Content deleted Content added
→top: promotional |
|||
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{multiple issues|
{{prose|date=February 2012}}
{{
}}
[[File:EAAF Maturity levels.jpg|thumb|320px|EAAF Maturity levels]]
Line 9:
== Overview ==
The OMB Enterprise Architecture Assessment Framework (the Framework) helps [[Office of Management and Budget|OMB]] and the [[List of United States federal agencies|agencies]] assess the capability of enterprise architecture programs to guide [[Information technology|IT]] investments.<ref>[https://web.archive.org/web/20170121152604/https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/omb/e-gov/FEA Federal Enterprise Architecture],{{dead link|date=February 2017}} Office of Management and Budget, USA.</ref> It helps to understand the current state of an
Enterprise Architecture Assessment Framework (EAAF) version 3.1 identifies the measurement areas and criteria by which agencies are expected to use the EA to drive performance improvements that result in the following outcomes:<ref name="eaaf"/>
Line 21:
While agencies have demonstrated a degree of maturity and competency in developing and using their EAs, EAAF seeks to advance the practice of EA, particularly through the development and use of agency segment architectures, aimed at driving the kinds of government-wide outcomes.<ref name="OBM09">US OBM (2009). [https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/omb/assets/fea_docs/OMB_EA_Assessment_Framework_v3_1_June_2009.pdf Improving Agency Performance Using Information and Information Technology : Enterprise Architecture Assessment Framework v3.1] June 2009</ref>
== Performance
Government agencies assess current performance, identifying opportunities for improvement, and translate them into specific actions. Enterprise architecture is an integrated management practice that helps the use of an
[[File:Information and IT-Enabled Performance Improvement Lifecycle.jpg|600px|thumb|center|Information and IT-
Continuous performance improvement is the principal driver connecting EA program staff with business stakeholders across each phase of the
* identify and prioritize enterprise segments and opportunities to improve mission performance, linked to agency goals and objectives;
* plan a course of action to close performance gaps, using common or shared information assets and information technology assets;
Line 32:
* measure and assess performance to verify and report results; and
* assess feedback on program performance to enhance architecture, investment and implementation decisions.
Opportunities to improve mission performance are prioritized in terms of their relative value to the
=== Architect ===
Enterprise architecture describes the current (baseline) and future (target) states of the agency, and the plan to transition from the current to the future state, with a focus on agency strategy, program performance improvements and information technology investments. Agency EAs are organized by segments – core mission areas (e.g., homeland security, health), business service (e.g., financial management, human resources), and enterprise services (e.g., Information Sharing). Segments are defined using the [[Federal Enterprise Architecture]] (FEA) reference models
=== Invest ===
Performance improvement opportunities identified during the
=== Implement ===
Projects are executed and tracked throughout the [[system development life cycle]] (SDLC). Achievement of the program / project plan within acceptable variance for schedule and budget is measured and reported through [[
=== Measure, assess and improve ===
Line 47:
Information and information technology, as critical enablers of program performance improvements, must be assessed and evaluated in the context of agency missions and outcome-oriented results defined in the enterprise-wide performance architecture.<ref name="OBM09"/>
Performance improvement plans and priorities, including those previously gathered under the PART and Performance Assessment Report (PAR) programs, are reflected in the agency EA, particularly the performance architecture and ETP. Performance metrics previously gathered are used to evaluate the results in agency performance improvement plans, identifying a
=== Agency submission data quality ===
OMB collects a significant amount of IT investment data and other related data from executive agencies during each phase of Performance Improvement Lifecycle. OMB uses the information for development of an IT investment portfolio as a part of the
==See also==
|