Content deleted Content added
→İdil: new section |
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 2 WikiProject templates. Create {{WPBS}}. Tag: |
||
| (23 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|
{{WikiProject Kurdistan}}
{{WikiProject Turkey}}
}}
== Map standards ==
Line 22 ⟶ 24:
:Here is the source itself [https://twitter.com/ziyapir/status/633691021302472704]. --[[User:Ahmetyal|Ahmetyal]] ([[User talk:Ahmetyal|talk]]) 17:40, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
::Thank you i adjusted it, please stick around and help us keep up this map. [[User:Spenk01|Spenk01]] ([[User talk:Spenk01|talk]]) 22:27, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
:::Here's an english article about the attack on Silvan/Farqîn [http://jinha.com.tr/en/ALL-NEWS/content/view/29065?page=1
== Adding cities ==
Line 129 ⟶ 131:
:Look up "Kurd" in any English dictionary and you will see the word describes an ethnic group, not a political faction. As for PKK, HPG etc., they are all affiliated organizations, just as the Turkish land forces, the Turkish special forces, the Turkish gendarmerie and the Turkish police are all organs of the Turkish state. --[[User:Mttll|Mttll]] ([[User talk:Mttll|talk]]) 11:23, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
{{Comment}} In this issue [[User:Mttll|Mttll]] is right. Labelling one side as "Kurds" and the other as "Government" aint fair or balanced. What would be logic is either called them "Kurds" & "Turks" or "Government" & "PKK/YPS, etc...".--[[User:HCPUNXKID|<
== City icons ==
Line 166 ⟶ 168:
::Turkish media. Can we trust? <span style="color:#00000BB;font:13px 'verdana';">'''[[User:Um_simples_Wikipedista|''A simple Wikipedian'']]''' <sup>([[User talk:Um simples Wikipedista|said]] and [[Special:Contributions/Um_simples_Wikipedista|did]])</sup></span> 05:14, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
Yes, you can trust. Tekin 12:58, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
: Well, Turkey doesn't have a free press, but most countries don't. It wouldn't lie about this sort of thing, since they could easily be proven wrong. It's reliable in this case. --[[User:Monochrome Monitor|<small style="font: 13px Courier New">Monochrome</small>]]<big>_</big>[[User talk:Monochrome Monitor|<small style="font: 13px Courier New">Monitor</small>]] 05:08, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Line 258 ⟶ 260:
:::::: I introduced your updates but I suspect that specific villages are involved rather than the administrative center of districts. If so, I'll add the villages I guess. --[[User:Monochrome Monitor|<small style="font: 13px Courier New">Monochrome</small>]]<big>_</big>[[User talk:Monochrome Monitor|<small style="font: 13px Courier New">Monitor</small>]] 16:15, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
::::::: {{ping|Monochrome Monitor}} Clashes are happening in couple of neighborhoods in those districts I mentioned, for example in Diyarbakir's Sur district the fighting is limited to an area that's only 150mx150m big (operations in Sur are expected end in a week), but I think instead of doing that just focusing on districts as a whole would be a lot easier. And you can see the latest developments here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PKK_rebellion_(2015%E2%80%93present)#2016_Timeline [[User:Patetez|Patetez]] ([[User talk:Patetez|talk]]) 16:58, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
:::::::: I think the name should stay, because there is more militias who opposes Turkey (but they are lower in significance), they are Maoists, DKHP/C and ISIL. (I had not added ther icons yet, however this will be more better if i added this because they are giving more information) --[[User:SMB99thx|SMB99thx]] [[User talk:SMB99thx|XD]] ([[Special:Contributions/SMB99thx|contribs]]) 09:15, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
*'''Comment''' - so we have the following opinions:
::PKK insurgency - Greyshark, Patetez
Line 283 ⟶ 286:
== İdil ==
100% Turkish victory!
http://www.kentgundemi.net/dunya/idil-deki-operasyonlar-tamamlandi-h51995.html
http://www.sondakika.com/haber/haber-idil-de-teror-operasyonlari-bitti-114-terorist-8238094/
http://odatv.com/o-ilcede-operasyonlar-bitti-0803161200.html
http://www.hurhaber.com/idil-de-operasyon-bitti-haberi-62002.html
== Sur, Diyarbakir ==
100% Turkish victory!<ref>http://www.haberturk.com/gundem/haber/1207300-diyarbakirin-sur-ilcesindeki-operasyonlar-sona-erdi</ref> [[User:Beshogur|Beshogur]] ([[User talk:Beshogur|talk]]) 15:54, 9 March 2016 (UTC)
== The map ==
Why do you keep changing it? The one by nordnordwest is accurate, the current one isn't. Can we get a consensus on this? I hate making the same points over and over again and not being listened to.... it's exhausting. --[[User:Monochrome Monitor|<small style="font: 13px Courier New">Monochrome</small>]]<big>_</big>[[User talk:Monochrome Monitor|<small style="font: 13px Courier New">Monitor</small>]] 03:53, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
: This is pissing me off. Please stop. I'm restoring the accurate map AGAIN.--[[User:Monochrome Monitor|<small style="font: 13px Courier New">Monochrome</small>]]<big>_</big>[[User talk:Monochrome Monitor|<small style="font: 13px Courier New">Monitor</small>]] 22:32, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
:: {{ping|Kordestan}} Holy shit! I didn't even know that map existed pretty cool. I wish it used the other map though. --[[User:Monochrome Monitor|<small style="font: 13px Courier New">Monochrome</small>]]<big>_</big>[[User talk:Monochrome Monitor|<small style="font: 13px Courier New">Monitor</small>]] 02:18, 13 March 2016 (UTC)
== Color ==
It might be better to make the govt red instead of green, to make it more distinguishable
:: I'm all for it. I definitely think the Kurds should be yellow though considering they are colored shades of yellow in other modules, also it fits with the sun in the alaya rengin. --[[User:Monochrome Monitor|<small style="font: 13px Courier New">Monochrome</small>]]<big>_</big>[[User talk:Monochrome Monitor|<small style="font: 13px Courier New">Monitor</small>]] 03:55, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
::It is against the original purpose of this map. See [[Module_talk:Turkish_Insurgency_Detailed_Map#Map_standards]]. The aim is to combine all maps into Middle East crisis map with Red for pro-Iranian axis, lime for Sunni Arab League forces, Yellow for Kurdish factions, Black for ISIS, Grey for al-Qaeda, Blue for non-involved.[[User:Greyshark09|'''''GreyShark''''']] ([[User talk:Greyshark09|''dibra'']]) 10:53, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
:::See [[:Template:Syrian, Iraqi, Lebanese and Turkish insurgencies detailed map]].[[User:Greyshark09|'''''GreyShark''''']] ([[User talk:Greyshark09|''dibra'']]) 11:29, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
:::: Agree about them being red. Yellow and green are close to eachother, also red de facto here means "government" --[[User:Monochrome Monitor|<small style="font: 13px Courier New">Monochrome</small>]]<big>_</big>[[User talk:Monochrome Monitor|<small style="font: 13px Courier New">Monitor</small>]] 14:12, 12 April 2016 (UTC)
::::: Oh, oops. I didn't know red was for the Iranian axis, I thought it was for the govt. Though I suppose the government of Syria and Iraq are both part of the Iranian axis.... anyway, I still think the color choice is not particularly color-blind friendly. --[[User:Monochrome Monitor|<small style="font: 13px Courier New">Monochrome</small>]]<big>_</big>[[User talk:Monochrome Monitor|<small style="font: 13px Courier New">Monitor</small>]] 22:40, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
== what??? ==
What is up with these colors? TWO greens for Turkey? Is there a reasoning or can I change it? --[[User:Monochrome Monitor|<small style="font: 13px Courier New">Monochrome</small>]]<big>_</big>[[User talk:Monochrome Monitor|<small style="font: 13px Courier New">Monitor</small>]] 16:19, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
: It seems like there isn't any pattern to which were made dark and the others light either... --[[User:Monochrome Monitor|<small style="font: 13px Courier New">Monochrome</small>]]<big>_</big>[[User talk:Monochrome Monitor|<small style="font: 13px Courier New">Monitor</small>]] 01:55, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
| |||