Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
m Reverted 1 edit by 2800:CD0:3168:F4E9:BB64:C861:33B3:B17B (talk) to last revision by MrOllie |
||
| (18 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{WikiProject
{{WikiProject Computing |importance=Mid |software=y |software-importance=Mid}} }}
==Befunge?==
Line 40 ⟶ 42:
CiaranG I agree with you but I belive we should have an article which contains a list of software related to Visual Programming regardless of their noticeability. If you agree I'd be welcome in creating and maintaining such a list because visual programming is one of my main interests and I'm planning to support this "movement". [[User:Metalpasman|Metalpasman]] 16:38, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
:Wikipedia is not the place to maintain a list of non-notable software - please see [[WP:NOTE]] and [[WP:VERIFY]]. You could create such a list, but anything non-notable would end up being removed, which would defeat the object. Fortunately, there are many places where you could work on maintaining such a list - see here for example: {{tlp|dmoz|Computers/Programming/Languages/Visual/|Visual Programming Languages}} Cheers, [[User:CiaranG|CiaranG]] 17:01, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
:: My understanding of the [[WP:NOTEWORTHY]] guideline and the [[WP:LSC]] guideline is that when an article contains a list of items, each item on the list should be verifiable, but "Elements of a list don't have to be notable". --[[User:DavidCary|DavidCary]] ([[User talk:DavidCary|talk]]) 03:44, 18 December 2014 (UTC)
Line 183 ⟶ 185:
It would be great if we had a 'History' section here. Obviously there are a plethora of these languages now, but it would be interesting to highlight the the earliest examples. It's clear if you are familiar with a few of these that there must be some common precedents inspiring them. [[User:Walkersam|Walkersam]] ([[User talk:Walkersam|talk]]) 17:50, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
== Should we add Fancade? ==
[https://fancade.com Fancade] is an app created by an indie developer (Martin Magni), which is a visual programming language for creating 3D (and 2D) games. It also a section where you can play games created by others. It's a mobile app, but you can also use it in the online version (with some great improvements for use with a keyboard and mouse). I'm not sure if it's big enough to put it here, cause it doesn't have a wikipedia page. [[User:Ego-lay atman-bay|Ego-lay atman-bay]] ([[User talk:Ego-lay atman-bay|talk]]) 20:22, 1 June 2022 (UTC)
== Gladiabots ==
[https://store.steampowered.com/app/871930/GLADIABOTS__AI_Combat_Arena/ Gladiabots] is a game where one does programming (mostly one defines pretty refined [[Decision tree|decision trees]] that tend actually to a graph as there are methods too). Could it be included? [[User:Pier4r|Pier4r]] ([[User talk:Pier4r|talk]]) 19:38, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
== Zaluum ==
Looks (from few screenshots i saw) simmilar to LabVIEW. Isn't maintained anymore. It was in alpha stage. Last working snapshot of website is avaiable on web archive in 09 jun 2023 (http://web.archive.org/web/20230609152955/http://zaluum.com/). Github repositories are still there (https://github.com/zaluum).
I think that it is worth mentioning. I would add it to this wiki page but idk how to classify it (on website first sentace says "Open source visual language for real-time data processing.").
I found it by looking at this LabVIEW forum thread: https://forums.ni.com/t5/LabVIEW/Can-I-create-own-graphical-programming-IDE-inspired-by-LabVIEW/td-p/3975267
[[User:XDanieI|XDanieI]] ([[User talk:XDanieI|talk]]) 21:46, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
:There's not a lot we can do with github repos and forum posts. Wikipedia is based on [[WP:RS|reliably published]] sources. And the lists here specifically are of languages with preexisting Wikipedia articles. You'd need several higher quality sources to create an article (see [[WP:N]]). [[User:MrOllie|MrOllie]] ([[User talk:MrOllie|talk]]) 22:02, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
::I mean, there is "MakeCode Arcade, by Microsoft" which does not have wiki article. Sorry for being ignorant (I didn't read whole "reliably published sources" that ypu linked" but doesn't the web archive link and github link proove that this programming language exists (and can be downloaded and run; but is not maintained) which is the whole point? [[User:XDanieI|XDanieI]] ([[User talk:XDanieI|talk]]) 10:54, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
:::No, proof of existence is not sufficient. [[User:MrOllie|MrOllie]] ([[User talk:MrOllie|talk]]) 11:51, 18 July 2024 (UTC)
| |||