Content deleted Content added
Reverted 1 edit by Farhad.drakhsh (talk): That's off-topic for this page |
→Dead link: new section |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{WikiProject
{{WikiProject Telecommunications|importance=mid}}
}}
==Examples==
This article uses examples pertaining to GSM technology only. Yet, 3 of the MVNOs given in examples do not even use GSM. Boost uses iDen technology, amp'd and Virgin Mobile use CDMA2000. Can we correct this to add more neutral information? [[User:Spinfire|Spinfire]] 06:08, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
Line 58 ⟶ 59:
I've noticed, cricket and NOW Ryan Renolds new investment company mint mobile (actually uses t-mobile towers). So if the price is amazing, and service is reliable why do the big 3 do this? There undercutting themselves. Is this like a sabotage move where they offer these services to these companies but make them poor quality so customers don't continue using them and go back to the big 3? or is this the big 3 assuming that if they don't have smaller companies that offer their services then those people won't use cell service at all.
For the life of me, I have no idea why these companies do this? there much cheaper than their direct service. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/73.81.154.97|73.81.154.97]] ([[User talk:73.81.154.97#top|talk]]) 06:42, 12 March 2021 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
== Dead link ==
Hi, I noticed a dead link ("MVNO Classifications & Types". MVNO Dynamics. 4 May 2011. Retrieved 4 July 2017.[dead link]). I looked around for an alternative description. Personally I think this page would be a good reference: https://mvno-index.com/different-types-of-mvnos-mobile-brands/ this website looks to be a good content hub for MVNO. Maybe somebody can replace the dead link? [[Special:Contributions/46.21.164.93|46.21.164.93]] ([[User talk:46.21.164.93|talk]]) 13:56, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
| |||