Content deleted Content added
m Signing comment by 31.17.92.45 - "→Which definition of the Euler angles is being employed in this page?: " |
Ebernardes (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 32:
This article is frustrating because it pretends a hands-on appeal ("just pick up the equations and use them for your project") when in fact they are plainly incorrect. I only noticed it when GPT pointed me to where it came up with those inconclusive equations; so you are doing a lot of damage here. I propose we pull this article offline until it is correct and verified to be correct. And since we can verify correctness of algebra, I would suggest we go ahead and do this for all Wikipedia articles that feature any formulas. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/31.17.92.45|31.17.92.45]] ([[User talk:31.17.92.45#top|talk]]) 11:21, 29 October 2024 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:Totally agree, this page does not make much sense.
:I personally think this page should be scrapped, condensed to a little section called "conversion between ZYX Tait-Bryan angles and quaternions" that only gives out the equations, explains why this sequence is being given particular interest (because it's the most used) and then add it to the main page called [[Quaternions and spatial rotation]].
:This would be MUCH less confusing, in my opinion, and still gives the formula in a "just pick up the equations and use them for your project" way, albeit more explicitly. [[User:Ebernardes|Ebernardes]] ([[User talk:Ebernardes|talk]]) 11:44, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
== Order of angles specified? ==
| |||