Talk:Business cycle and User:DoSiDo: Difference between pages

Revision as of 10:49, 28 February 2006

Revision as of 02:59, 23 April 2007

Line 1:

{{Userboxtop|}}

__TOC__

{{User:The Raven's Apprentice/Userboxes/User Chemistry}}

==Communist Manifesto==

{{User VG-1}}

"It's interesting to note that Marx and Engels' [[1848]] specific demands in the [[Communist Manifesto]] are now almost wholly implemented throughout the once-capitalist world, with the sole exception of the abolishment of rents in land. This suggests that the Marxian analysis found some traction among decision-makers in the late 19th and early 20th centuries."

{{Userboxbottom}}

==TO DO==

I deleted that. First, it isn't logical. If I accurately predict rain tomorrow, it doesn't follow I had any "traction" in the clouds, only that I understood enough about the underlying processes to predict where they were going.

*[http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Chemical_images_that_should_use_vector_graphics Chemical images that should use vector graphics]

*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Chemistry/Image_Request WikiProject Chemistry/Image Request]

*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Chemistry_pages_needing_pictures Category:Chemistry pages needing pictures]

*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Drugs/Structural_diagrams WikiProject Pharmacology/Structural diagrams]

==Chem==

Second, it isn't even relevant to the specific issue of the business cycle. Did those items help modify the swings of the business cycle, or compound them, or neither? --[[User:Christofurio|Christofurio]] 15:13, Jun 15, 2004 (UTC)

===References / Links===

Certainly it is undeniable.

*[http://www.cas.org/EO/regsys.html CAS REGISTRY Overview]

*[http://openbabel.sourceforge.net/ Open Babel: A Package to Decypher Computational Chemistry]

*[http://www.emolecules.com/ eMolecules Chemical Search]

*[http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Molecules Molecules]

*[http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Molecule Molecule]

===Software===

:Which is undeniable? The first of the quoted sentences or the second. The second seems, to me, quite eminently deniable. --[[User:Christofurio|Christofurio]] 23:23, Apr 16, 2005 (UTC)

*[http://jmol.sourceforge.net/ Jmol]

*[http://www.acdlabs.com/download/ ChemSketch]

*[http://www.chemaxon.com/marvin/ CML MarvinView]

*[http://bkchem.zirael.org/download_en.html BK Chem]

*[http://www.inkscape.org/ Inkscape]

**from ChemSketch, export as TIFF or WMF, then import in Inkscape

===CML===

==Overlap with [[economic cycle]]==

*[http://wwmm.ch.cam.ac.uk/moin/ChemicalMarkupLanguage ChemicalMarkupLanguage]

this page overlaps with and thus repeats much of what appears in "the economic cycle". Shouldn't they be merged and one erased?

*[http://www.ch.ic.ac.uk/rzepa/chimeral/resources/cml/chimeral/index.html Index of CML Molecule]

[[User:Jdevine|Jdevine]] 19:42, 30 Jul 2004 (UTC)

*[http://www.ch.ic.ac.uk/rzepa/talks/eth05/ Chemical Semantic Web: publishing & CMLRSS]

:[[Economic cycle]] now redirects here. [[User:Rd232|Rd232]] ^{[[user talk:rd232|talk]]} 00:48, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

*[http://wwmm.ch.cam.ac.uk/moin/CmlRss CmlRss]

*[http://www.randomfactory.com/cml.html CML Reference Collection]

*[http://cml.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php/Main_Page CML Wiki]

===Import Test===

==Multiplier-Accelerator Effect==

[[Image:amlodipine.svg]]

Should the Multiplier-Accelerator effect be included in this or is it under a different name and I'm too tired to see it?--[[User:Tiresais|Tiresais]] 14:16, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

:They have their own articles: [[Accelerator effect]] and [[Multiplier (economics)]]. Not sure how much overlap there is right now. [[User:Rd232|Rd232]] ^{[[user talk:rd232|talk]]} 00:48, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

==Obscurity==

I'd say this article is cluttered. In one sense, from the terse descriptions of each school of thought listed in what seems like no particular order, and in another, its willingness to concede those terms outlining causality (e.g. full employment-- extraneous technical terms) which are, within Wikipedia, obscure. For example, it attempts to explain how fluctuation may be linked to [[full employment]] without defining what full employment might mean in each specific case. Speaking as a layman, it is difficult to follow, and it reads POV to me as well. [[User:Bordello|Bordello]] 10:49, 28 February 2006 (UTC)