Wikipedia:Requests for comment/SPUI: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edits by 211.117.126.89 (talk) to last version by Nlu |
m Bot: Fixing lint errors, replacing obsolete HTML tags: <tt> (1x) Tag: Fixed lint errors |
||
(8 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{shortcut|
In order to remain listed at [[Wikipedia:Requests for comment]], at least two people need to show that they tried to resolve a dispute with this user and have failed. This must involve the ''same'' dispute with a ''single'' user, not different disputes or multiple users. The persons complaining must provide evidence of their efforts, and each of them must certify it by signing this page with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>. If this does not happen within 48 hours of the creation of this dispute page (which was: <
----
*([[User:SPUI|SPUI]] | [[User talk:SPUI|talk]] | [[Special:contributions/SPUI|contributions]])
Line 53:
:# [[User:Gateman1997|Gateman1997]] 05:35, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
:# [[User:JohnnyBGood|JohnnyBGood]] 18:18, 31 March 2006 (UTC) I've tried working with this guy and gotten nothing but smartass replies and grief for it. He doesn't know the meaning of the word "compromise" or the meaning of the word "consensus".
:# [[User:Lbmixpro|LBMixPro]][[User talk:Lbmixpro|<sup><Sp</sup>]][[WP:EA|<
:# -- [[User:Dragoonmac|Dragoonmac]] - <sup><small>[[User_talk:Dragoonmac|If there was a problem]] <b>yo</b> [[Special:Contributions/Dragoonmac|I'll solve it]]</small></sup> 22:12, 3 April 2006 (UTC) (but on a less bright note, Rschen doesn't want to give up any groud either... <sigh>)
Line 77:
:#Very limited endorsement of the portion about how Curps's bot should not have blocking power. No comment on the rest. --[[User:Nlu|Nlu]] ([[User talk:Nlu|talk]]) 08:08, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
:#As above; endorse that Curps' bot should not be blocking. [[User:86.133.241.100|86.133.241.100]] 00:39, 2 April 2006 (UTC)
:#I endorse the greater part of this summary, however Curps' activities serve an crucial function, and a few (easily correctable) false positives are insufficient reason to stop him. If you disagree, check out the block log from 01:11, January 7, 2006 UTC. It will change your perspective on life. — <small>Apr. 2, '06</small> <
:#—[[User:Locke Cole|Locke Cole]] • [[User talk:Locke Cole|t]] • [[Special:Contributions/Locke Cole|c]] 22:13, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
== Fair and balanced view ==
Kick this straight back to [[Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2006-03-12 U.S. Roads]] and slap everyone who edits this page with a trout. Including me. - [[User:Aaron Brenneman|<
Users who endorse this summary (sign with <nowiki>~~~~</nowiki>):
Line 96:
===Users endorsing this view===
#I do endorse my own view. --'''[[User:Rschen7754|Rschen7754]] ([[User_talk:Rschen7754|talk]] - [[Special:Contributions/Rschen7754|contribs]]) ''' 05:38, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
#*I'll assist in mediation if no one screams. - [[User:Aaron Brenneman|<
#--[[User:JohnnyBGood|JohnnyBGood]] 18:18, 31 March 2006 (UTC) I support this view.
#<nowiki></nowiki> — [[User:Rickyrab|Rickyrab]] | [[User talk:Rickyrab|Talk]] 22:38, 31 March 2006 (UTC)
Line 166:
===Users who endorse this summary===
#— <small>Apr. 1, '06</small> <
#—[[User:Locke Cole|Locke Cole]] • [[User talk:Locke Cole|t]] • [[Special:Contributions/Locke Cole|c]] 08:58, 1 April 2006 (UTC) You left out the part where {{admin|Rschen7754}} blocked me for "mass page moves" in violation of a rule he and a few other sysops made up '''on their own''' at [[WP:AN/I]] (in direct violation of [[WP:BLOCK]]; specifically [[WP:BLOCK#When_blocking_may_not_be_used|When blocking may not be used]]). But I endorse everything else. :P
# [[User:Ashibaka|Ashibaka]] <small>[[User talk:Ashibaka|tock]]</small> 16:36, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
# [[User:Atanamir|atanamir]] 23:01, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
# [[User:Grue|<
# '''[[User:AKMask|<
#--[[user:Celestianpower|Cel]]
# [[User talk:FrancisTyers|FrancisTyers]] 15:47, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
|