Hierarchical decision process: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
GreenC bot (talk | contribs)
Rescued 1 archive link. Wayback Medic 2.5 per WP:URLREQ#ieee.org
 
(20 intermediate revisions by 18 users not shown)
Line 1:
<!-- {{more citations needed|date=March 2011}} -->
{{Multiple issues|orphan =February 2009|wikify =January 2009|context =October 2009}}
{{one source |date=April 2024}}
{{Use dmy dates|date=November 2022}}
For [[group decision-making]], the '''hierarchical decision process''' ('''HDP''') refines the classical AHP [[Analyticanalytic Hierarchyhierarchy Processprocess]] (AHP) a step further in eliciting and evaluating subjective judgements. These improvements, proposed initially by Dr. Jang Ra (a student of Dr. Saaty [[Thomas L. Saaty]] who developed and refined AHP) include the constant-sum measurement scale (1-991–99 scale) for comparing two elements, the logarithmic [[least squares method]] (LLSM) for computing normalized values, the sum of inverse column sums (SICS) for measuring the degree of (in)consistency, and sensitivity analysis of pairwise comparisons [[Matrix (mathematics)|matrices]]. These subtle modifications address issues concerning normal AHP consistency and applicability in the process of constructing hierarchies: generating criteria, classifying/selecting criteria, and screening/selecting decision alternatives. IEEE has a link to the five page pdf in<ref>''[https://web.archive.org/web/20080324181729/http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/RecentCon.jsp?punumber=586 Technology Management: the New International Language]'', 27-3127–31 Oct 1991, pp.&nbsp;595–599, {{ISBN |0-7803-0161-7 [http://ieeexplore}}.ieee.org</xpl/RecentCon.jsp?punumber=586], although it costs about $29.95. New posts to this article will include excerpts and notes from the University of Alaska's Engineering Science / Project Management Risk Management course 624 in which Dr. Ra discussed the applicability of both AHP and DHP in context of actual case studies in both chain and pairwise comparison techniques linked into Decision Tree Analysis (bayesian networks).ref>
 
==References==
Hierarchical Decision Process
{{reflist}}
 
[[Category:Group decision-making]]
HDP refines the classical AHP [[Analytic Hierarchy Process]] a step further in eliciting and evaluating subjective judgements. These improvements, proposed initially by Dr. Jang Ra (a student of Dr. Saaty [[Thomas L. Saaty]] who developed and refined AHP) include the constant-sum measurement scale (1-99 scale) for comparing two elements, the logarithmic least squares method (LLSM) for computing normalized values, the sum of inverse column sums (SICS) for measuring the degree of (in)consistency, and sensitivity analysis of pairwise comparisons matrices. These subtle modifications address issues concerning normal AHP consistency and applicability in the process of constructing hierarchies: generating criteria, classifying/selecting criteria, and screening/selecting decision alternatives. IEEE has a link to the five page pdf in Technology Management: the New International Language, 27-31 Oct 1991, pp.&nbsp;595–599, ISBN 0-7803-0161-7 [http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/RecentCon.jsp?punumber=586], although it costs about $29.95. New posts to this article will include excerpts and notes from the University of Alaska's Engineering Science / Project Management Risk Management course 624 in which Dr. Ra discussed the applicability of both AHP and DHP in context of actual case studies in both chain and pairwise comparison techniques linked into Decision Tree Analysis (bayesian networks).
 
 
[[Category:Decision theory]]
{{Mathematics-stub}}