Revision as of 16:31, 5 August 2024 edit 91.150.21.54 (talk) →Native support under Windows: wtf ← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 16:37, 5 August 2024 edit undo 91.150.21.54 (talk) →Native support under Windows: actually, I'll just remove this because otherwise it'll hang on here for another decade; this misinformation has been here for eighteen years already
Line 58: == Native support under Windows == [[Windows 95]] and its successors [[Windows 98]] and [[Windows Me]] ~~can~~have ~~read~~no ~~and~~support ~~write~~for HPFS only when mapped via a network share; they cannot read it from a local disk.{{what\|reason=what is the point of this? It's like saying Win95 can read and write (any unsupported) file system through a network share -- of course it can. It has no knowledge of, nor is touching the underlying file system at all -- it only accesses it through the SMB/CIFS protocol after all. Utterly baffling sentence.}} {{citation needed span\|date=May 2023\|They listed the [[NTFS]] partitions of networked computers as "HPFS"}}, because NTFS and HPFS share the same [[Partition type\|filesystem identification number]] in the partition table. [[Windows NT 3.1]] and [[Windows NT 3.5\|3.5]] have native read/write support for local disks and can even be installed onto an HPFS partition.

High Performance File System: Difference between revisions