Complex network zeta function: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Citation bot (talk | contribs)
Add: pmid, authors 1-1. Removed parameters. Some additions/deletions were parameter name changes. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Dominic3203 | Category:Articles with math errors | #UCB_Category 13/29
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1:
Different definitions have been given for the dimension of a [[complex network]] or [[graph theory|graph]]. For example, [[Metric dimension (graph theory)|metric dimension]] is defined in terms of the resolving set for a graph. Dimension has also been [[Fractal dimension on networks|defined]] based on the [[Minkowski–Bouligand dimension|box covering method]] applied to graphs.<ref name=goh>{{cite journal | lastlast1=Goh | firstfirst1=K.-I. | last2=Salvi | first2=G. | last3=Kahng | first3=B. | last4=Kim | first4=D. | title=Skeleton and Fractal Scaling in Complex Networks | journal=Physical Review Letters | publisher=American Physical Society (APS) | volume=96 | issue=1 | date=2006-01-11 | issn=0031-9007 | doi=10.1103/physrevlett.96.018701 | page=018701| pmid=16486532 |arxiv=cond-mat/0508332}}</ref> Here we describe the definition based on the '''complex network zeta function'''.<ref name="Shankerb">{{cite journal|author=O. Shanker|year=2007|title=Graph Zeta Function and Dimension of Complex Network|journal=Modern Physics Letters B|volume= 21|pages=639–644|doi=10.1142/S0217984907013146 | issue=11|bibcode=2007MPLB...21..639S}}</ref> This generalises the definition based on the scaling property of the volume with distance.<ref name="Shankera">{{cite journal|author=O. Shanker|year=2007|title=Defining Dimension of a Complex Network |journal=Modern Physics Letters B|volume= 21|pages=321–326|doi=10.1142/S0217984907012773 | issue=6|bibcode=2007MPLB...21..321S}}</ref> The best definition depends on the application.
 
==Definition==
Line 13:
:<math> \langle k \rangle = \lim_{\alpha \rightarrow \infty} \zeta_G ( \alpha ). </math>
 
The need for taking an average over all nodes can be avoided by using the concept of supremum over nodes, which makes the concept much easier to apply for formally infinite graphs.<ref name="ShankerTCS">{{cite journal|author=O. Shanker|year=2010|title=Complex Network Dimension and Path Counts|journal=Theoretical Computer Science|volume= 411|pages=2454–2458|doi=10.1016/j.tcs.2010.02.013|issue=26–28|doi-access=free}}</ref> The definition can be expressed as a weighted sum over the node distances. This gives the Dirichlet series relation
 
:<math> \zeta_G ( \alpha ) = \sum_r S(r)/r^{\alpha}. </math>