Talk:Android software development: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 11:58, 15 April 2022

Latest revision as of 11:42, 10 July 2024

(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)

Line 10:

{{skip to talk}}

{{split article|to=Android software development|from=Android (operating system)|diff=http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Android_%28operating_system%29&diff=428851328&oldid=428848935|date=13 May 2011}}

{{Talk header|search=yes|archive_age=90|archive_bot=lowercase sigmabot III}}

{{WikiProjectBannerShellWikiProject banner shell|collapsed=yes|blp=no|class=B|

{{WikiProject SoftwareAndroid |class=B|importance=mid|computing-importance=midHigh}}

{{WikiProject Software|importance=mid|computing-importance=mid}}

}}<br />

__TOC__

Line 21 ⟶ 22:

I am a little bit puzzled: In Sec. 1.1 someone says: "The officially supported integrated development environment (IDE) is Eclipse using the Android Development Tools (ADT) Plugin, though IntelliJ IDEA IDE (all editions) fully supports Android development out of the box" but when I visit the "Building Your First App" intro on [https://developer.android.com/training/basics/firstapp/index.html https://developer.android.com/] it refers me to the community edition [[Android Studio]]. I am a newbie in Android development, so I would appreciate any clarification. Additionally [[Android Studio]] is labeled on its [https://developer.android.com/sdk/index.html download page] as "The official Android IDE" on 14. Jan. 2015. <small>[[User:Treutwein|Treutwein]] ([[User talk:Treutwein|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Treutwein|contribs]])</small>

== Proposed merge of [[Android NDK]] into [[Android software development]] ==

{{Discussion top|result=To '''not''' merge, given consensus that [[Android NDK]] has sufficient distinct reliable sources to warrant separate coverage. [[User:Klbrain|Klbrain]] ([[User talk:Klbrain|talk]]) 11:58, 15 April 2022 (UTC)}}

Don't need a separate article for the NDK [[User:Joseph2302|<b style="color:#0033ab">Joseph</b>]][[User talk:Joseph2302|<b style="color:#000000">2302</b>]] ([[User talk:Joseph2302|talk]]) 21:51, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

:@[[User:Joseph2302|Joseph2302]] However, it would feel more encyclopedic if it did. The article itself needs some improvement in the fact that it is missing a lot of sections, images but you didn't link to which policy or guideline it broke so I do '''Not Support'''. [[User:SoyokoAnis|<span style="color: blue">SoyokoAnis</span>]] - [[User talk:SoyokoAnis|<span style="color: blue">talk</span>]] 13:24, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

::[[WP:REDUNDANTFORK]], no need for a separate article. [[User:Joseph2302|<b style="color:#0033ab">Joseph</b>]][[User talk:Joseph2302|<b style="color:#000000">2302</b>]] ([[User talk:Joseph2302|talk]]) 13:29, 6 January 2022 (UTC)

:::@[[User:Joseph2302|Joseph2302]] @[[User:SoyokoAnis|SoyokoAnis]] I don't see how [[WP:REDUNDANTFORK]] applies to this issue. The content about the NDK is not covered in the Android software development software. The NDK meets the [[WP:GNG]]. Personally, I don't think the Android software development article should exists. I think the separate tools should have their own article (such as the [[Android SDK]], [[fastboot]] and [[Android Debug Bridge]]) and that the remaining of the software development article should be merged into a development paragraph of the main Android article. [[User:PhotographyEdits|PhotographyEdits]] ([[User talk:PhotographyEdits|talk]]) 14:54, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

::::Is there a lot of coverage for it? If so, then it is okay to have a separate article. (Coverage means sources) [[User:SoyokoAnis|<span style="color: blue">SoyokoAnis</span>]] - [[User talk:SoyokoAnis|<span style="color: blue">talk</span>]] 14:58, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

:::::There are currently two entire dedicated books to the NDK used as a reference in this article. This is more than enough for meeting the [[WP:GNG]]. [[User:PhotographyEdits|PhotographyEdits]] ([[User talk:PhotographyEdits|talk]]) 10:16, 31 January 2022 (UTC)

{{Discussion bottom}}