Talk:Dynamic random-access memory: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Only a man: new section
Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit New topic
m Removed deprecated parameters in {{Talk header}} that are now handled automatically (Task 30)
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{Skip to talk}}
{{Talk header|archive_age=365|archive_bot=Lowercase Sigmabot III}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
| algo=old(365d)
Line 7:
| maxarchivesize=75K
| archiveheader={{Aan}}
| minthreadsleft=14
| minthreadstoarchive=1
}}
Line 36:
 
If anyone is interested in a copy of the article, I can scan the page from the magazine and publish it somewhere.
 
== Toshiba Invented the DRAM ==
 
No one is gonna put it on the article of course but that's what I see if the Farber and Schlig is in reality a static RAM as stated by Avivanov above, in fact it appears that it is if the article of [[Static random-access memory]] on this same website is anything to go by. Would be nice if someone that knew about the subject completed the history section a bit because there is always the posibility that the Toshiba calculator might not be the first to use such memory mechanism. I could search for patents but I'm not an expert.
[[User:Mirad1000|Mirad1000]] ([[User talk:Mirad1000|talk]]) 16:26, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
 
:Added what I'm sure is the Toshiba patent of the tech used in their calculators. There are earlier patents that describe similar capacitor memory though and the article probably should reflect that but I do not have the knowledge. This "DRAM" was probably used in some devices at the beginning of the end of 50s/ early 60s if we go by patents. [[User:Mirad1000|Mirad1000]] ([[User talk:Mirad1000|talk]]) 17:51, 18 June 2023 (UTC)
 
== Equivalent? ==
Line 54 ⟶ 47:
::::::That's perfect! Thank you so much. I'm surprised the MOS would recommend the former, but these things are beyond mere mortals such as myself. cheers. [[User:Anastrophe|anastrophe]], [[User talk:Anastrophe|an editor he is.]] 22:21, 13 January 2024 (UTC)
:::::::To be fair, the MOS doesn't recommend inline footnotes but it seems to allow [[MOS:HATNOTE|hatnotes]] for other purposes only. Sadly, it doesn't permit the use of more modern units such as Kibit and Mibit. --[[User:Zac67|Zac67]] ([[User talk:Zac67|talk]]) 07:20, 14 January 2024 (UTC)
 
== Only a man ==
 
Shut you would find [[Special:Contributions/159.196.132.28|159.196.132.28]] ([[User talk:159.196.132.28|talk]]) 07:11, 14 February 2024 (UTC)