Content deleted Content added
KslotteBot (talk | contribs) m changing to aan template, consistence for all archives belonging to same talk page; using AWB |
m Bot: Fixing lint errors, replacing obsolete HTML tags: <tt> (5x) Tag: Fixed lint errors |
||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{Automatic archive navigator}}
== Audience and Context. ==
Line 17:
thanks
<small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Pdc&gsc|Pdc&gsc]] ([[User talk:Pdc&gsc|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Pdc&gsc|contribs]]) 00:10, 3 October 2004</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->
== Split this up, JRE & JDK seperated ==
Line 29:
== JVM and JRE ==
What is the differences between them ??. :-? <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:84.121.3.242|84.121.3.242]] ([[User talk:84.121.3.242|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/84.121.3.242|contribs]]) 12:41, 8 November 2004</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->
: JVM is a generic term, see [[Java virtual machine]]. JRE specifically refers to Sun's product, comprising their own JVM implementation and their own Java API implementation. [[User:Smyth|– [[User:Smyth|Smyth]]]] 13:13, 13 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Line 39:
== Responses to the Java Language is outdated ==
The complaints about collections and casting etc in this section are out of date with the generics & auto-unboxing in v1.5 (which are discussed in following section) and I can't see any other point in that section but have a feeling that if I removed it, it would be replaced. Anyone care to fix it?
: Not neccesarily everyone uses Java 1.5 and thus the prblems still remain. Of couse, adding some mention that they were fixed with the release of 1.5 would be nice. -- [[User:TakuyaMurata|Taku]] 18:57, Nov 12, 2004 (UTC)
Line 55:
<blockquote>Java is an object-oriented programming language developed primarily by Sun Microsystems. Gosling and friends initially designed Java, which was called Oak at first (in honour of the trees outside Gosling's office), to replace C++, although the feature set better resembles that of Objective C.</blockquote>
<small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:129.97.152.114|129.97.152.114]] ([[User talk:129.97.152.114|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/129.97.152.114|contribs]]) 03:47, 23 November 2004</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->
== Pronunciation, Round 2 ==
Line 65:
:: Same here, I would pronounce it {{IPA|/ˈdʒ'''ɑ'''və/}}, not {{IPA|/ˈdʒ'''æ'''və/}}. [[User:Poccil|Peter O.]] ([[User Talk:Poccil|Talk]]) 07:51, Jan 14, 2005 (UTC)
:::My bad, I thought the majority was for "short" "a".
: While probably not common amongst English speakers, I've heard Java pronounced as {{IPA|/java/}} (in the Netherlands and Poland) (ie. English spelling 'yava'), matching local pronounciation of the coffee-bean. How consistant is this with the Javanese pronounciation? And how common is this pronounciation in europe? (ie, in German)
:: It's probably needless to say, but in japan "java" becomes jyaba. -- [[User:TakuyaMurata|Taku]] 17:54, Apr 2, 2005 (UTC)
Line 77:
- the Java Community Process ?
<small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:70.114.249.148|70.114.249.148]] ([[User talk:70.114.249.148|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/70.114.249.148|contribs]]) 05:12, 27 February 2005</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->
== [[Strictfp]] ==
Line 123:
**[[JDeveloper | Oracle JDeveloper]]
<small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:212.114.231.48|212.114.231.48]] ([[User talk:212.114.231.48|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/212.114.231.48|contribs]]) 14:48, 13 July 2005</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->
: What is the point of the "Related free software" section, anyway? ISTM it is just bloat that does not add much to the article; at best, it should be moved to a separate article. Objections to me just removing it? [[User:Neilc|Neilc]] 05:18, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
Line 145:
I've pulled the following paragraph from the section on interfaces and classes (sorry I forgot to sign in before making the change):
<blockquote>Methods defined by an interface are implicitly <
Without explanations of the meanings of public, abstract, static, and final, this paragraph adds little value. But, adding the explanations would be adding detail, and this paragraph seems to already be too much detail. [[User:Mark Harrison|Mark Harrison]] 06:28, 11 August 2005 (UTC)
Line 157:
Other bad examples include the deleteAll method. It should use a List instead of an array and should use a for each loop.
<small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:207.58.192.123|207.58.192.123]] ([[User talk:207.58.192.123|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/207.58.192.123|contribs]]) 20:36, 22 August 2005</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->
== TOCleft ==
| |||