Talk:Meta-modeling technique: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}.
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|
{{MEEproj}}
{{WikiProject Method engineering}}
 
}}
== Specificity ==
[[Meta-model|Meta-modeling]] is a fairly general field. This article seems to be describing a very specific instance of meta-modeling, rather than a general technique. Is there any way to make the article name more specific to the techniwue it is describing? Something like "Meta-modeling technique for development processes"? --[[User:Allan McInnes|Allan McInnes]] <small>([[User talk:Allan McInnes|talk]])</small> 18:15, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
 
Upon reflection, I think it would be better if this article was ''generalized'' to cover more than just the single meta-modeling technique described here. There are a number of other approaches to meta-modeling that might be compared and contrasted, as evidenced by [http://72www.14google.203.104com/search?q=cache:rl6wEmpdcsQJ:moncs.cs.mcgill.ca/people/ylu/research/readingProject/report.pdf+meta-modelling+techniques&hl=en&gl=us&ct=clnk&cd=6 this report]. --[[User:Allan McInnes|Allan McInnes]] <small>([[User talk:Allan McInnes|talk]])</small> 18:24, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
 
Agree with the above comments. Metamodeling arguably originated with IRDS and CDIF, and has reached its fullest maturity in the thought leadership of the OMG. This is a particular spin on the topic and quite misleading as such. I put the following intro in the article but decided it was best left until someone could do it right: