Geolocation-based video game: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 15:04, 10 October 2022

Latest revision as of 15:09, 21 July 2024

(20 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown)

Line 1:

{{distinguish|#REDIRECT [[Location-based game]] {{R from merge}}

A '''geolocation-based video game''', (or '''___location-based video game''') is a type of video game where the [[gameplay]] evolves and progresses via a player's ___location in the world, often attained using [[GPS]]. Most ___location-based video games are [[mobile games]] that make use of the mobile phone's built in GPS capability. One of the most recognizable ___location-based mobile games is [[Pokémon Go]].

Location-based games often have real-world map integration.

Location-based (GPS) games are often conflated with [[augmented reality]] (AR) games. GPS and AR are two separate technologies which are sometimes both used in a game, like in [[Pokémon Go]] and [[Minecraft Earth]]. GPS and AR functionality largely do not depend on one another but are often used in concert. A video game may be an AR game, a ___location-based game, both, or neither.

==Legality==

The nature of ___location-based gaming may mean that certain real-world locations will be visited by higher-than-normal numbers of people who are playing the game, which generally has been received favorably by nearby attractions or local businesses. However, these games may generate activity at locations that are privately-owned or have access limits, or otherwise cause undesirable congestion.

''[[Pokémon Go]]'' notably has several publicized events of players being drawn to inappropriate locations for the game, requiring the developer to manually remove these areas from the game.<ref>{{cite web |last1 = Velloso |first1 = Eduardo |last2 = Carter |first2 = Marcus |title = Some places should be off limits for games such as Pokémon GO |url = https://theconversation.com/some-places-should-be-off-limits-for-games-such-as-pokemon-go-62341 |website = The Conversation |access-date = July 13, 2016 }}</ref><ref>{{cite news |title = Holocaust Museum, Auschwitz want Pokémon Go hunts out |url = https://www.usatoday.com/story/tech/news/2016/07/12/holocaust-museum-auschwitz-want-pokmon-go-hunts-stop-pokmon/86991810/ |access-date = July 13, 2016 |work = USA Today }}</ref><ref>{{cite web |url = http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/2016-07-12-holocaust-museum-pleads-stop-playing-pokemon-go-here |title = Holocaust museum pleads: stop playing Pokémon Go here |first = Tom |last = Phillips |work = [[Eurogamer]] |date = July 12, 2016 |access-date = July 13, 2016 }}</ref> In one of the first legal challenges for ___location-based gaming, a Federal District court ruled that a Wisconsin county ordinance to require game developers of such ___location-based games to get appropriate permits to allow locations in the county's public park systems was likely unconstitutional. While the county had felt there was no [[First Amendment]] rights involved due to how locations were generated in-game, the Federal judge disagreed.<ref>{{Cite web | url = https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2017/07/judge-blocks-law-regulating-where-augmented-reality-games-can-be-played/ | title = Augmented reality wins big in 1st Amendment legal flap | first = David | last= Kravets | date = July 20, 2017 | access-date = July 20, 2017 | work = [[Ars Technica]] }}</ref>

The interaction of ___location-bound augmented reality with [[property law]] is largely undefined.{{sfn|McClure|2017|p=364-366}}<ref>{{ cite web | url = https://slate.com/technology/2018/06/can-you-prevent-augmented-reality-ads-from-appearing-on-your-house.html | title = What Are Your Augmented Reality Property Rights? | first = Fiona J | last = McEvoy | publisher = [[Slate (magazine)|Slate]] | date = 4 June 2018 | accessdate = 31 May 2022 }}</ref> Several models have been analysed for how this interaction may be resolved in a [[common law]] context: an extension of [[real property]] rights to also cover augmentations on or near the property with a strong notion of [[trespassing]], forbidding augmentations unless allowed by the owner; an '[[open range]]' system, where augmentations are allowed unless forbidden by the owner; and a '[[freedom to roam]]' system, where real property owners have no control over non-disruptive augmentations.{{sfn|Mallick|2020|p=1068-1072}}

One issue experienced during the [[Pokémon Go]] craze was the game's players disturbing owners of private property while visiting nearby ___location-bound augmentations, which may have been on the properties or the properties may have been ''en route''. The terms of service of Pokémon Go explicitly disclaim responsibility for players' actions, which may limit (but may not totally extinguish) the liability of its producer, [[Niantic (company)|Niantic]], in the event of a player [[trespassing]] while playing the game: by Niantic's argument, the player is the one committing the trespass, while Niantic has merely engaged in permissible [[free speech]]. A theory advanced in lawsuits brought against Niantic is that their placement of game elements in places that will lead to trespass or an exceptionally large flux of visitors can constitute [[nuisance]], despite each individual trespass or visit only being tenuously caused by Niantic.{{sfn|McClure|2017|p=341-343}}{{sfn|McClure|2017|p=347-351}}{{sfn|Conroy|2017|p=20}}

Another claim raised against Niantic is that the placement of profitable game elements on land without permission of the land's owners is [[unjust enrichment]].{{sfn|McClure|2017|p=351-353}} More hypothetically, a property may be augmented with [[advertising]] or disagreeable content against its owner's wishes.{{sfn|Conroy|2017|p=21-22}} Under American law, these situations are unlikely to be seen as a violation of [[real property]] rights by courts without an expansion of those rights to include augmented reality (similarly to how [[English common law]] came to recognise [[air rights]]).{{sfn|McClure|2017|p=351-353}}

Some attempts at legislative regulation have been made in the [[United States]]. [[Milwaukee County, Wisconsin]] attempted to regulate augmented reality games played in its parks, requiring prior issuance of a permit,{{sfn|McClure|2017|p=354-355}} but this was criticised on [[free speech]] grounds by a federal judge;<ref>{{ cite news | url = https://apnews.com/article/58ca55eb0a00440d872444bde69b8092 | title = Judge halts Wisconsin county rule for apps like Pokemon Go | work = Associated Press | date = 21 July 2017 }}</ref> and [[Illinois]] considered mandating a [[notice and take down]] procedure for ___location-bound augmentations.{{sfn|McClure|2017|p=356-357}}

== Notable examples ==

{{For|list of geolocation-based video games|List of geolocation-based video games}}

* [[Pokémon Go]]

* [[Harry Potter: Wizards Unite]] (discontinued)

* [[Ingress (video game)|Ingress]]

* [[Geocaching]]

* [[BotFighters]]<ref name="spacetimeplay">{{Citation

| editor1-last= von Borries | editor1-first= Friedrich

| editor2-last= Walz | editor2-first= Steffen P.

| editor3-last= Böttger | editor3-first= Matthias

| title = Space Time Play

| place = Basel, Boston, Berlin

| publisher = Birkhäuser Verlag AG

| year = 2007

| chapter = BotFighters: A Game That Surrounds You

| pages = 226–227

| chapter-url = http://spacetimeplay.org

| isbn = 978-3-7643-8414-2}}</ref>

* [[Dragon Quest Walk]]

* [[Shadow Cities]] (discontinued)

* [[Maguss]] (discontinued)

* [[Minecraft Earth]] (discontinued)<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.minecraft.net/en-us/article/minecraft-earth-coming-end|title=Minecraft Earth coming to an end|date=5 January 2021}}</ref>

* [[Cluetivity]]

== See Also ==

* [[Transreality gaming]]

==References==

{{reflist}}

[[Category:Game terminology]]

[[Category:Pervasive games]]