Talk:Formstack: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Assessment: banner shell (Rater)
 
(7 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|1=
}}
 
== Smells like an advert ==
Or is it just me? <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/82.21.186.20|82.21.186.20]] ([[User talk:82.21.186.20#top|talk]]) 21:22, 5 July 2022 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
 
 
{{oldafdfull| date = 18 April 2010 (UTC) | result = '''keep''' | page = Formstack }}
 
I understand that this page has formerly been deleted. I now feel that it has enough information to deserve a Wikipedia page and is up to standards. If anyone disputes this, please edit the page to make it up to standards, or post about it here.
 
Line 16 ⟶ 25:
:Why not just split the article? --[[User:Torritorri|TorriTorri]]<sup>([[User talk:Torritorri|Talk to me!]])</sup> 23:16, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
::Because Formstack is not notable independent of Formspring.--[[User:CastAStone|CastAStone]][[User talk:CastAStone|/<sup>/(talk)</sup>]] 04:52, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
 
== removed deletion tag & edited article ==
I changed the article to a redirect because FormStack isn't as notable as formspring.me and it works better this way. Being a redirect page, the deletion tag isn't needed anymore.
 
Why hasn't this been deleted? Absolutely nothing about this article is encyclopedic or significant. Wikipedia is not to be used for personal website advertising. I had a previous page deleted for this exact reason. And there is not significant media coverage. [[User:Jakobees|Jakobees]] ([[User talk:Jakobees|talk]]) 04:54, 3 March 2011 (UTC)