virtual-particle exchange#Magnetic interaction between current loops in a simple plasma or electron gas|Magneticmagnetic interaction between current loops in a simple plasma or electron gas]]. As seen from the Coulomb interaction between tubes of charge example, shown below, these more complicated geometries can lead to such exotic phenomena as [[Fractional quantum Hall effect|fractional quantum numbers]].

== Selected examples ==

===The Yukawa potential: Thethe force between two nucleons in an atomic nucleus ===

Consider the [[Spin (physics)|spin]]-0 Lagrangian density<ref name="Zee"/>{{rp|pp=21–29}}

Line 128 ⟶ 130:

If we add a disturbance the probability amplitude becomes

<math display="block"> Z =

\int D\varphi \; \exp \left \{ i \int d^4x4\mathbf{x}\; \left [ \frac{1}{2} \left ( \left ( \partial \varphi \right )^2 - m^2\varphi^2 \right ) + J\varphi \right ] \right \}.</math>

If we integrate by parts and neglect boundary terms at infinity the probability amplitude becomes

Line 138 ⟶ 140:

From this it can be seen that

<math display="block">D\left ( k \right )\mid_{k_0=0} \; = \; -\frac{1}{\vec k^2 + m^2}.</math>

The energy due to the static disturbances becomes (see {{slink|Common integrals in quantum field theory#Yukawa Potential: The Coulomb potential with mass}})

<math display="block">E =-\frac{a_1 a_2}{4 \pi r} \exp \left ( -m r \right )</math>

with

<math display="block">r^2 = \left (\vecmathbf x_1 - \vecmathbf x_2 \right )^2</math>

which is attractive and has a range of <math display="block">\frac{1}{m}.</math>

[[Hideki Yukawa|Yukawa]] proposed that this field describes the force between two [[nucleon]]s in an atomic nucleus. It allowed him to predict both the range and the mass of the particle, now known as the [[pion]], associated with this field.

=== Electrostatics ===

====The Coulomb potential in a vacuum ====

Consider the [[Spin (physics)|spin]]-1 [[Proca action|Proca Lagrangian]] with a disturbance<ref name="Zee"/>{{rp|pp=30–31}}

Line 165 ⟶ 167:

If we follow the same procedure as we did with the Yukawa potential we find that

<math display="block">\begin{align}

& -\frac{1}{4} \int d^4x F_{\mu \nu}F^{\mu \nu}

&= -\frac{1}{4}\int d^4x \left( \partial_{\mu} A_{\nu} - \partial_{\nu} A_{\mu} \right)\left( \partial^{\mu} A^{\nu} - \partial^{\nu} A^{\mu} \right) \\

&= {} & \frac{1}{2}\int d^4x \; A_{\nu} \left( \partial^{2} A^{\nu} - \partial^{\nu} \partial_{\mu} A^{\mu} \right) \\

&= \frac{1}{2}\int d^4x \; A^{\mu} \left( \eta_{\mu \nu} \partial^{2} \right) A^{\nu},

\end{align}</math>

which implies

Line 176 ⟶ 178:

This yields

<math display="block">D\left( k \right)\mid_{k_0=0}\; = \; \frac{1}{\vecmathbf k^2 + m^2}</math>

for the [[timelike]] propagator and

<math display="block">E = + \frac{a_1 a_2}{4 \pi r} \exp \left( -m r \right)</math>

Line 186 ⟶ 188:

Therefore the energy reduces to the potential energy for the Coulomb force and the coefficients <math>a_1 </math> and <math>a_2 </math> are proportional to the electric charge. Unlike the Yukawa case, like bodies, in this electrostatic case, repel each other.

==== Coulomb potential in a simple plasma or electron gas ====

===== Plasma waves =====

The [[dispersion relation]] for [[plasma wave]]s is<ref name="Chen">{{cite book | first = Francis F. | last = Chen | title=Introduction to Plasma Physics| publisher= Plenum Press| year=1974 | isbn=0-306-30755-3}}</ref>{{rp|pp=75–82}}

<math display="block">\omega^2 = \omega_p^2 + \gamma\left( \omega \right) \frac{T_eT_\text{e}}{m} \vecmathbf k^2.</math>

where <math>\omega </math> is the angular frequency of the wave,

<math display="block">\omega_p^2 = \frac{4\pi n e^2}{m}</math>

is the [[plasma frequency]], <math>e </math> is the magnitude of the [[electron charge]], <math>m </math> is the [[electron mass]], <math>T_eT_\text{e} </math> is the electron [[temperature]] (the [[Boltzmann's constant]] equal to one), and <math>\gamma\left( \omega \right) </math> is a factor that varies with frequency from one to three. At high frequencies, on the order of the plasma frequency, the compression of the electron fluid is an [[adiabatic process]] and <math>\gamma\left( \omega \right) </math> is equal to three. At low frequencies, the compression is an [[isothermal process]] and <math>\gamma\left( \omega \right) </math> is equal to one. [[Retarded potential|Retardation]] effects have been neglected in obtaining the plasma-wave dispersion relation.

For low frequencies, the dispersion relation becomes

<math display="block"> \vecmathbf k^2 + \vecmathbf k_Dk_\text{D}^2 = 0</math>

where

<math display="block"> k_Dk_\text{D}^2= \frac{4\pi n e^2}{T_e}</math>

is the Debye number, which is the inverse of the [[Debye length]]. This suggests that the propagator is

<math display="block">D\left ( k \right )\mid_{k_0=0} \; = \; \frac{1}{\vec k^2 + k_Dk_\text{D}^2}.</math>

In fact, if the retardation effects are not neglected, then the dispersion relation is

<math display="block"> -k_0^2 +\vec k^2 + k_Dk_\text{D}^2 -\frac{m}{T_eT_\text{e}} k_0^2 = 0,</math>

which does indeed yield the guessed propagator. This propagator is the same as the massive Coulomb propagator with the mass equal to the inverse Debye length. The interaction energy is therefore

<math display="block">E = \frac{a_1 a_2}{4 \pi r} \exp \left ( -k_Dk_\text{D} r \right ).</math>

The Coulomb potential is screened on length scales of a Debye length.

===== Plasmons =====

In a quantum [[Free electron model|electron gas]], plasma waves are known as [[plasmon]]s. Debye screening is replaced with [[Thomas–Fermi screening]] to yield<ref>{{cite book | author=C. Kittel | title=[[Introduction to Solid State Physics]]|edition=Fifth | publisher= John Wiley and Sons| year=1976 | isbn=0-471-49024-5}} pp. 296-299.</ref>

<math display="block">E = \frac{a_1 a_2}{4 \pi r} \exp \left ( -k_sk_\text{s} r \right )</math>

where the inverse of the Thomas–Fermi screening length is

<math display="block"> k_sk_\text{s}^2 = \frac{6\pi n e^2}{\varepsilon_Fvarepsilon_\text{F}}</math>

and <math>\varepsilon_Fvarepsilon_\text{F}</math> is the [[Fermi energy]] <math display="inline">\varepsilon_Fvarepsilon_\text{F} = \frac{\hbar^2}{2m} \left( {3 \pi^2 n} \right)^{2/3} .</math>

This expression can be derived from the [[chemical potential]] for an electron gas and from [[Poisson's equation]]. The chemical potential for an electron gas near equilibrium is constant and given by

<math display="block"> \mu = -e\varphi + \varepsilon_Fvarepsilon_\text{F}</math>

where <math>\varphi</math> is the [[electric potential]]. Linearizing the Fermi energy to first order in the density fluctuation and combining with Poisson's equation yields the screening length. The force carrier is the quantum version of the [[plasma wave]].

===== Two line charges embedded in a plasma or electron gas =====

We consider a line of charge with axis in the ''z'' direction embedded in an electron gas

<math display="block"> J_1\left( x\right) = \frac{a_1}{L_B} \frac{1}{2 \pi r} \delta^2\left( r \right)</math>

where <math>r</math> is the distance in the ''xy''-plane from the line of charge, <math>L_B</math> is the width of the material in the z direction. The superscript 2 indicates that the [[Dirac delta function]] is in two dimensions. The propagator is

<math display="block">D\left ( k \right )\mid_{k_0=0}\; = \; \frac{1}{\vecmathbf k^2 + k_{Ds}^2}</math>

where <math>k_{Ds} </math> is either the inverse [[Debye–Hückel equation|Debye–Hückel screening length]] or the inverse [[Thomas–Fermi screening]] length.

Line 238 ⟶ 240:

For <math> k_{Ds} r_{12} \ll 1</math>, we have

<math display="block">K_0 \left( k_{Ds} r_{12} \right) \rightarrowto -\ln \left(\frac{k_{Ds} r_{12}}{2}\right) + 0.5772.</math>

==== Coulomb potential between two current loops embedded in a magnetic field ====

===== Interaction energy for vortices =====

We consider a charge density in tube with axis along a magnetic field embedded in an electron gas

Line 262 ⟶ 264:

\int_0^{2 \pi} \frac{d\varphi}{2 \pi} \exp\left( i p \cos(\varphi) \right) = \mathcal J_0 ( p ) . </math>

===== Electric field due to a density perturbation =====

The [[chemical potential]] near equilibrium, is given by

Line 269 ⟶ 271:

The density fluctuation is then

<math display="block"> \delta n = \frac{e \varphi}{\hbar \omega_c A_MA_\text{M} L_B}</math>

where <math> A_MA_\text{M} </math> is the area of the material in the plane perpendicular to the magnetic field.

[[Poisson's equation]] yields

<math display="block">\left( k^2 + k_B^2 \right) \varphi = 0</math>

where

<math display="block"> k_B^2 = \frac{4 \pi e^2}{\hbar \omega_c A_MA_\text{M} L_B}.</math>

The propagator is then

Line 291 ⟶ 293:

In analogy with [[plasmons]], the [[force carrier]] is the quantum version of the [[upper hybrid oscillation]] which is a longitudinal [[plasma wave]] that propagates perpendicular to the magnetic field.

===== Currents with angular momentum =====

====== Delta function currents ======

[[Image:100927c Angular momentum 11.jpg|thumb|250px|right|Figure 1. Interaction energy vs. ''r'' for angular momentum states of value one. The curves are identical to these for any values of <math>l\ell = l\ell'</math>. Lengths are in units are in <math>r_lr_\ell</math>, and the energy is in units of <math display="inline"> \frac{e^2}{L_B}</math>. Here <math>r = r_{12}</math>. Note that there are local minima for large values of <math> k_{B}</math>.]]

[[Image:100927 Angular momentum 15.jpg|thumb|250px|right|Figure 2. Interaction energy vs. r for angular momentum states of value one and five.]]

[[Image:101005 energy by theta.jpg|thumb|250px|right|Figure 3. Interaction energy vs. r for various values of theta. The lowest energy is for <math display="inline">\theta = \frac{\pi}{4}</math> or <math> \frac{l\ell}{l\ell'} = 1 </math>. The highest energy plotted is for <math display="inline">\theta = 0.90\frac{\pi}{4}</math>. Lengths are in units of <math>r_{l\ell l\ell'}</math>.]]

[[Image:101011 energy picture.jpg|thumb|250px|right|Figure 4. Ground state energies for even and odd values of angular momenta. Energy is plotted on the vertical axis and r is plotted on the horizontal. When the total angular momentum is even, the energy minimum occurs when <math> l\ell = l\ell' </math> or <math display="inline"> \frac{l\ell}{l\ell^*} = \frac{1}{2} </math>. When the total angular momentum is odd, there are no integer values of angular momenta that will lie in the energy minimum. Therefore, there are two states that lie on either side of the minimum. Because <math> l\ell \ne l\ell' </math>, the total energy is higher than the case when <math> l\ell = l\ell' </math> for a given value of <math> l\ell^* </math>.]]

Unlike classical currents, quantum current loops can have various values of the [[Larmor radius]] for a given energy.<ref name="Ezewa">{{cite book | first = Zyun F. | last = Ezewa | title=Quantum Hall Effects: Field Theoretical Approach And Related Topics | edition = Second | publisher= World Scientific| year=2008 | isbn=978-981-270-032-2}}</ref>{{rp|pp=187–190}} [[Landau level]]s, the energy states of a charged particle in the presence of a magnetic field, are multiply [[Degenerate energy level|degenerate]]. The current loops correspond to [[angular momentum]] states of the charged particle that may have the same energy. Specifically, the charge density is peaked around radii of

<math display="block">r_{l\ell} = \sqrt{l\ell}\;r_B\; \; \; l\ell=0,1,2, \ldots</math>

where <math>l\ell</math> is the angular momentum [[quantum number]]. When <math> l\ell = 1</math> we recover the classical situation in which the electron orbits the magnetic field at the [[Larmor radius]]. If currents of two angular momentum <math> l\ell > 0 </math> and <math>l\ell' \ge l\ell </math> interact, and we assume the charge densities are delta functions at radius <math>r_{l\ell}</math>, then the interaction energy is

<math display="block"> E =

\left( \frac{2 e^2}{L_B}\right) \int_0^{\infty} \frac{k\;dk \;}{k^2 + k_B^2 r_{l\ell}^2}

\;\mathcal J_0 \left ( k \right) \;\mathcal J_0 \left ( \sqrt{\frac{l\ell'}{l\ell}} \;k \right) \;\mathcal J_0 \left ( k \frac{r_{12}}{r_{l\ell}} \right).</math>

The interaction energy for <math> l\ell = l\ell'</math> is given in Figure 1 for various values of <math>k_B r_{l}\ell</math>. The energy for two different values is given in Figure 2.

====== Quasiparticles ======

For large values of angular momentum, the energy can have local minima at distances other than zero and infinity. It can be numerically verified that the minima occur at

<math display="block">r_{12} = r_{l\ell l\ell'} = \sqrt{l\ell + l\ell'} \; r_B.</math>

This suggests that the pair of particles that are bound and separated by a distance <math>r_{l\ell l\ell'} </math> act as a single [[quasiparticle]] with angular momentum <math> l\ell + l\ell'</math>.

If we scale the lengths as <math> r_{l\ell l\ell'} </math>, then the interaction energy becomes

<math display="block"> E = \frac{2 e^2}{L_B} \int_0^{\infty} \frac{k\,dk}{k^2 + k_B^2 r_{l\ell l\ell'}^2}

\;\mathcal J_0 \left ( \cos \theta \, k \right) \;\mathcal J_0 ( \sin \theta \,k ) \;\mathcal J_0{\left( k \frac{r_{12}}{r_{l\ell l\ell'}} \right)}</math>

where

<math display="block">\tan \theta = \sqrt{\frac{l\ell}{l\ell'}}.</math>

The value of the <math> r_{12} </math> at which the energy is minimum, <math>r_{12} = r_{l\ell l\ell'} </math>, is independent of the ratio <math display="inline"> \tan \theta = \sqrt{{l\ell}/{l\ell'}}</math>. However the value of the energy at the minimum depends on the ratio. The lowest energy minimum occurs when

<math display="block"> \frac{l\ell}{l\ell'} = 1.</math>

When the ratio differs from 1, then the energy minimum is higher (Figure 3). Therefore, for even values of total momentum, the lowest energy occurs when (Figure 4)

<math display="block"> l\ell = l\ell' = 1</math>

or

<math display="block"> \frac{l\ell}{l\ell^*} = \frac{1}{2} </math>

where the total angular momentum is written as

<math display="block"> l\ell^* = l\ell + l\ell'. </math>

When the total angular momentum is odd, the minima cannot occur for <math> l\ell = l\ell' . </math> The lowest energy states for odd total angular momentum occur when

<math display="block"> \frac{l\ell}{l\ell^*} = \; \frac{l\ell^*\pm 1}{2l2\ell^*}</math>

or

<math display="block">\frac{l\ell}{l\ell^*} = \frac{1}{3}, \frac{2}{5}, \frac{3}{7}, \text{etc.,} </math>

and

<math display="block">\frac{l\ell}{l\ell^*} = \frac{2}{3}, \frac{3}{5}, \frac{4}{7}, \text{etc.,} </math>

which also appear as series for the filling factor in the [[fractional quantum Hall effect]].

====== Charge density spread over a wave function ======

The charge density is not actually concentrated in a delta function. The charge is spread over a wave function. In that case the electron density is<ref name="Ezewa"/>{{rp|189}}

Line 351 ⟶ 353:

<math display="block"> E =

\left( \frac{2 e^2}{L_B}\right) \int_0^{\infty} \frac{k\;dk \;}{k^2 + k_B^2 r_{B}^2}

\; M {\left ( l\ell + 1, 1, -\frac{k^2}{4} \right)} \;M {\left ( l\ell' + 1, 1, -\frac{k^2}{4} \right)} \;\mathcal J_0 {\left ( k \frac{r_{12}}{r_{B}} \right)}

</math>

where <math>M</math> is a [[confluent hypergeometric function]] or [[Kummer function]]. In obtaining the interaction energy we have used the integral (see {{slink|Common integrals in quantum field theory#Integration over a magnetic wave function}})

<math display="block">

\frac{2}{n!} \int_0^{\infty} dr \; r^{2n+1}\exp\left( e^{-r^2\right)} J_0(kr)

= M\left( n+1, 1, -\frac{k^2}{4}\right). </math>

As with delta function charges, the value of <math>r_{12}</math> in which the energy is a local minimum only depends on the total angular momentum, not on the angular momenta of the individual currents. Also, as with the delta function charges, the energy at the minimum increases as the ratio of angular momenta varies from one. Therefore, the series

<math display="block">\frac{l\ell}{l\ell^*} = \frac{1}{3}, \frac{2}{5}, \frac{3}{7}, \text{etc.,} </math>

and

<math display="block">\frac{l\ell}{l\ell^*} = \frac{2}{3}, \frac{3}{5}, \frac{4}{7}, \text{etc.,} </math>

appear as well in the case of charges spread by the wave function.

The [[Laughlin wavefunction]] is an [[ansatz]] for the quasiparticle wavefunction. If the expectation value of the interaction energy is taken over a [[Laughlin wavefunction]], these series are also preserved.

=== Magnetostatics ===

==== Darwin interaction in a vacuum ====

A charged moving particle can generate a magnetic field that affects the motion of another charged particle. The static version of this effect is called the [[Darwin Lagrangian|Darwin interaction]]. To calculate this, consider the electrical currents in space generated by a moving charge

<math display="block">\vecmathbf J_1{\left( \vecmathbf x \right)} = a_1 \vecmathbf v_1 \delta^3 {\left( \vecmathbf x - \vecmathbf x_1 \right)}</math>

with a comparable expression for <math> \vecmathbf J_2 </math>.

The Fourier transform of this current is

<math display="block">\vecmathbf J_1{\left( \vecmathbf k \right)} = a_1 \vecmathbf v_1 \exp\left( i \vecmathbf k \cdot \vecmathbf x_1 \right).</math>

The current can be decomposed into a transverse and a longitudinal part (see [[Helmholtz decomposition]]).

<math display="block">\vecmathbf J_1{\left( \vecmathbf k \right)} = a_1 \left[ 1 - \hat\mathbf k \hat\mathbf k \right ] \cdot \vecmathbf v_1 \exp\left( i \vecmathbf k \cdot \vecmathbf x_1 \right) + a_1 \left[ \hat\mathbf k \hat\mathbf k \right ] \cdot \vecmathbf v_1 \exp\left( i \vecmathbf k \cdot \vecmathbf x_1 \right).</math>

The hat indicates a [[unit vector]]. The last term disappears because

<math display="block">\vecmathbf k \cdot \vecmathbf J = -k_0 J^0 \rightarrowto 0,</math>

which results from charge conservation. Here <math>k_0 </math> vanishes because we are considering static forces.

With the current in this form the energy of interaction can be written

<math display="block"> E = a_1 a_2\int \frac{d^3\mathbf{k}}{(2 \pi )^3} \; \; D\left ( k \right )\mid_{k_0=0} \;

\vecmathbf v_1 \cdot \left[ 1 - \hat\mathbf k \hat\mathbf k \right ] \cdot \vecmathbf v_2 \; \exp\left ( i \vecmathbf k \cdot \left ( \mathbf x_1 - \mathbf x_2 \right ) \right ) .</math>

a_1 a_2\int \frac{d^3k}{(2 \pi )^3} \; \; D\left ( k \right )\mid_{k_0=0} \;

\vec v_1 \cdot \left[ 1 - \hat k \hat k \right ] \cdot \vec v_2 \; \exp\left ( i \vec k \cdot \left ( x_1 - x_2 \right ) \right ) .</math>

The propagator equation for the Proca Lagrangian is

Line 395:

The [[spacelike]] solution is

<math display="block">D\left ( k \right )\mid_{k_0=0}\; = \; -\frac{1}{\vec k^2 + m^2},</math>

which yields

<math display="block"> E =

- a_1 a_2 \int \frac{d^3k3\mathbf{k}}{(2 \pi )^3} \; \;

\frac{\vecmathbf v_1 \cdot \left[ 1 - \hat\mathbf k \hat\mathbf k \right ] \cdot \vecmathbf v_2}{\vec k^2 + m^2} \; \exp\left ( i \vecmathbf k \cdot \left (\mathbf x_1 - \mathbf x_2 \right ) \right ),</math>

whichwhere <math display="inline">k = |\mathbf k|</math>. The integral evaluates to (see {{slink|Common integrals in quantum field theory#Transverse potential with mass}})

<math display="block"> E =

- \frac{1}{2} \frac{a_1 a_2}{4 \pi r} e^{ - m r} \left\{

\frac{2}{\left( mr \right)^2} \left( e^{mr} -1 \right) - \frac{2}{mr} \right \}

\vecmathbf v_1 \cdot \left[ 1 + {\hat\mathbf r} {\hat\mathbf r}\right]\cdot \vecmathbf v_2

</math>

which reduces to

<math display="block"> E = - \frac{1}{2} \frac{a_1 a_2}{4 \pi r} \vecmathbf v_1 \cdot \left[ 1 + {\hat\mathbf r} {\hat\mathbf r}\right] \cdot \vecmathbf v_2 </math>

in the limit of small {{mvar|m}}. The interaction energy is the negative of the interaction Lagrangian. For two like particles traveling in the same direction, the interaction is attractive, which is the opposite of the Coulomb interaction.

==== Darwin interaction in a plasma ====

In a plasma, the [[dispersion relation]] for an [[electromagnetic wave]] is<ref name="Chen"/>{{rp|pp=100–103}} (<math>c = 1</math>)

<math display="block">k_0^2 = \omega_p^2 +\vec k^2,</math>

which implies

<math display="block">D\left ( k \right )\mid_{k_0=0}\; = \; -\frac{1}{\vec k^2 + \omega_p^2}.</math>

Here <math>\omega_p</math> is the [[plasma frequency]]. The interaction energy is therefore

<math display="block"> E =

- \frac{1}{2} \frac{a_1 a_2}{4 \pi r}

\vecmathbf v_1 \cdot \left[ 1 + {\hat\mathbf r} {\hat\mathbf r}\right]\cdot \vecmathbf v_2

\; e^{ - \omega_p r } \left\{

\frac{2}{\left( \omega_p r \right)^2} \left( e^{\omega_p r} -1 \right) - \frac{2}{\omega_p r} \right \}.</math>

==== Magnetic interaction between current loops in a simple plasma or electron gas ====

=====The interactionInteraction energy =====

Consider a tube of current rotating in a magnetic field embedded in a simple [[Plasma (physics)|plasma]] or electron gas. The current, which lies in the plane perpendicular to the magnetic field, is defined as

<math display="block">\vecmathbf J_1( \vecmathbf x) = a_1 v_1 \frac{1}{2 \pi r L_B} \; \delta^ 2 {\left( r - r_{B1} \right)}

\left( \hat\mathbf b \times \hat\mathbf r \right)</math>

where

<math display="block"> r_{B1} = \frac{\sqrt{4 \pi}m_1 v_1}{a_1 B}</math>

and <math>\hat\mathbf b</math> is the unit vector in the direction of the magnetic field. Here <math>L_B</math> indicates the dimension of the material in the direction of the magnetic field. The transverse current, perpendicular to the [[wave vector]], drives the [[transverse wave]].

The energy of interaction is

Line 446 ⟶ 445:

= i\mathcal J_1 \left( p \right) . </math>

See ''{{slink|Common integrals in quantum field theory#Angular integration in cylindrical coordinates}}''.

A current in a plasma confined to the plane perpendicular to the magnetic field generates an [[Electromagnetic electron wave#X wave|extraordinary wave]].<ref name="Chen"/>{{rp|pp=110–112}} This wave generates [[Hall current]]s that interact and modify the electromagnetic field. The [[dispersion relation]] for extraordinary waves is<ref name="Chen"/>{{rp|112}}

<math display="block"> -k_0^2 +\vec k^2 + \omega_p^2 \frac{k_0^2 - \omega_p^2}{k_0^2- \omega_H^2} =0,</math>

which gives for the propagator

<math display="block"> D\left( k \right) \mid_{k_0=k_B=0}\;= \;-\left( \frac{1}{\vec k^2 + k_X^2}\right)</math>

where

<math display="block">k_X \equiv \frac{\omega_p^2}{\omega_H}</math>

Line 465 ⟶ 464:

The interaction energy becomes, for like currents,

<math display="block"> E =

- \left( \frac{a^2}{2 \pi L_B}\right) v^2\, \int_0^{\infty} \frac{k\;dk}{\vec k^2 + k_X^2}

\mathcal J_1^2 \left ( kr_{B} \right) \mathcal J_0 \left ( kr_{12} \right)</math>

===== Limit of small distance between current loops =====

In the limit that the distance between current loops is small,

<math display="block"> E = - E_0 \; I_1 {\left( \mu \right)} K_1 {\left( \mu \right)}</math>

where

<math display="block"> E_0 = \left( \frac{a^2}{2 \pi L_B}\right) v^2</math>

Line 484 ⟶ 483:

For small {{math|''mr''}} the integral becomes

<math display="block">

I_1 {\left( mr \right)} K_1 {\left( mr \right)}

\to

\rightarrow

\frac{1}{2}\left[ 1- \frac{1}{8}\left( mr \right)^2 \right] . </math>

Line 494 ⟶ 493:

\frac{1}{2}\;\left( \frac{1}{mr}\right) . </math>

===== Relation to the quantum Hall effect =====

The screening [[wavenumber]] can be written ([[Gaussian units]])

Line 512 ⟶ 511:

<math display="block">\frac{1}{2} m v^2 = \hbar \omega_c.</math>

=== Gravitation ===

A gravitational disturbance is generated by the [[stress–energy tensor]] <math> T^{\mu \nu} </math>; consequently, the Lagrangian for the gravitational field is [[Spin (physics)|spin]]-2. If the disturbances are at rest, then the only component of the stress–energy tensor that persists is the <math> 00 </math> component. If we use the same trick of giving the [[graviton]] some mass and then taking the mass to zero at the end of the calculation the propagator becomes

<math display="block">D\left ( k \right )\mid_{k_0=0}\; = \; - \frac{4}{3} \frac{1}{\vec k^2 + m^2}</math>

and

<math display="block">E = -\frac{4}{3}\frac{a_1 a_2}{4 \pi r} \exp \left ( -m r \right ),</math>

Line 521 ⟶ 520:

Unlike the electrostatic case, however, taking the small-mass limit of the boson does not yield the correct result. A more rigorous treatment yields a factor of one in the energy rather than 4/3.<ref name="Zee"/>{{rp|35}}

== References ==

{{reflist}}

{{Reflist}}<!--added under references heading by script-assisted edit-->

[[Category:Quantum field theory]]