Wikipedia:VisualEditor/Why/User Test Data: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 22:02, 4 October 2020

Latest revision as of 00:04, 2 October 2024

(33 intermediate revisions by 24 users not shown)

Line 1:

{{VisualEditor navbox}}

{{For|more recent research|m:Research:VisualEditor's effect on newly registered editors/May 2015 study}}

As part of our preparations for the 2013 launch we ran a group of users from [https://www.usertesting.com/ UserTesting .com] through a set of tasks, first eusing the VisualEditor and then using Wikimarkupwiki markup. Some of them had tried to edit in the past; many were total newcomers. The script for the tests can be [[#Script|seen below]]. This is not the only data we are relying on; we are also (and morlymore usefully) [[Wikipedia:VisualEditor/Why/Quantitative data|gathering quantitative data]] from a test on the English-language Wikipedia, in which 50 percent of new users were given the VisualEditor by default.

==Using the source editor==

<div style="font-size: 15px; margin-bottom:5px; line-height:120%" align="center">''"This automatically looks confusing and overwhelming."<br> "There was tons of foreign jargon amidst the content and it looked nothing like how the real page looked." <br>"I don't want to have to learn a new language just to edit Wikipedia."''</div>

When presented with the source editor, users tended to have the same set of problems. Many of these centred around identifying what they were expected to change; with so much markup, they found it difficult to identify things in the markup view that matched what they'd seen when reading the rendered page. Users were also worried by the clutter of the editing interface, particularly the mass of buttons at the bottom of the "save page" window.

Line 16 ⟶ 17:

==Test==

===Script===

Jejdienejwowwjbk

This is a test of a new editing interface for Wikipedia pages. We will be testing whether it is easier to edit Wikipedia using the current editing interface or the new interface.

In this scenario, let's say that you've decided to correct the article "Golden-Crowned Sparrow". Try to make the corrections that we give throughout, and then tell us what parts of the process felt confusing, and whether it was easier or more difficult to make the corrections with the first interface you are presented with, or the second interface.

:Log in as "[account]" with the password "[password]". Then click the "Golden-Crowned Sparrow" link.

:The first sentence is "The Golden-crowned Sparrow (Zonotrichia atricapilla) is a large Turkish sparrow found in the western part of the Middle East."

:Now correct the link "Turkish sparrow" so that it points to "American sparrow" and press the "Review and Save" button. Complete the process of saving changes.

:Scroll down to the bottom of the article. There is a section marked "Further reading".

:Delete the "Further reading" header entirely. Using the toolbar, make the bold text "Theses" into a level 2 header. Do the same for the bold text "Articles". Save your changes.

:Log out (the "log out" link is at the top right on your screen), and log in again as "[username]" with the password "[password]". Go back to the Golden-Crowned Sparrow article. (In case you need it, the link is https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Golden-Crowned_Sparrow).

:Under "description" there is the sentence "Birds with similarly sized gold crown patches are far more likely to engage in agonistic behavior".

:Below that is the section "Similar species". The title for that section ("Similar species") is less prominent than the title for other sections. Push the 'edit' button, and make the section title the same size as the section title for "description". Save your changes.

===Questions===