Content deleted Content added
→Readability: more |
m Maintain {{WPBS}}: 1 WikiProject template. Create {{WPBS}}. Keep majority rating "Start" in {{WPBS}}. Remove 1 same rating as {{WPBS}} in {{WikiProject Biophysics}}. (Category:Articles with WikiProject banners but without a banner shell) Tag: |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{WikiProject
{{WikiProject Biophysics|importance=High}}
}}
This page is now under construction, and would welcome edits. After discussion, it has been named just "Structure validation", with a redirect from "Macromolecular structure validation". [[User:Dcrjsr|Dcrjsr]] ([[User talk:Dcrjsr|talk]]) 17:12, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
Line 16 ⟶ 17:
:I had a go at putting something of that sort in the intro, but found it worked better to modify the small-molecule paragraph that starts the history section. [[User:Dcrjsr|Dcrjsr]] ([[User talk:Dcrjsr|talk]]) 23:02, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
::The point here are not small molecules, but telling something like this: ''Validation of experimental structures of biological macromolecules is important because they are determined with a relatively low precision (around +-0.3 A for for a good resolution crystal structure and +-1.5 A for solution NMR models ?)''. Let's also check if I understood this correctly: "The validation has three aspects: 1) checking on the validity of the thousands to millions of measurements in the experiment..." Are we talking about evaluating quality of data prior to generating models? For example, one can not expect a good quality all-atom structure from 6A resolution EM data, orientational constraints by solid state NMR or IR data. [[User:My very best wishes|My very best wishes]] ([[User talk:My very best wishes|talk]]) 14:08, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
More on readability: The historical summary is pretty technical. It might be better to have the history at the end of the article, or at least preceded by an Introduction section. [[User:RockMagnetist|RockMagnetist]] ([[User talk:RockMagnetist|talk]]) 23:15, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
:I see the point. I've made the wording less technical in many places, and will work on that further as this goes along, since it would be nice to feel we could keep it at the beginning. [[User:Dcrjsr|Dcrjsr]] ([[User talk:Dcrjsr|talk]]) 00:46, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
== Citation template ==
Line 30 ⟶ 36:
:::Another word of explanation: Unfortunately, the default citation anchors only work if you use {{para|last1}}, {{para|first1}}, etc., for the author names instead of {{para|authors}}. It's probably easier to use {{Tl|harvid}}. For example, if you have the citation <nowiki>{{harvnb|Rupp|2009}}</nowiki>, you can use <nowiki>|ref={{harvid|Rupp|2009}}</nowiki> in your reference. Just change harvnb to harvid. [[User:RockMagnetist|RockMagnetist]] ([[User talk:RockMagnetist|talk]]) 23:11, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
::::I moved Engh&Huber out of the Further reading, since it's a short & specialized paper. Hope I did it correctly! [[User:Dcrjsr|Dcrjsr]] ([[User talk:Dcrjsr|talk]]) 00:47, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
| |||