Three-point estimation: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 10:16, 8 June 2021

Latest revision as of 11:11, 3 October 2024

(6 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)

Line 1:

{{Short description|Technique used in management and information systems}}

The '''three-point estimation''' technique is used in management and [[information systems]] applications for the construction of an approximate [[probability distribution]] representing the outcome of future events, based on very limited information. While the distribution used for the approximation might be a [[normal distribution]], this is not always so. and, forFor example, a [[triangular distribution]] might be used, depending on the application.

In three-point estimation, three figures are produced initially for every distribution that is required, based on prior experience or best-guesses:

Line 14 ⟶ 15:

''E'' is a [[weighted average]] which takes into account both the most optimistic and most pessimistic estimates provided. SD measures the variability or uncertainty in the estimate.

In ProjectProgram Evaluation and Review Techniques ([[PERT]]) the three values are used to fit a [[PERT distribution]] for [[Monte Carlo Method|Monte Carlo]] simulations.

The [[triangular distribution]] is also commonly used. It differs from the [[Double-triangular distribution|double-triangular]] by its simple triangular shape and by the property that the mode does not have to coincide with the median. The mean ([[expected value]]) is then:

: ''E'' = (''a'' + ''m'' + ''b'') / 3.

Line 35 ⟶ 36:

* The 95% confidence interval for the true project work time is approximately E(project) ± 2 × SD(project)

* The 99.7% confidence interval for the true project work time is approximately E(project) ± 3 × SD(project)

* Information Systems typically uses the 95% confidence interval for all project and task estimates.<ref>[[68-95-9968–95–99.7 rule]]</ref>

These confidence interval estimates assume that the data from all of the tasks combine to be approximately normal (see [[Asymptotic distribution#Asymptotic normality|asymptotic normality]]). Typically, there would need to be 20&ndash;30 tasks for this to be reasonable, and each of the estimates E for the individual tasks would have to be unbiased.

Line 49 ⟶ 50:

{{Reflist}}

==External links==

*[http://www.4pm.com/articles/PERT_program_evaluation_&_review_technique.pdf Risk and duration estimates: 3 point estimating] from www.4pm.com

{{Project cost estimation methods}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Three-Point Estimation}}