Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Skomorokh: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
MalnadachBot (talk | contribs) m Fixed Lint errors. (Task 12) |
m Fixing Lint errors from Wikipedia:Linter/Signature submissions (Task 31) Tags: Fixed lint errors paws [2.2] |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 152:
#'''Support''' - Trusted editor. [[User:King of Hearts|King of]] [[User:King of Hearts|<span style="color:red;">♥</span>]] [[User talk:King of Hearts|<span style="color:red;">♦</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/King of Hearts|<span style="color:black;">♣</span>]] ♠ 23:07, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
#'''Support''' No problems here. Good luck! [[User:Pastor Theo|Pastor Theo]] ([[User talk:Pastor Theo|talk]]) 23:28, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Could have sworn he was one. [[User:GlassCobra|<
#Not going to join in the "best editor ever" chorus above, but no obvious problems and would probably have a use for it. – [[User:Iridescent|<span style="color:#E45E05;">iride</span>]][[User talk:Iridescent|<span style="color:#C1118C;">scent</span>]] 00:27, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
#Thought he was one, probably will wield the mop nicely, even though I had a [[User_talk:Skomorokh/ङ#Re:_Communism_and_religion_edits|~meh]] experience with him. [[User:Bsimmons666|'''Bsimmons<font color="#990000">666</font>''']] ([[User_talk:Bsimmons666|talk]]) 00:49, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
Line 167:
#'''Support''' - I have been waiting for this one. [[User:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#4E562C;font-weight:bold">Tiptoety</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Tiptoety|<span style="color:#FFDB58">talk</span>]]</sup> 04:58, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
#'''Support''' I think [[User:Gwen Gale|Gwen Gale]] said it quite well: "I trust Skomorokh." ---<font face="Georgia">'''[[User:RepublicanJacobite|<span style="color:#009900">RepublicanJacobite</span>]]'''<sub>''[[User talk:RepublicanJacobite|<span style="color:#006600">The'FortyFive'</span>]]''</sub></font> 05:03, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
#'''Support''' From what I see you're a highly insightful and fair editor; even, per the neutral comment, towards ostracized groups of editors. I fully trust you with the tools. '''[[User:Themfromspace|<
#This RfA just made my day. Skomorokh has been someone who's made a huge imprint on me, an imprint of a hard working, dedicated, civil, humble, clueful, prolific, capable, insightful, and reasonable editor (what a mouthful). His article contributions are simply outstanding, and he manages to combine his article contributions with his other edits very nicely. It appears that he's not easily burned out, and can be a good admin for a while. I have complete confidence in him, and as such, I'm supporting his RfA. <small>([[User:X!|<span style="color:gray">X!</span>]] · [[User talk:X!|<span style="color:gray">talk</span>]]) · [[Swatch Internet Time|@285]] · </small> 05:50, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
#'''Support''' I wouldn't normally vote in a 62/0/0.999999 situation, but the quality of this production deserves my time to hit the edit button and pile on. '''[[User:Wadester16|<span style="color:darkred">wadester</span>]][[User talk:Wadester16|<span style="color:darkblue">16</span>]]''' 06:27, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
Line 194:
#'''Support''' I think he'll be an excellent admin! [[User:Ethan a dawe|Ethan a dawe]] ([[User talk:Ethan a dawe|talk]]) 19:09, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
#'''Support''', would be a great asset to the overall project. [[User:Redthoreau|<font color="#FF3333">'''Red'''</font><font color="#FFCC00">'''thoreau'''</font>]] ([[User talk:Redthoreau|talk]])RT 19:12, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Totally. Level headed, pragmatic editor who is clearly here for the right reasons. A pleasure to add to the pile on :) <small><span style="border:1px solid #0000ff;padding:1px;">[[User:Pedro|<b>Pedro</b>]] : [[User_talk:Pedro|<
#'''Support''' Already acts like one, might as well make it official ;-) [[User:J.delanoy|<span style="color:green;">J'''.'''delanoy</span>]][[User Talk:J.delanoy|<sup style="color:red;">gabs</sup>]][[Special:Contributions/J.delanoy|<sub style="color:blue;">adds</sub>]] 21:57, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
#Why the hell not? [[User:Pmlinediter|<span style="font-family:Arial;color:blue">Pmlin</span>]][[User_talk:Pmlinediter|<span style="font-family:Verdana;color:#800000">editor</span>]] 07:36, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
Line 215:
#'''Support''' I came accross the user on the wiki project vandalism studies and liked the thought he puts into his essays. I have not found a reason not to support. I think the user is very engaging and throughly thinks through problems. Full support [[User:Ottawa4ever|Ottawa4ever]] ([[User talk:Ottawa4ever|talk]]) 20:13, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Great editor who is well qualified to be an administrator. [[User:Vision Thing|-- Vision]] [[User_talk:Vision_Thing|Thing --]] 20:47, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
#'''Support''' No problems. [[User talk:Triplestop|'''<
#'''Support''' — [[User:Malik Shabazz|Malik Shabazz]] {{toolbar|separator=dot|[[User talk:Malik Shabazz|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Malik Shabazz|contribs]] }} 21:23, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
#''' Support''' <b>[[User:Will Beback|<span style="color:#595454;">Will Beback</span>]] [[User talk:Will Beback|<span style="color:#C0C0C0;">talk</span>]] </b> 21:34, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
Line 221:
#'''Support''' – I thought he was one already. His conduct around the wiki, where i've encountered it, has been excellent. I can't recall any negative experiences that i've had with Skomorokh. <span style="font-family:Copperplate Gothic Bold">[[User:Firestorm|<span style="color:black">'''''Firestorm'''''</span>]] <sup>[[User talk:Firestorm|<span style="color:red">'''''Talk'''''</span>]]</sup></span> 22:26, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Fully qualified candidate. [[User:Newyorkbrad|Newyorkbrad]] ([[User talk:Newyorkbrad|talk]]) 22:52, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
#'''Support''' per Newyorkbrad. ;) '''[[User:IMatthew|<span style="font-family:Century Gothic;color:#000080">iMatthew</span>]] <span style="font-family:Century Gothic;color:#007BA7">[[User_talk:IMatthew|<span style="font-family:Century Gothic;color:#007BA7"><sup>talk</sup></span>]]</span>''' at 23:22, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
#'''Support''' Excellent user '''[[User:YellowMonkey|<
#This guy is great. And the lone neutral is laughable at best. [[User:Crotchety Old Man|Crotchety Old Man]] ([[User talk:Crotchety Old Man|talk]]) 01:45, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. I recognize this candidate only from work on his or her successful [[William Gibson]] FA. Smart and great user. -[[User:SusanLesch|SusanLesch]] ([[User talk:SusanLesch|talk]]) 03:17, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
Line 231:
#Support. The candidate appears to be here to do what is necessary, what is compatible with the goal of the project, and what is clueful. —<strong>[[User:Anonymous Dissident|<span style="font-family:Script MT Bold;color:DarkRed">Anonymous Dissident</span>]]</strong>[[User_talk:Anonymous Dissident|<sup><span style="font-family:Verdana;color:Gray">Talk</span></sup>]] 14:27, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
#:<s>Support. Credit where it is due. [[User:Peter Damian|Peter Damian]] ([[User talk:Peter Damian|talk]]) 15:36, 10 July 2009 (UTC)</s> Back to oppose. I have a very uneasy feeling about this one. [[User:Peter Damian|Peter Damian]] ([[User talk:Peter Damian|talk]]) 17:18, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
#'''Support''' - Calm, conscientious, rational. And writes well too! Has the temperament and competencies for the job. Unreservedly trust him. —[[User:Mattisse|<
#'''Support''' Certainly. [[User:Shappy|Meetare Shappy]] <sup>[[User Talk:Shappy|''Cunkelfratz!'']]</sup> 17:27, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
#'''Yes'''. No problems here. A good, solid content contributor and apparent knowledge of policy. [[User:Cool3|Cool3]] ([[User talk:Cool3|talk]]) 18:43, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
#'''Support'''— '''[[User:Daedalus969|<
#:<s>'''Support''' Knowledgeable, balanced and has a calm temperament. Good understanding of RS and NPOV. Need more of his ilk! [[User:Abecedare|Abecedare]] ([[User talk:Abecedare|talk]]) 23:48, 10 July 2009 (UTC)</s>
#::I am striking my !vote because I find the wording of comments like [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Skomorokh&diff=301595641&oldid=301595292 the second part of this one] <small>("What is problematic about describing the Holocaust as something that is believed in? Is the minority opinion on the issue not termed 'Holocast denial'?")</small> troubling, and I have not looked into the editing history of Skomorokh deeply enough to know if this is just a matter of casual phrasing for rhetorical impact, or if it represents a more fundamental difference in our understanding what is NPOV and encyclopedic. [[User:Abecedare|Abecedare]] ([[User talk:Abecedare|talk]]) 00:37, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
Line 248:
#[[User:Kusma|Kusma]] ([[User talk:Kusma|talk]]) 06:28, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
# I'm [[User:Mailer diablo|Mailer Diablo]] and of course I '''approve''' this message! - 10:04, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Definitely a net positive. [[User_talk:Benjiboi| -- <u style="font-size:14px; font-family: cursive;color:#8000FF">Banj<
#'''Support'''. net positive. If problems ''do'' occur, folks know where to come :) [[User:Casliber|Casliber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 00:49, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
#'''Support'''. Absolutely. I've had nothing but good interaction with Skomorokh, who is among the smartest editors I know, and I like the way he is willing to think outside the box, however provocative that may be. --[[User:Jbmurray|jbmurray]] ([[User talk:Jbmurray|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jbmurray|contribs]]) 03:38, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
| |||