Descriptive set theory: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Polish spaces: Added wl
Reverted 1 edit by Naklowpr (talk): Removed reflist
 
(22 intermediate revisions by 20 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{short description|Subfield of mathematical logic}}
In [[mathematical logic]], '''descriptive set theory''' ('''DST''') is the study of certain classes of "[[well-behaved]]" [[set (mathematics)|subset]]s of the [[real line]] and other [[Polish space]]s. As well as being one of the primary areas of research in [[set theory]], it has applications to other areas of mathematics such as [[functional analysis]], [[ergodic theory]], the study of [[operator algebras]] and [[Group action (mathematics)|group actions]], and [[mathematical logic]].
 
== Polish spaces ==
Line 5 ⟶ 6:
Descriptive set theory begins with the study of Polish spaces and their [[Borel set]]s.
 
A '''[[Polish space]]''' is a [[second -countable]] [[topological space]] that is [[metrizable]] with a [[complete metric]]. EquivalentlyHeuristically, it is a complete [[separable metric space]] whose metric has been "forgotten". Examples include the [[real line]] <math>\mathbb{R}</math>, the [[Baire space (set theory)|Baire space]] <math>\mathcal{N}</math>, the [[Cantor space]] <math>\mathcal{C}</math>, and the [[Hilbert cube]] <math>I^{\mathbb{N}}</math>.
 
=== Universality properties ===
Line 11 ⟶ 12:
The class of Polish spaces has several universality properties, which show that there is no loss of generality in considering Polish spaces of certain restricted forms.
 
* Every Polish space is [[homeomorphic]] to a [[Gδ space|''G''<sub>&delta;</sub> [[subspace topology|subspace]] of the [[Hilbert cube]], and every ''G''<sub>&delta;</sub> subspace of the Hilbert cube is Polish.
* Every Polish space is obtained as a continuous image of Baire space; in fact every Polish space is the image of a continuous bijection defined on a closed subset of Baire space. Similarly, every compact Polish space is a continuous image of Cantor space.
 
Line 27 ⟶ 28:
=== Borel hierarchy ===
 
Each Borel set of a Polish space is classified in the '''[[Borel hierarchy]]''' based on how many times the operations of countable union and complementation must be used to obtain the set, beginning from open sets. The classification is in terms of [[countable set|countable]] [[ordinal number]]s. For each nonzero countable ordinal ''&alpha;'' there are classes <math>\mathbf{\Sigma}^0_\alpha</math>, <math>\mathbf{\Pi}^0_\alpha</math>, and <math>\mathbf{\Delta}^0_\alpha</math>.
* Every open set is declared to be <math>\mathbf{\Sigma}^0_1</math>.
* A set is declared to be <math>\mathbf{\Pi}^0_\alpha</math> if and only if its complement is <math>\mathbf{\Sigma}^0_\alpha</math>.
* A set ''A'' is declared to be <math>\mathbf{\Sigma}^0_\delta</math>, ''&delta;'' > 1, if there is a sequence &lang; ''A''<sub>''i''</sub> &rang; of sets, each of which is <math>\mathbf{\Pi}^0_{\lambda(i)}</math> for some ''&lambda;''(''i'') < ''&delta;'', such that <math>A = \bigcup A_i</math>.
* A set is <math>\mathbf{\Delta}^0_\alpha</math> if and only if it is both <math>\mathbf{\Sigma}^0_\alpha</math> and <math>\mathbf{\Pi}^0_\alpha</math>.
 
A theorem shows that any set that is <math>\mathbf{\Sigma}^0_\alpha</math> or <math>\mathbf{\Pi}^0_\alpha</math> is <math>\mathbf{\Delta}^0_{\alpha + 1}</math>, and any <math>\mathbf{\Delta}^0_\beta</math> set is both <math>\mathbf{\Sigma}^0_\alpha</math> and <math>\mathbf{\Pi}^0_\alpha</math> for all ''&alpha;'' > ''&beta;''. Thus the hierarchy has the following structure, where arrows indicate inclusion.
 
<{{center>|
<!-- replace this with a diagram -->
<math>
Line 52 ⟶ 53:
\end{matrix}
</math>
}}
</center>
 
=== Regularity properties of Borel sets ===
Line 71 ⟶ 72:
* A set is <math>\mathbf{\Delta}^1_{n}</math> if it is both <math>\mathbf{\Pi}^1_n</math> and <math>\mathbf{\Sigma}^1_n</math> .
 
As with the Borel hierarchy, for each ''n'', any <math>\mathbf{\Delta}^1_n</math> set is both <math>\mathbf{\Sigma}^1_{n+1}</math> and <math>\mathbf{\Pi}^1_{n+1}.</math>.
 
The properties of the projective sets are not completely determined by ZFC. Under the assumption [[axiom of constructibility|''V = L'']], not all projective sets have the perfect set property or the property of Baire. However, under the assumption of [[projective determinacy]], all projective sets have both the perfect set property and the property of Baire. This is related to the fact that ZFC proves [[Borel determinacy]], but not projective determinacy.
 
There are also generic extensions of <math>L</math> for any natural number <math>n>2</math> in which <math>\mathcal P(\omega)\cap L</math> consists of all the lightface <math>\Delta^1_n</math> subsets of <math>\omega</math>.<ref>V. Kanovei, V. Lyubetsky, "[https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7390/8/9/1477 On the <math>\Delta^1_n</math> problem of Harvey Friedman]. In ''Mathematical Logic and its Applications'' (2020), DOI [https://doi.org/10.3390/math8091477 10.3380/math8091477].</ref>
 
More generally, the entire collection of sets of elements of a Polish space ''X'' can be grouped into equivalence classes, known as [[Wadge degree]]s, that generalize the projective hierarchy. These degrees are ordered in the [[Wadge hierarchy]]. The [[axiom of determinacy]] implies that the Wadge hierarchy on any Polish space is well-founded and of length [[Θ (set theory)|Θ]], with structure extending the projective hierarchy.
Line 83 ⟶ 86:
== Effective descriptive set theory ==
 
The area of [[effective descriptive set theory]] combines the methods of descriptive set theory with those of [[generalized recursion theory]] (especially [[hyperarithmetical theory]]). In particular, it focuses on [[lightface]] analogues of hierarchies of classical descriptive set theory. Thus the [[hyperarithmetic hierarchy]] is studied instead of the Borel hierarchy, and the [[analytical hierarchy]] instead of the projective hierarchy. This research is related to weaker versionversions of set theory such as [[Kripke-PlatekKripke–Platek set theory]] and [[second-order arithmetic]].
 
==Table==
 
{{pointclasses}}
 
==See also==
Line 91 ⟶ 98:
 
==References==
* {{cite book | authorlink=Alexander Kechris | author=Kechris, Alexander S. | title=Classical Descriptive Set Theory | url=https://archive.org/details/classicaldescrip0000kech | url-access=registration | publisher=Springer-Verlag | year=1994 | isbn=0-387-94374-9}}
* {{cite book | authorlink=Yiannis N. Moschovakis | author=Moschovakis, Yiannis N. | title=Descriptive Set Theory|url=https://www.math.ucla.edu/~ynm/books.htm | publisher=North Holland | year=1980|page=2 |isbn=0-444-70199-0}} [http://www.math.ucla.edu/~ynm/books.htm Second edition available online]
 
===Citations===
* {{cite book | authorlink=Yiannis N. Moschovakis | author=Moschovakis, Yiannis N. | title=Descriptive Set Theory | publisher=North Holland | year=1980 |isbn=0-444-70199-0}} [http://www.math.ucla.edu/~ynm/books.htm Second edition available online]
{{Reflist}}
 
== External links ==