Content deleted Content added
→ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message: new section Tag: |
|||
| (36 intermediate revisions by 17 users not shown) | |||
Line 4:
==[[User:Dream Focus]]==
Since you seem to be a member of the Article Rescue Squadron. I'd like to introduce you this user Dream Focus if you haven't heard of him already. He's one of those that takes saving articles really seriously. [[User:Jhenderson777|Jhenderson777]] ([[User talk:Jhenderson777|talk]]) 18:50, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
:Thanks, though I would not contact him unless he showed interest in the article already. As you probably already know, according to [[Wikipedia:Canvassing]], contacting editors for the sake of voting is considered disruptive. Anyhow, I've changed my vote for the article we've been working on, so now there is consensus for merging. At least it seems our work won't go to complete waste. —[[User:Codehydro|<
::I know about [[WP:Canvassing]]. I wasn't really introducing him for that particular article. Because I figured you try to help to save other articles too. I figure it's just good to share some similarities and know a few of your squadron members who work together on the same thing. [[User:Jhenderson777|Jhenderson777]] ([[User talk:Jhenderson777|talk]]) 00:54, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
:::Thanks for the suggestion; actually, I saw and worked with him just now as we rescued the article [[The Silver Ship and the Sea]] :) —[[User:Codehydro|<
==FreeRice grain totals==
Line 26:
Thanks for improving the Elfwood page at Wikipedia! /Thomas, Elfwood founder <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/88.131.68.194|88.131.68.194]] ([[User talk:88.131.68.194|talk]]) 12:41, 16 August 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:You're welcome. [[Elfwood]] seems like a nice community. Saving noteworthy subjects from article deletion is my hobby, though I'll have to visit Elfwood for non-research purposes someday if I ever feel like drawing fantasy ;) —[[User:Codehydro|<
== For you ==
Line 36:
|style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Article Rescue Barnstar'''
|-
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 3px solid gray;" | For your amazing work on improving the [[Cairo International Model United Nations]] article while it's at AfD, making it a far better article than it was when it was first nominated, I award you this.
|}
:Thanks Silversiren! Hey, we have similar tastes in signature colors ;) Now hopefully they close that AfD as a keep soon... —[[User:Codehydro|<
::They did. :D
==[[Galactic quadrant]]==
Line 52:
Nice work on the article. With some more content, you can go for DYK. --[[User:Ragib|Ragib]] ([[User talk:Ragib|talk]]) 00:40, 23 August 2010 (UTC)
:Thanks, I hadn't thought about doing that, though I may have to wait a little while on it as I am working on several other articles at the same time. Maybe I'll spam the DYK with 4 of my articles at the same time :) —[[User:Codehydro|<
I expanded the article slightly, though mostly on the notes side. It seems that sources from just 5 years ago are showing signs of being outdated since the arrival of the Qawmi Education Board at that time greatly changed things around. Would you take a look at the notes I made on the [[Qawmi]] article? I'd like to know what you think. By the way, I just finished major expansion on [[sleep state misperception]] to get it promoted to DYK ;) (also, I am not putting the talkback template on your talk because you seem to be watching my talk already after reading the section below) —[[User:Codehydro|<
:I added the number of Madrasahs at different levels under the board. But there seems to be a misprint in the newspaper (ref: dstar1), since it mentions sanaria ammah level twice - once as higher secondary(?) and again as secondary. Can you please check the numbers from the newspaper and other sources? 4 million is a huge number of students for any education system, but it makes sense, since the poorest of the poor who can't afford to send their children to regular schools, usually send them to these local religious schools. --[[User:Ragib|Ragib]] ([[User talk:Ragib|talk]]) 05:24, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
::Oh, great idea! I didn't really understand what those numbers meant when I first read it until I saw your list. I reorganized it into a table and found a better source. I think the University of Oxford is much more reliable than dstar :) And I would have never guessed that "Befaqul Mudarressin" is the same as "Wafaq ul Madaris"... I thought they were two separate things at first, but noticed surprising similarities in the numbers of schools at each level and then slowly tried to pronounce them with my American tongue. Anyhow, now that I know this alternate name, it increases my options for research. *sigh* Why do I make things harder on myself by writing about subjects for which I speak not the language? :P —[[User:Codehydro|<
::: The more I look at it, the more I think the "Network of Schools" section in [[Al-Jamiatul Ahlia Darul Ulum Moinul Islam]] is the Qawmi ed board and that the six-levels described in the Boro Madrasah article are the same six levels described in the [[Qawmi]] table. If that's the case, then the "beyond post graduate level" may actually not be a doctoral level but is rather the Tahfeezul Quran level. What do you think? —[[User:Codehydro|<
:::Bengali alphabet does not have any character for the Arabic character "wao", which sounds somewhere between "Wa" and "Va". So, in Bengali people use either ওয়া (Wa) or বা (Ba or Be) to transliterate this arabic sound. This explains why you've seen both "Wafaq ul" and "Befaqul" there. --[[User:Ragib|Ragib]] ([[User talk:Ragib|talk]]) 21:42, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
Line 70:
:and a good alt could be:
::<code><nowiki>... that '''[[Qawmi]]''' [[primary education]] lasts six years, though it does not differentiate students by progressive [[Educational stage|grade levels]]?</nowiki></code>
: —[[User:Codehydro|<
::Nevermind, I'll nominate it. Thanks for the encoragement though —[[User:Codehydro|<
Congrats on getting it DYK'd. The article is in great shape ... --[[User:Ragib|Ragib]] ([[User talk:Ragib|talk]]) 19:42, 1 September 2010 (UTC)
: Thanks :) It wouldn't have been created were it not for the seed of information you provided at the Boro Madrasah talk page. The first bit of information pointed me towards the first scholarly sources, which in turn provided bits that pointed to more sources, and so on. —[[User:Codehydro|<
== Al-Jamiatul Ahlia Darul Ulum Moinul Islam ==
Line 81:
Hi Codehydro! Any idea what's behind the IP editor (119... and 202...) who keeps on introducing the same unsourced "history" essay? The material that's being introduced could make good copy with a bit of editing, but the IP editor seems to be unwilling or unable to cite any sources. Since the history of the madrassah spans over 100 years he/she must surely be using some reference material. I'd like to assume good faith but the editors determination not to enter into discussion has left me baffled. -- [[User:Timberframe|Timberframe]] ([[User talk:Timberframe|talk]]) 17:52, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
* The IP is most likely associated with [[User talk:Bakrbinaziz]] whose account had been blocked for his stubborn editing. He seems to support the school as a former/current student if not work for the school, but that's my guess. I don't think the guy is necessarily bad, though apparently unable to understand Wikipedia policies. Moreover, I suspect his background and formal training seems to be faith-based (i.e. from single-source material like the Qu'ran or the school's homepage) rather than independent research based, thus he may lack the academic background for questioning primary sources and may lack the skill to look for information from outside sources. If my guess is correct, that could explain why he doesn't produce sources: he may simply not know how to search for them effectively. I could be wrong, but I am sympathetic with him despite my misgivings for his methods. Fortunately, he does seem to be using the article's [[Talk:Al-Jamiatul Ahlia Darul Ulum Moinul Islam|talk page]]. I've learned not really to bother posting on his user talk, because he hardly looks at it (plus his IP may change before he ever sees the you have new messages note). Anyhow, I agree that there could be a lot of good information from the history he posted, though it needs to be reworked from a NPoV and properly sourced. I plan to look at the copy he posted on the article talk to see if I can mine anything out of it in a few days. —[[User:Codehydro|<
The IPs are from [[Grameenphone]]'s wireless Internet, which Bakr uses. That's why his IP changes a lot from time to time. I have pending-changed the article to guard against such ip edits. But as CodeHydro says above, Bakr has started to use the article talk page (at least after being reverted several times). --[[User:Ragib|Ragib]] ([[User talk:Ragib|talk]]) 01:14, 25 August 2010 (UTC)
Line 89:
== [[Ribfest]] ==
You're right in that it isn't the "ribfest" itself that travels (they're all similar but not run by the same organization), but the ribbers. –[[user:xeno|<
:Thanks for your vote of confidence. Yeah, I usually avoid making unsourced statements, but now and then you run into details which perhaps are just so obvious that no sources bother to ever explain it. —[[User:Codehydro|<
== New ref tag options proposal ==
Line 112:
|}
Your opinions on the proposed system would be lovely :) —[[User:Codehydro|<
==DYK for Qawmi==
Line 126:
Ok, now you've crossed the line from clueless to disruptive. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia_talk%3AWikiProject_Transformers&action=historysubmit&diff=382070138&oldid=382069686 Canvassing for votes] like that is [[WP:CANVASS|completely unacceptable]]. [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 14:24, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
They were on the transformer's project page. I'm not canvassing... canvassing is going to random people. —[[User:Codehydro|<
:Read the policy page... What you're doing is unacceptable, and a failure to understand that is not going to let you get away with it. You can't approach a group, no matter who they are, and say "hey, go to ''x'' and vote ''y''. I notice you've also done it on user talk pages. Stop it, now. [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 14:27, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
*Then again, I could have made the word more neutral, let me do that —[[User:Codehydro|<
::*Sorry, I admit it was poorly thought out. I simply intended to point out that "decide by centralized discussion" could be an option, but was sloppy in implementing it. It's a new idea, so give me a break. —[[User:Codehydro|<
What does "merge as per centralised discussion" even mean? People can already propose a merge (or just go ahead and do it) without the need for a "centralised discussion". In any case, merging only makes any sense when there is a target, which you haven't actually proposed... [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 14:34, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
*Because there are just so many articles, the complexity may make it unrealistic for the destination to be decided before the first AfD. —[[User:Codehydro|<
**They don't all have to be merged to the same place... Again, it makes little sense to look at these together. The discussions are working fine independently. One of the strengths of AfD is that it has some closure- stuff actually gets dealt with. Your ideas concerning these nominations seem to be to leave them for even longer before anything actually happens. [[User:J Milburn|J Milburn]] ([[User talk:J Milburn|talk]]) 15:53, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
Line 149:
==Transformers==
From what I can see. Those voters love picking on those Transformers related articles. I would love to help but there seems to be a work together cliche of delete, delete, delete. I did mention I'd rather them be merged instead of deleted but you know... [[User:Jhenderson777|<span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px:color:blue">Jhenderson</span>]]<sup>'''[[User talk:Jhenderson777| <span style="color:red;">7</span><span style="color:blue;">7</span><span style="color:aqua;">7</span>]]'''</sup> 17:35, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
:My main point of contention is that it's all happening too fast. DGG suggested that somebody could ask for a close of non-consensus for all the articles with a promise to renominate simply because it's unfair to attack them all at the same time... I would suggest that myself but I can't make that promise as I will be unavailable to do so... nonetheless, the transformers fiasco has inspired a new policy proposal idea at the village pump: [[WP:AFDPP]]. What do you think? —[[User:Codehydro|<
::Looks good. I hope it works. I am not the one who is always against AFD's. But I think I am getting tired of hearing that's not perfectly sourced or it doesn't have sources to prove that it's notable so it must not be. It makes Wikipedia feel less like an encyclopedia of freedom. I think it's better to have a chance to expand Wikipedia then to keep AFDing every article that's not perfect for Wikipedia guidelines. It's just beginning articles. Tag it as Start Class or tag to improve the article or something. I wish somebody was good at finding sources in here because I most certainly am not. That is always the most hardest thing in Wikipedia. That's why [[Wikia]] is better in fictional information. They don't force things on you. You have your own freedom as long as it's constructive to it's topic. [[User:Jhenderson777|<span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px:color:blue">Jhenderson</span>]]<sup>'''[[User talk:Jhenderson777| <span style="color:red;">7</span><span style="color:blue;">7</span><span style="color:aqua;">7</span>]]'''</sup> 19:20, 2 September 2010 (UTC)
Line 169:
Is this usual?
--[[User:JHvW|<
Discussion is possible, but you have to click the link in the deletion tag that says "Please share your thoughts on the matter at '''[[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eiffel Tower in popular culture (2nd nomination)|this article's entry]]''' on the...". Click on the link in the quest I just made. The rescue tag only links to the first discussion as it's not designed for multiple deletions. —[[User:Codehydro|<
:Thank you again. Sometimes I have difficulty understanding these discussions and the proper way to go about them. The discussion on this subject was closed so quickly I had only just realised that discussion was possible (I believe the whole disussion was over in a week). It also seems that this article comes up for deletion regularly. It is not linked to the main article it is a part of. Is linking and rewriting a way to prevent this cycle of deletion requests? The fact that there are two tags on the top of the page may suggest that somebody is using some sort of search tool to look for these tags and nominate that article for deletion. --[[User:JHvW|<
== Comments ==
Line 179:
My intitial take is "[[Wikipedia:Wikilawyering|wikilawyering]]" by the other. I can't tell what's going on or what's his [[WP:POV]]. [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 20:02, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
So what's up? [[User:Bearian|Bearian]] ([[User talk:Bearian|talk]]) 17:25, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
:Sorry for the delayed response. I've replied on your talk. —[[User:Codehydro|<
==Rescue==
Line 197:
|style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 3px solid gray;" | You deserve this for your tireless efforts with the [[Mark Burgess (illustrator)]] article while in AfD (and whatever the outcome!) Sincerely, [[User:Marcus civis|Marcus civis]] ([[User talk:Marcus civis|talk]]) 15:22, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
|}
:*Thank you for the barnstar! I sincerely appreciate it :) And looks like the article was closed as keep :D —[[User:Codehydro|<
==Thanks==
Line 225:
Thank you for your excellent contributions to the [[Bauhaus Project (computing)]] article. Due to your efforts, I predict that the article will be kept. — Regards, [[User:HowardBGolden|HowardBGolden]] ([[User talk:HowardBGolden|talk]]) 20:04, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
:*Just doing what I can to help. Though, please, control that temper of yours in the AfD. The article is not out of the woods yet. —[[User:Codehydro|<
::*Thanks for the advice. I'll try harder to heed it! — [[User:HowardBGolden|HowardBGolden]] ([[User talk:HowardBGolden|talk]]) 21:22, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
Line 253:
Hi! The redirect from [[Template:Infobox festival]] to [[Template:Infobox recurring event]] caused a number of transclusions to break – see e.g. the markup <nowiki>"[[File:" and "|150px]]"</nowiki> in [[Stratford Shakespeare Festival]]. Undoing the merge is probably not a good idea because this would break the transclusions that have been fixed in the meantime. Just to notify you to be careful with such things. I'll file a [[Wikipedia:Bot requests|request]] for a bot to fix this. Cheers, [[User:Anypodetos|ἀνυπόδητος]] ([[User talk:Anypodetos|talk]]) 08:49, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
:Oops, I thought I checked for such things; I actually tried to code the template so that it could accept parameters from both infobox festival and infobox recurring event without conflict, but I guess I missed one. Such mergers of independently developed templates can get quite complicated... What's trickier is that these bugs don't appear immediately since the MediaWiki software doesn't convert wiki-markup to html for an article until a new edit is made on the article itself. Thus, bugs in a template don't reveal themselves on the article even if you refresh the page since edits made on the template do not trigger MediaWiki to update the generated html file that's stored for each article that uses the template. In effect, the bug you saw in the Stratford Shakespeare Festival article was invisible until somebody else edited the page after the merger. Thanks for catching that one! —[[User:Codehydro|<
::No problem. I've had my problems with this MediaWiki "feature" as well... [[User:Anypodetos|ἀνυπόδητος]] ([[User talk:Anypodetos|talk]]) 12:45, 27 September 2010 (UTC)
Line 283:
[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|30px]][[Template:Pruned]] has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at [[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion#Template:Pruned|the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page]]. Thank you.<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> —[[User:Koavf|Justin (koavf)]]❤[[User talk:Koavf|T]]☮[[Special:Contributions/Koavf|C]]☺[[Special:Emailuser/Koavf|M]]☯ 01:35, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
: I just closed this discussion, and am taking you up on your offer to reformat the template. Thanks! [[User:Plastikspork|Plastikspork]] [[User talk:Plastikspork|<sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ</sub><sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk)</sup>]] 01:03, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
::I'll get to it shortly :) Just give me a bit to figure out how best to accomplish the task. —[[User:Codehydro|<
:::Okay, done. I have even added [[Template:Pruned#Appearance_in_article_space|a special message]] that only displays in article space, meaning on all current articles with {{tl|pruned}} on it. I guess this means it's both an edit notice and a maintenance template for itself ^_^ —[[User:Codehydro|<
== minor avatar characters ==
Line 291:
:Also the article [[Appa and Momo]] is being nominated for deleted [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Appa and Momo|here]]. Since you have edited on ''[[Avatar:The Last Airbender]]'' type articles on the past. I just figured you might want to weigh in. − [[User:Jhenderson777|<span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px:color:blue">Jhenderson</span>]]<sup>'''[[User talk:Jhenderson777| <span style="color:red;">7</span><span style="color:blue;">7</span><span style="color:aqua;">7</span>]]'''</sup> 16:43, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
*I've commented on both discussions. I've already done a bit of research on Appa and Momo which has demonstrated clear notability on the Appa side and nearly sufficient notability for Momo. I don't have the time to rework the article yet, but I am fairly confident that I can get at least Appa to keepable shape before the AfD closes. Just in case I am unable to find the time to do so myself, feel free to begin expanding on the points that I addressed in the AfD without me. —[[User:Codehydro|<
**I would love to but I probably won't today because I am not feeling my best today. Be sure to find and include some good reception of the characters, that is key. Google is more your friend than mine. ;) − [[User:Jhenderson777|<span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px:color:blue">Jhenderson</span>]]<sup>'''[[User talk:Jhenderson777| <span style="color:red;">7</span><span style="color:blue;">7</span><span style="color:aqua;">7</span>]]'''</sup> 00:33, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
:::You're doing a pretty good job with Appa, Out of curiosity are you going to try with Momo as well? [[User:Jhenderson777|<span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px:color:blue">Jhenderson</span>]]<sup>'''[[User talk:Jhenderson777| <span style="color:red;">7</span><span style="color:blue;">7</span><span style="color:aqua;">7</span>]]'''</sup> 15:46, 13 January 2011 (UTC)
::::Thanks, I may attempt Momo some time in the future, but I'll be too busy for a while so Momo will have to just be merged for now unless somebody else is willing to pour a few hours into research. I think I'm going to end my work on [[Appa]] now since I think it's good enough to stand as is. I haven't at all looked at the "In the animated series" section much, but, since you've actually seen the show, would you mind doing that part for me? I can't invest the time to watch the whole series, so it would be difficult for me to write on that section. On a side note, "Appa" does not seem to be Japanese for Apple, though Momo is peach. —[[User:Codehydro|<
:::::How about this, you find me sources for Momo and then link them to me and I will see with what I can do with the article if you are too busy to fix the Momo article.;) [[User:Jhenderson777|<span style="border:1px solid blue;padding:1px:color:blue">Jhenderson</span>]]<sup>'''[[User talk:Jhenderson777| <span style="color:red;">7</span><span style="color:blue;">7</span><span style="color:aqua;">7</span>]]'''</sup> 19:42, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
== [[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion|Nomination for deletion]] of [[Template:AfD-postpone]] ==
Line 305:
You still planning to do anything with [[Wikipedia:Postpone: An Alternative in AfDs|this]] proposal, or is it dead? <span style="color:green">'''Ten Pound Hammer'''</span> • <sup>([[User talk:TenPoundHammer|What did I screw up now?]])</sup> 20:25, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
*Not in the intermediate term due to lack of time of late, but I still think it is something which should be developed further. It's one of those things that need a big chunk of free time to develop, you know? —[[User:Codehydro|<
**Anyhow, the basic idea is there. All it needs is for the guidelines to be written. The template and concept are pretty much ready to go already. Do you have any suggestions as to when postponement of an AfD should be preferred over a quick decision? —[[User:Codehydro|<
***No, and I can't imagine the alternative being useful. <span style="color:green">'''Ten Pound Hammer'''</span> • <sup>([[User talk:TenPoundHammer|What did I screw up now?]])</sup> 21:07, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
Line 330:
{| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | [[File:Choco-Nut Bake with Meringue Top cropped.jpg|120px]]
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | For [[Android version history]]. The new look is very simplified and clean. Well done on that! '''[[User:Jenova20|ツ <span style="color:red;font-family:comic sans ms">Je<
|}
== May 2013 ==
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Hello, I'm [[User:BracketBot|BracketBot]]. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=557040909 your edit] to [[Gold bar]] may have broken the [[syntax]] by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just [{{fullurl:Gold bar|action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+typo+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3ABracketBot%7CBracketBot%5D%5D}} edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20{{subst</noinclude>:REVISIONUSER}}§ion=new my operator's talk page].
! style="background-color: #FAA;" {{!}} <div style="font-size:112%;">List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page<span style="font-size:88%;margin-left:3em;">(Click show <span style="font-size:130%;">⇨</span>)</span></div>
{{!}}-
Line 344:
[[File:Information.svg|25px|alt=|link=]] Hello, I'm [[User:BracketBot|BracketBot]]. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=557569753 your edit] to [[Gross world product]] may have broken the [[syntax]] by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just [{{fullurl:Gross world product|action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+typo+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3ABracketBot%7CBracketBot%5D%5D}} edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20{{subst</noinclude>:REVISIONUSER}}§ion=new my operator's talk page].
! style="background-color: #FAA;" {{!}} <div style="font-size:112%;">List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page<span style="font-size:88%;margin-left:3em;">(Click show <span style="font-size:130%;">⇨</span>)</span></div>
{{!}}-
Line 355:
Just thought I'd give you a heads-up, the Freerice graph showing the number of people fed over time is 8 months out of date. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/91.85.54.139|91.85.54.139]] ([[User talk:91.85.54.139|talk]]) 11:16, 20 December 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
* Updated. I had been holding off because the Freerice website totals appeared glitched since Sept 2013. Was going to wait until they fixed it, but looks like they did not... oh well, held off long enough —[[User:Codehydro|<
==CSS Image Crop==
Line 363:
Please stop. Your test is introducing nonsense code which break pages that use the position parameter. Pleas use the sandbox version instead, and use a copy of a working article to test the sandbox version. But do '''not''' test using the live template. <code style="white-space:nowrap">-- [[[[User:Edokter|<span style="color:#006">User:Edokter</span>]]]] {{[[User talk:Edokter|<span style="color:#060">talk</span>]]}}</code> 17:20, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
* {{reply to|Edokter}} Do not worry, the code is intentionally nonsensical and any normal browser should ignore it. I positioned the code in such a way as to not affect how pages are displayed at all. The effect would only be visible in the source code of a live page, which is invisible to most folks. CSS hacks require code to be delivered in a certain ___location for it to work. Think of it as a [[barium enema]]--invisible to the naked eye, but tells a lot to a doctor who is looking at xrays for where the barium stops in the wiki image digestive tract. —[[User:Codehydro|<
:* {{reply to|Mitchumch}} Yay, I think I finally figured it out... ~the problem was really subtle and was hard to solve without having read through Wikipedia's CSS sheet for mobiles, which is really quite long... Three different CSS properties had to be patched to get it to work. —[[User:Codehydro|<
:::I believe you're a Wikigenius. Thank you. I've been trying to find someone to fix this for nearly two months. [[User:Mitchumch|Mitchumch]] ([[User talk:Mitchumch|talk]]) 23:15, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
::::* {{reply to|Mitchumch}} You are welcome! And thanks for the kind words. Good job spotting the problem and finding me :P It had been just about 4 years since I last worked on that template and Wiki mobile wasn't even a thing back then. —[[User:Codehydro|<
::::: I believe the code that you changed to make this template work when displayed on a mobile device has been broken. Is it possible for you to take a look at it? Thank you. [[User:Mitchumch|Mitchumch]] ([[User talk:Mitchumch|talk]]) 15:42, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
::::::* {{reply to|Mitchumch}} I think somebody else has fixed it. If not, can you describe what is wrong? —[[User:Codehydro|<
::::::: Please look at [https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_mayors_of_Columbus,_Ohio List of mayors of Columbus, Ohio] in mobile view. The images are off centered and sized incorrectly. Thanks. [[User:Mitchumch|Mitchumch]] ([[User talk:Mitchumch|talk]]) 18:10, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
:::::::* {{reply to|Mitchumch}} Fixed. Somebody tried to simplify the template and removed redundancies that were intentionally put there to let the template work under different situations. —[[User:Codehydro|<
:::::::: That new script is beyond awesome. You definitely need to pat yourself on the back for this. [[User:Mitchumch|Mitchumch]] ([[User talk:Mitchumch|talk]]) 18:17, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
Line 384:
Hi there, I see you're a much more prolific contributor than I but I happen to be viewing the wiki on [[gold]] when I noticed a historical price chart that, at first glance, appeared to be very different from what my memory of gold prices told me. After viewing I noticed the scale was exponential rather than linear which struck me as unusual and perhaps less helpful to the average viewer, and also could present gold as a much more stable investment compared to actual values given the smoothness of the scale. For reference, the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gold#mediaviewer/File:Gold-nominal-constant-usd.svg chart on the gold wiki] and a typical [http://www.macrotrends.net/1333/gold-and-silver-prices-100-year-historical-chart 100 year chart] (both inflation adjusted)
I'm not trying to claim you have done anything improper, but I am curious as to why the scale is exponential rather than linear since price scales are typically linear, could you fill me in on what i'm missing here? thanks for your time. <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Tunafizzle|Tunafizzle]] ([[User talk:Tunafizzle|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Tunafizzle|contribs]]) 01:09, 27 September 2014 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
:* {{replyto|User:Tunafizzle}} Glad you asked! To answer, notice how [http://www.macrotrends.net/1333/gold-and-silver-prices-100-year-historical-chart your example] plots only adjusted prices whereas my chart also plots nominal (non-adjusted) prices in addition to the above. Though fine for plotting inflation-adjusted prices, a linear scale would be inappropriate for plotting nominal prices over any duration long enough for significant inflation. For example, given the thumbnail size of the chart as shown on [[Gold#Investment]], it would take a change of ~$18 to shift the line by a single pixel on a linear scale. Thus, even though the increase of $14.33 meant a dramatic 68 percent change in 1934, a linear scale may show no increase at all. Secondly, though you are right that a linear scale can be easier to comprehend, a logarithmic scale is more useful for comparing relative change. For example, a hypothetical $50 price drop looks deceptively the same whether you started with $100 or $1000, even though the loss suffered by an investor would be 10 times bigger in the former (50% vs. 5%); in contrast, on a log scale, an investment gain of 10% looks just a sharp whether the initial price were $1 or $10000. Of course, an alternative could be to plot adjusted prices on a linear scale and nominal ones on a separate scale, however, I think having two scales could cause even greater confusion than what you experienced. Does this answer your question? —[[User:Codehydro|<
==DYK for Second wind (sleep)==
Line 391:
|image = [[Image:Updated DYK query.svg|15px|Updated DYK query]]
|text = On [[Wikipedia:Recent_additions#23 October 2014|23 October 2014]], '''[[:Template:Did you know|Did you know]]''' was updated with a fact from the article '''''[[Second wind (sleep)]]''''', which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ''... that a '''[[Second wind (sleep)|second wind]]''' makes sleep-deprived persons feel less sleepy on the fifth sleepless day than they did on the fourth?'' {{#if: |The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[]].|{{#ifexist:Template:Did you know nominations/Second wind (sleep)|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[Template:Did you know nominations/Second wind (sleep)]].|{{#ifexist:Template talk:Did you know/Second wind (sleep)|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at [[Template talk:Did you know/Second wind (sleep)]].}} }} }} You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page <small>([[User:Rjanag/Pageview stats|here's how]], [https://tools.wmflabs.org/wikiviewstats/index.php?page=Second_wind_(sleep)&datefrom=2014-10-01&dateto=2014-10-31 live views], [http://stats.grok.se/en/201410/Second_wind_(sleep) daily totals])</small>, and it may be added to [[Wikipedia:Did you know/Statistics|the statistics page]] if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the [[:Template talk:Did you know|Did you know talk page]].
}}<!-- Template:UpdatedDYKNom --> —[[User:HJ Mitchell|<
{{Talkback|zowie}}
Line 407:
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> [[User:StringTheory11|StringTheory11]] ([[User talk:StringTheory11|t]] • [[Special:Contributions/StringTheory11|c]]) 19:17, 17 December 2014 (UTC)
:FYI, I've now userfied it for you at [[User:Codehydro/List of celestial bodies by galactic coordinate system]]. [[User:StringTheory11|StringTheory11]] ([[User talk:StringTheory11|t]] • [[Special:Contributions/StringTheory11|c]]) 03:09, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
::{{Ping|StringTheory11}} Thanks for remembering! And merry Christmas —[[User:Codehydro|<
<div style="background-color: #BBDDFF; border:1px solid #4169E1; padding:6px 4px"><!--
--> [[File:Nuvola apps edu languages.svg|left|18px]] Hello, Codehydro. You have '''new messages''' at [[User talk:Nikthestunned|Nikthestunned's talk page]]. <small>--19:22, 18 December 2014 (UTC)</small></div>
== Lua ==
Line 423:
:Also, [[Special:MostTranscludedPages]] may be worth a look, although you might have to scroll a few pages to find suitable templates that haven't been converted already. — '''''[[User:Mr. Stradivarius|<span style="color: #194D00; font-family: Palatino, Times, serif">Mr. Stradivarius</span>]]''''' <sup>[[User talk:Mr. Stradivarius|♪ talk ♪]]</sup>
:* {{reply-to|Mr. Stradivarius}} Done with {{t|If empty/sandbox}}. See <s>the talk page of the sandbox of my</s> test case... probably not the most efficient code, but what can you expect from someone who didn't know any Lua about an hour ago? —[[User:Codehydro|<
::* {{reply-to|Mr. Stradivarius}} My test cases on the talk were moved to [[Template:If empty/testcases]]. The code was also simplified by [[User:Jackmcbarn]], though I did find a small bug that he didn't notice. (And I apparently never noticed the "Preview page with this template" / "Preview page with this module" box at the bottom before... is that relatively new? I shall no longer do template/module test edits now that I know that's available XD) —[[User:Codehydro|<
::*:What bug would that be? [[User:Jackmcbarn|Jackmcbarn]] ([[User talk:Jackmcbarn|talk]]) 21:16, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
:::* {{reply-to|Jackmcbarn}} It wasn't working with the <nowiki>{{If empty|2=x}}</nowiki> example. Output was a blank string. See [[Template:If empty/testcases]]. —[[User:Codehydro|<
:::: Congrats, your code is now up live on [https://tools.wmflabs.org/templatecount/index.php?lang=en&name=If_empty&namespace=10#bottom 600,000 pages]. :) Also, the "preview page with this module" box is [[mw:Extension:TemplateSandbox]], which was indeed introduced fairly recently (in MediaWiki 1.20). You should also check out [[User:Jackmcbarn/advancedtemplatesandbox.js]], which makes it even more powerful. There's a special page as well - [[Special:TemplateSandbox]]. — '''''[[User:Mr. Stradivarius|<span style="color: #194D00; font-family: Palatino, Times, serif">Mr. Stradivarius</span>]]''''' <sup>[[User talk:Mr. Stradivarius|♪ talk ♪]]</sup> 23:32, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
::::: {{reply-to|Mr. Stradivarius}} Thanks! And I just finished up with [[Module:Asbox]]. The visible output seem good to go, though the category tagging is somewhat harder to test in the sandbox because of the namespace switches, though I'm pretty confident it should work the same. —[[User:Codehydro|<
::::::I added some comments to [[Module:Asbox]] about things you should change. [[User:Jackmcbarn|Jackmcbarn]] ([[User talk:Jackmcbarn|talk]]) 05:46, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
:::::::It looks like we were thinking alike. :) I added a code review to [[Module talk:Asbox]] before I noticed that you'd done a review as well. — '''''[[User:Mr. Stradivarius|<span style="color: #194D00; font-family: Palatino, Times, serif">Mr. Stradivarius</span>]]''''' <sup>[[User talk:Mr. Stradivarius|♪ talk ♪]]</sup> 07:06, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
==Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)/Archive 133#Custom notices on user .js and .css pages==
[[File:Farm-Fresh eye.png|15px|link=|alt=]] You are invited to join the discussion at [[Wikipedia:Village pump (technical)/Archive 133#Custom notices on user .js and .css pages]]. Thanks. — <span class="nowrap">{{U|[[User:Technical 13|Technical 13]]}} <sup>([[Special:EmailUser/Technical 13|e]] • [[User talk:Technical 13|t]] • [[Special:Contribs/Technical 13|c]])</sup></span> 14:58, 6 January 2015 (UTC)
== A bit of praise and a request. ==
Line 446:
But yeah, I'd be extremely grateful if you could assist me with this! - [[User:J man708|J man708]] ([[User talk:J man708|talk]]) 17:50, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
* {{ping|J man708}} I came up with a solution that allows you to use seeds with Module:RoundN without impacting performance to non-seed users: {{t|RDseed}}. You'd have to specify the matches to hide using the {{para|skipmatch}} parameter of RoundN, but that shouldn't be overly difficult. See the doc page for RDseed and [[Module talk:RoundN/testcases/4]]. —[[User:Codehydro|<
:* Worked awesomely, man. The only problem I came across was caused by me and not the module itself. Hahaha. Typical human error. Anyway, just curious, as to how many rounds this bracket can actually successfully run. I got it to work with 64 teams, I believe the tennis one is 128 from memory? (I'm not a huge tennis buff, but I think most majors are 128?) Provided they'd fit and it wouldn't look stupid, can it run 256, 512 or even 1024? How high can it go? :P</br>- [[User:J man708|J man708]] ([[User talk:J man708|talk]]) 07:28, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
::*{{ping|J man708}}Given unlimited memory, the limit is the biggest integer that is power of 2 available in the Lua language, which I believe is 2^46 or about 70 trillion. But because Wikipedia limits us to 50MB of memory per page, probably about 1024 (or 2048 if you skip a lot of matches). In any case, the real limit is in how much advertising money the sport can make as the cost of hosting an sporting event involving a number of teams anywhere near the memory limit is probably beyond the reach of even Bill Gates.... By the way, I simplified the match skipping on your template to use a feature which is not currently documented (it's one of the things I wanted to announce when the module goes Beta, so you're getting a special preview ;)). Also, I hope I didn't create a edit conflict as I didn't notice you may still be working on that article. —[[User:Codehydro|<
:::*Hahaha! Awesome! I can't think of any direct knockout tournaments requiring that many anyway. The highest I can think of are the Grand Slams... But yeah, no edit conflicts or issues (except for that ping not actually notifying me) :P - [[User:J man708|J man708]] ([[User talk:J man708|talk]]) 17:35, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
Line 474:
Please be more careful with editing major modules like [[Module:Asbox]], especially without double-checkiong your work immediately. Your reent edit actually prevented all stubs from being categorized. It was simple enpugh to check - all you needed to do was null-edit a single stub article, and make sure it stayed in stub categories - which this time it wouldn't have. [[User:Od Mishehu|עוד מישהו]] [[User talk:Od Mishehu|Od Mishehu]] 09:07, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
* {{ping|Od Mishehu}} Oh dear... while it's no excuse, I believe the Template:Asbox/testcases mislead me into thinking that the categories would work in article space. I had reviewed all testcases, userspace, and several actual stub templates. Thought I checked article space, but I guess I must have misremembered my check on the 'article emulation' testcase as having done on it on actual articles. (The article emulation check showed categories because template space behavior was unaffected). Unfortunately, there's no way to make a 'testcase' in article space... this template is so complicated... I'm going to change the edit notice to include a list of things to check as a reminder... —[[User:Codehydro|<
::There is a very simple test you could have done: null edit an article, and if there are problems, either try to fix, or revert immediately. [[User:Od Mishehu|עוד מישהו]] [[User talk:Od Mishehu|Od Mishehu]] 16:56, 8 February 2015 (UTC)
Line 480:
Hey Codehydro, I've come across an issue with the Round N template [[1995–96 NSL Cup]]. Adelaide City and Canberra Cosmos played their Round of 16 fixtures and were given a bye past the Quarter Final stage straight into the Semi Finals. Is there anyway that a line can be drawn to represent the journeys of both teams from the Round of 16 to the Semi Finals? Cheers. - [[User:J man708|J man708]] ([[User talk:J man708|talk]]) 03:40, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
:{{ping|J man708}} I modified [[1995–96 NSL Cup]] to use an unreleased Beta feature. Is that what you want? (PS: If you want more details, you'll have to wait until we officially go into Beta and the doc page is updated with the new Beta features.) —[[User:Codehydro|<
::Perfect! Thanks a bunch! You'd have thought that the organisers would've just called those two matches Quarter Finals, huh? :P - [[User:J man708|J man708]] ([[User talk:J man708|talk]]) 15:19, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
:::{{ping|J man708}} Well, not quite perfect. I have plans for adding another node_function{} that would make the line straight rather than bend outwards, but RoundN's development is on hold for now as I'm on a higher-priority project. Anyhow, I thought the same thing about making them Quarter Finals. Also, technically the Round of 16 is a round of 12... is it really officially called a Round of 16? —[[User:Codehydro|<
::::Nah, that one appears to have been a "First Round". Already fixed that up. I guess it makes sense. I must've just copied it over from a previous page and used it as a template. Oh well. I like how the line is at the moment, but I'm sure others will have differing opinions. Hahaha. Once again, thanks a bunch! - [[User:J man708|J man708]] ([[User talk:J man708|talk]]) 15:35, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
{{ping|J man708}} I just noticed that the template was manually bolded and that the scores were manually summed. Cleaned it up for you. The only difference is that intermediate games are not bolded and have a thinner border between them. Do you mind these changes, or would you like me to add an option to auto-bold all intermediate rounds even when the +sum switch is used? —[[User:Codehydro|<
:I did that thinking that most brackets showed the winner's scores bolded in each individual leg, which apparently isn't the case. I think that the current set up is fine. I just must've had a senior moment or some shit. It's good to know an idiot like myself could figure the new template system out and work out a way to make that work. But yeah, I don't mind the changes at all, Hydro. Whatever you think would be better off? You make coding sound easy. :P - [[User:J man708|J man708]] ([[User talk:J man708|talk]]) 15:50, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
::Don't beat yourself up. It's on me for not updating the doc page, which does not talk about node functions nor anything about the +sum switch. Also, your confusion probably came from how individual legs are bolded when the final score box is not a sum of the previous boxes, such as in [[Module talk:RoundN/testcases/5]]. In tennis, it is the total number of sets won that determine who wins, not the sum of the scores. Or let's put it this way: let's say a round of tennis has 3 sets, and player A scored 99, 0, 0 for each set and player B scored 0, 1, 1; team B wins even though team A has a much higher sum. In your case, it really doesn't who won each leg since it's all about the sum of the score. In short, the bold intermediate legs only when winning that leg matters more than how many points were scored in that leg. —[[User:Codehydro|<
:::Still though, you would've thought I'd have figured that shit out by now? :P Cheers Hydro! - [[User:J man708|J man708]] ([[User talk:J man708|talk]]) 17:34, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
Line 497:
|style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | I hereby award you the technical barnstar, for your services to the wiki in converting templates to Lua modules and then spending hours searching for little fiddly bugs in them. Thank you! — '''''[[User:Mr. Stradivarius|<span style="color: #194D00; font-family: Palatino, Times, serif">Mr. Stradivarius</span>]]''''' <sup>[[User talk:Mr. Stradivarius|♪ talk ♪]]</sup> 02:31, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
|}
* Thanks Strad! In an ideal world, those bugs shouldn't have existed in the first place, but considering that Asbox was only my second module... heh, I bet you didn't realize how complicated this would be when you suggested it as a good beginner's project? :P —[[User:Codehydro|<
== AGF ==
Hi Codehydro, it is great to see you AGF on a couple of AfDs [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Forex Heatmap]] and in principle good to focus on the sources not editors. You may be interested in [[User talk:Karlhard#Furvah]], so we know they are an undisclosed paid editor. There's a new AfD. <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">[[User:Widefox|Widefox]]</span>; [[User talk:Widefox|talk]]</span> 22:49, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
* Thank you for contacting me. I have commented at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Forex Heatmap (2nd nomination)]] —[[User:Codehydro|<
**{{ping|Widefox}} —[[User:Codehydro|<
== A barnstar for you! ==
Line 518:
Hi! I'm trying to adapt [[Module:Asbox]] to [[:lv:Modulis:Asbox|Latvian Wikipedia]]. I'm not so good at Lua, so I have some minor problems. So my question is - is it possible to set new parameter ({{code|args.biography}}), so if it is set (that is, in stub template there is {{para|biography|yes}}), there is another string instead of this one:
<
' is stub.',</
The desired result would be something like this:
<
if (args.biography == yes) then
Buffer'This one':_(args.subject):_(args.article or 'biography'):_(args.qualifier)' ',--space
Line 528:
else
--here goes the original string
</syntaxhighlight>
You can make any edits [[:lv:Modulis:Asbox|here]]. The code starts with ''{{tq|Buffer'Šis ar':_(args.subject):_(args.article}}'' there --'''[[User:Edgars2007|<span style="color:#FF6600;">Edgars2007</span>]]''' <small>([[User talk:Edgars2007|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Edgars2007|contribs]])</small> 09:54, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
* {{ ping | edgars2007 }} You don't need to add a new parameter. All you need to do use set the subject parameter to biography and use the qualifier parameter for more detail, like so:
Line 541:
|category = biography
|qualifier = on [[User:Codehydro]] is very short and}}
Do you understand? —[[User:Codehydro|<
*{{ping|Edgars2007}} just pinging again because i may have messed up the ping —[[User:Codehydro|<
:* PS: If Latvian grammar is different, just remember that you can put almost anything as subject or qualifier. Subject goes before "article" and qualifier goes after, i.e. if you want, you can flip them and put what normally is a subject in the qualifier param and the qualifier in the subject param. For example:
{{Asbox|demo=yes|subject = short|qualifier = of a biographical nature}} —[[User:Codehydro|<
::Yes, I understand, but that won't work for Latvian. For biographies we have quite different text. Including ''This'' and ''stub'' part. That's why we need some more parameters (in this case - one more), than you have. --'''[[User:Edgars2007|<span style="color:#FF6600;">Edgars2007</span>]]''' <small>([[User talk:Edgars2007|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Edgars2007|contribs]])</small> 17:18, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
:::{{ping|User:Edgars2007}} where is the template for biographies? I don't see a template asbox in the latvian wiki... show me example of both. Until I see exactly how they look different, I can't help. In other words, give a me a sample code with all sample parameters and then give me a full final string that you want rendered, that is:
Line 554:
|param4=D
}}</pre>
should produce: "This A B is a C stub D"--replacing paramX and letters with what you think should be used. —[[User:Codehydro|<
*
::So,
Line 568:
::should produce: "Šī ar Latviju saistītā cilvēka biogrāfija ir nepilnīga". --'''[[User:Edgars2007|<span style="color:#FF6600;">Edgars2007</span>]]''' <small>([[User talk:Edgars2007|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Edgars2007|contribs]])</small> 15:43, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
* {{ping|Edgars2007}}I don't speak the language, but I'm guessing the problem lies in the plural versus singular form.... why not rewrite the line to "Šis latviešu biogrāfiskais raksts ir nepilnīgs" or something like that?
You don't see English wiki using "These Lativian biographies are stubs"... each stub tag should be to each article by itself... if Latvian wiki has an existing stub template that does not follow this standard, then perhaps you shouldn't encourage it but instead put some kind of note on the bad template and said that it is being depreciated and that others should rewrite the stub notices to match the new form? —[[User:Codehydro|<
:Latvian and English language are quite different. It isn't so easy, your suggested form (or anything else, which uses the same words as in the standart (''Šis'', ''aizmetnis'')) won't work. You can just tell me, how to include {{code|if (args.biography {{=}}{{=}} yes)}} (or something similar) part in the code, I would be able to do everything else myself, I guess. --'''[[User:Edgars2007|<span style="color:#FF6600;">Edgars2007</span>]]''' <small>([[User talk:Edgars2007|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Edgars2007|contribs]])</small> 16:44, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
::{{ping|edgars2007}} Look at second example in [[:lv:Moduļa diskusija:Asbox/Testi]]--is that what you are looking for? I edited the code as you requested, though I would suggest a different parameter name other than biography to make it more generic... for example, plural or singular = yes. All you are changing are justa few endings which I imagine should apply to things other than biographies. —[[User:Codehydro|<
:::Forgot to say THANKS! No, ''biography = yes'' is just fine, because it's not singular/plural thing, it's really only for biographies.
:::BTW, why this isn't working?
<
:_in'Š%s':_(args.subject):_(args.article or '%s'):_(args.qualifier):_out' '
:_' ir [[Vikipēdija:Aizmetnis|nepilnīg%s]]. Jūs varat [[Palīdzība:Rediģēšana, noformēšana|dot savu ieguldījumu]] Vikipēdijā, ['
:format(unpack(yesno(args.biography) and {'ī', 'biogrāfija', 'a'} or {'is ar', 'saistītais raksts', 's'})),</
:::I just added one more string checking. It isn't returning good results. --'''[[User:Edgars2007|<span style="color:#FF6600;">Edgars2007</span>]]''' <small>([[User talk:Edgars2007|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Edgars2007|contribs]])</small> 07:29, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
:::: {{ping|Edgars2007}} You're welcome. And it doesn't work because <code>args.article or '%s'</code> is conditional. In other words, the <b>or '%s'</b> part is only read if the |article= parameter is not used. You samples all use the article parameter. Edit the test cases to not use the article param and you may have better luck. —[[User:Codehydro|<
:::::I knew I was doing something silly :) Thanks. Was able to convert all but one stub template, which had too different wording, but it's fine :) --'''[[User:Edgars2007|<span style="color:#FF6600;">Edgars2007</span>]]''' <small>([[User talk:Edgars2007|talk]]/[[Special:Contributions/Edgars2007|contribs]])</small> 22:46, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
Line 631:
: Hi Codehydro, Now I'm "Titan" on the new wiki, [https://stt.wiki https://stt.wiki] (since February 2017). If you want to drop by, we have someone questioning one of the templates you made, and how it works. Also, with the new site, we made it so there were much more relaxed limits on expensive parser functions (100->250) and expansion depth (40->60) per page. Please let me know what you think on my talk page: [https://stt.wiki/wiki/User_talk:Titan https://stt.wiki/wiki/User_talk:Titan]. Thanks, [[User:Admiral Titan|Admiral Titan]] ([[User talk:Admiral Titan|talk]]) 21:20, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
::{{ping|Admiral Titan}} Your wiki's abuse filter blocked my username and my ip from editing all pages because I attempted to post an external link on a talk page. You should adjust your abuse filter policies because I can't even contact you on your talk page on stt.wiki. You should adjust the policy to allow external links on talks and to allow blocked users to post on talk pages. Also, I suggest you give User:CodeHydro on your wiki some user rights because templates such as ItemX are edit-protected, which would prevent me from maintaining them. —[[User:Codehydro|<
== JavaScript RegExp problem ==
Line 641:
Thank you. [[User talk:The Transhumanist|<i>The Transhumanist</i>]] 12:11, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
`
:{{ping|Transhumanist}} Is your goal simply to make red links appear like normal links visually whenever you load a page which title contains the word Outline? —[[User:Codehydro|<
== ArbCom 2017 election voter message ==
Line 657:
Hey Codehydro, would it be a good idea to include seeds in the [[Module:RoundN]] model. For example, like in the table below. In a lot of sports, seeds matter (because of homecourt advantage and match-ups). --[[User:H-Hurry|H-Hurry]] ([[User talk:H-Hurry|talk]]) 22:36, 16 February 2018 (UTC)
| RD1 = Quarterfinals<br>February 14–15
| RD2 = Semifinals <br>February 17
| RD3 =[[#Final|Final]]<br>February 18
| seed-width =
Line 720 ⟶ 716:
}}
* {{ping|H-Hurry}} You can use seeds in Module:RoundN via [[Template:RDseed]]. —[[User:Codehydro|<
== Nomination of [[:Galactic quadrant (Star Trek)]] for deletion ==
Line 815 ⟶ 811:
I'm recommending a change to [[Template:Scribunto/helper]] but I'd like you to take a look at it first to make sure I'm not going to break anything. [[User:davidwr|davidwr]]/<small><small>([[User_talk:davidwr|talk]])/([[Special:Contributions/Davidwr|contribs]])</small></small> 21:29, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
*{{ping|davidwr}} Thank you checking. The edit is fairly harmless though doesn't do anything either. Your addition of ";" after the last item in CSS is unnecessary because that symbol is defined as a separator; its sole purpose is to separate one declaration from the next and if there is no next declaration then it is unnecessary. Here's the [https://www.w3.org/TR/CSS2/syndata.html#declaration documentation on how to use CSS declarations from W3C]--the organization which defines the CSS standards. Notice how in their example, they do not place a semi-colon after the final declaration. Adding an extra semi-colon at the end of a list only just slightly increases the size of the page by one byte each time it's done (and multiplied by the number of times this template is used). For example, your change would increase the download size of [[Module:Buffer/doc]] by about 300 bytes without any beneficial effect on the rendering of that page. That said, nowadays even a thousand bytes is rather trivial so thus your edit is harmless. —[[User:Codehydro|<
**{{re|Codehydro}} I'm confused. The note on [[Template talk:Scribunto]] had nothing to do with semicolons. [[User:davidwr|davidwr]]/<small><small>([[User_talk:davidwr|talk]])/([[Special:Contributions/Davidwr|contribs]])</small></small> 16:54, 24 August 2020 (UTC)
***{{re|davidwr}} I misread your message and thought you already made the change, so I was only looking at the most recent edit, but I actually read your post in the talk page now. I tested your suggestion and it does work, though I had to implement the change in [[Template:Scribunto/helper2]] as well to kill the category. —[[User:Codehydro|<
****Thanks. I added trivial /doc sub-pages to these helper templates to aide navigation. I also created redirects for these helper templates' talk pages that redirect to main template's talk page. See [[Special:PrefixIndex/Template:Scribunto/]] for a current list of sub-pages of the main template. [[User:davidwr|davidwr]]/<small><small>([[User_talk:davidwr|talk]])/([[Special:Contributions/Davidwr|contribs]])</small></small> 16:37, 25 August 2020 (UTC)
== ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message ==
<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2020|2020 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2020|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2020#Election timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2020/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2020|poll}}|voting page]]'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. [[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 02:27, 24 November 2020 (UTC)
</td></tr>
</table>
<!-- Message sent by User:Xaosflux@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2020/Coordination/MMS/04&oldid=990308269 -->
==[[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|Speedy deletion]] nomination of [[:Template:Stub/sandbox/Template:Stub]]==
[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|48px|left|alt=|link=]]
{{Quote box|quote=<p>If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read [[WP:Your first article|the guide to writing your first article]].</p><p>You may want to consider using the [[Wikipedia:Article wizard|Article Wizard]] to help you create articles.</p>|width=20%|align=right}}
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that [[:Template:Stub/sandbox/Template:Stub]], a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|criteria for speedy deletion]], by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
*It appears to be a test page. (See [[WP:CSD#G2|section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion]].) Please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]] for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the [[Wikipedia:Welcome, newcomers|welcome page]] if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by [[:Template:Stub/sandbox/Template:Stub|visiting the page]] and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with [[Wikipedia:List of policies|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]]. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the {{Querylink|Special:Log|qs=type=delete&page=Template%3AStub%2Fsandbox%2FTemplate%3AStub|deleting administrator}}, or if you have already done so, you can place a request [[WP:RFUD|here]]. [[User:JsfasdF252|JsfasdF252]] ([[User talk:JsfasdF252|talk]]) 14:36, 2 January 2021 (UTC)
== Nomination for merging of [[:Module:RoundN]] ==
[[File:Information.svg|30px|alt=|link=]][[:Module:RoundN]] has been [[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion|nominated for merging]] with [[Template:Team bracket]]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at [[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 February 10#:Module:RoundN|'''the template's entry''' on the Templates for discussion page]]. Thank you.<!--Template:Tfmnotice--> [[User:Hhkohh|Hhkohh]] ([[User talk:Hhkohh|talk]]) 19:34, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
== Issue with [[module:RoundN]] ==
Hi, see the example below, a very basic bracket. Parameters used {{para|bold_winner|high}} and {{para|score-boxes|2+sum}}.
{{#invoke:RoundN|N4
|bold_winner=high
|score-boxes=2+sum
|Match 1|A|2|0|B|1|2
|Match 2|C|3|1|D|0|4
|Match 3|B|3|0|C|0|2
}}
Suppose this is according to the UEFA Champions League concept. Teams play each twice, once at home, once away. Team with the most goals in total over 2 matches proceeds. In case both teams tie on total goals, the team with the most away goals proceeds. In "match 1" and "match 3" the result is as expected. Team "B" is bolded. In "match 2" however, no team is bolded because of the 4 4 in the fourth column (third scorebox column). But team "C" should be bolded because they scored 1 away goal and team "D" 0.
Suppose the 8 boxes for a match are:
{| class="wikitable"
|T1||S11||S12||S13
|-
|T2||S21||S22||S23
|}
Now the code will be something like (this is not supposed to be LUA code):
<syntaxhighlight lang="text">
if S13 > S23
then
bold T1 line
elif S23 > S13
then
bold T2 line
fi
</syntaxhighlight>
Could it be changed to something like:
<syntaxhighlight lang="text">
if S13 > S23
then
bold T1 line
elif S23 > S13
then
bold T2 line
else
if S12 > S21
then
bold T1 line
elif S22 > S11
then
bold T2 line
fi
fi
</syntaxhighlight>
Of course, the above is somewhere in the code which handles "bold_winner" to be "high". If it would be "low" the "<" and ">" need to be swapped. Although it's not LUA code, I assume you get my drift. --[[User:Sb008|Sb008]] ([[User talk:Sb008|talk]]) 16:17, 3 March 2021 (UTC)
:*{{ping|Sb008}} Two issues about hard coding that suggestion into RoundN. First, is that non-UEFA tournaments may not have the same way of handling tiebreakers. Maybe somewhere would favor the home goals instead of away? Second, is that there's no way of knowing which round is the away round for which team; the numbers themselves don't say and, looking only at the module input, I could easily interpret the 2nd game of match 2 as Team D's away game, (and that team D got 4 away goals versus team C's 3 away goals, and so team D won). That said, my suggestion is to simply manually bold the name of winner manually with wikimarkup. The sum box won't be bolded, but the bold team name should be obvious enough (as well as advancement to the next round). Optionally you can throw in a ref note?
{{#invoke:RoundN|N4
|bold_winner=high
|score-boxes=2+sum
|Match 1|Team A|2|0|Team B|1|2
|Match 2|'''Team C'''<ref group="tiebreaker">Per UEFA rules, in the event of a tie, the team with more away goals wins. Team C scored 1 away versus team D's 0.</ref>|3|1|Team D|0|4
|Match 3|Team B|3|0|Team C|0|2
}}
<references group=tiebreaker/>
:Personally I think leaving the sum box unbolded is better since they're both 4's and that bolding the team name with wikimarkup is adequate. Let me know if my suggestion works for you. —[[User:Codehydro|<b style="color:#aaaaaa; font-family:Unicode; font-size:12pt;">Code</b>]][[User talk:Codehydro|<b style="color:#5577aa">Hydro</b>]] 15:18, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
:: Thx for replying. It's common practise to list the teams in accordance with the first leg. So, team "C" listed 1st and team "D" listed 2nd (for match 2) means "C" played the first leg at home. I don't know any format (which doesn't mean there isn't one) where in case of a tie, the team with the most home goals will proceed. It's away goals because it's considered harder to score an away goal than a home goal. And it's not just UEFA (actually FIFA) rules, it applies for handball as well [[2008–09 EHF Champions League#Qualification_Round]] (1st match listed, Kaunas 32 away goals and Brest only 27) and probably more sports. There aren't that many sports where they use a 2leg knockout system. But in regular leagues it's commmon. The ranking is in general based on: most points, best goal difference, most goals scored for '''all''' matches, hth points, hth goal difference, '''hth away goals'''. Using wikimarkup is only partly possible. I can only bold the teambox but not the sumbox. Of course, I can solve that too by not using {{para|bold_winner|high}} at all and using {{para|score-boxes|3}} instead of {{para|score-boxes|2+sum}}. But I lose the advantage of using {{para|bold_winner}} and have to fill in the agg. score manually, only cause of 1, maybe 2 matches in a bracket. Would {{para|boldmatch10|1}} or {{para|boldmatch10|2}} (where 10 is the matchnumber like in "skipmatch" and "1" to indicate the 1st team listed in match 10 and "2" to indicate the 2nd team listed ) be an option? --[[User:Sb008|Sb008]] ([[User talk:Sb008|talk]]) 17:06, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
:::{{ping|Sb008}} Hmm, I'm still reluctant to code it so that it assumes the top team is playing the home game in the first round because that practice, while perhaps common, probably isn't universal. For example, in match 3, if team C had played in match 1 instead, often times Team C would be listed on top because match 1 is above match 2 regardless of who played home in the first round (just going with the flow of the table). And often times the flow is dictated by which match was played first, but home or away may be decided by a coin flip. Perhaps the solution that gives the user the most control is that, where there is a tie, the sum box would be bolded if the team name is bolded via wikimark up. In other words, by my adding bold text to Team C, it would also make the sum box bold too. Does this solution work for you? Also may take me a while to find the time to do it. —[[User:Codehydro|<b style="color: #aaaaaa; font-family: Unicode; font-size:12pt;">Code</b>]][[User talk:Codehydro|<b style="color: #5577aa">Hydro</b>]] 13:59, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
:::: The "match X" strings I only used to indicate which match I'm talking about. Normally there's a date at that position. If someone would swap "match 1" and "match 2", and keep "match 3 as is, he/she created n incorrect bracket. The first team listed in "match 3" has to be from the topbranch and not the bottombranch. Only if team "C" would be, the home team in the 1st leg of "match 3", "match 1" and "match 2" would need to be swapped. Frankly, I've never seen someone making the mistake you describe. Note, I don't claim it doesn't exist, only that I've never seen it. And implementing it as I suggested only forces people to create a correct bracket. Matches have to be swapped so often, because you can tell only after the draw who is going to play who and who and who will be the home team in the 1st leg. For example [[:nl:UEFA Champions League 2020/21#Knock-outfase|UEFA Champions League 2020/21 Knock-out phase]]. The boxes for 2nd and 3rd round are intentially kept hidden, cause until the draw it's unknown who will play who and showing the boxes already, would imply you already know who's potentially playing who. Luckily the draw for the 2nd round up till the final are at the same time. The draw of the 3rd round will be, the winner of match X against the winner of match Y, where the winner in match X will be the home team in the 1st leg. Similaar like in a seeded tournament (e.g. Wimbledon). The only difference is that in a seeded tourmament there're no draws. The full bracket is known upfront based on the seeds. Have a look at {{tl|64TeamBracket}} where the seeds are filled in. Names are filled in, in the 1st round, based on the players seed, and you can tell exactly who might meet who in the 2nd, 3rd round etc. --[[User:Sb008|Sb008]] ([[User talk:Sb008|talk]]) 14:50, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
::::: See: [[Away goals rule]] --[[User:Sb008|Sb008]] ([[User talk:Sb008|talk]]) 23:40, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
== ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message ==
<table class="messagebox " style="border: 1px solid #AAA; background: ivory; padding: 0.5em; width: 100%;">
<tr><td style="vertical-align:middle; padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</td><td>Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2021|2021 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2021|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2021#Election timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2021/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2021|poll}}|voting page]]'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 00:31, 23 November 2021 (UTC)</small>
</td></tr>
</table>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2021/Coordination/MM/04&oldid=1056563273 -->
== Orphan function in RoundN ==
The orphan function doesn't appear to be working in [[Ice hockey at the 2022 Winter Olympics – Men's tournament#Bracket]]. The teams are reseeded between the quarterfinals and semifinals. The bottom half looks fine, but the bracket won't go away in the top half. Can you offer any guidance? Thanks in advance. [[User:Taxman1913|Taxman1913]] ([[User talk:Taxman1913|talk]]) 08:10, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
* {{ping|Taxman1913}} Hmm, orphan may need to be reworked. The node functions were something extra I threw on RoundN because I wanted to make the module more customizable but I never really finished implementing them because at the time nobody used them. In the meantime, you may be able to work around it by nesting multiple RoundNs in a table like so?
:<!-- no! -->
{|
|
{| class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed"
!Nested RoundN in table
|-
|{{#invoke:RoundN|N4
|widescore=yes|bold_winner=high
|skipmatch=2
|omit_blanks=yes
|RD1=Playoffs
|RD2=Quarterfinals
<!--Date-Place/Team 1/Score 1/Team 2/Score 2 -->
<!--playoffs-->
|15 February|{{ih|SVK}}|4|{{ih|GER}}|0
<!--quarterfinals-->
|16 February|{{ih|USA}}|2|{{ih|SVK}} ([[Overtime (ice hockey)#Shootout|GWS]])|3
}}{{#invoke:RoundN|N4
|widescore=yes|bold_winner=high
|skipmatch=2
|omit_blanks=yes
|no_column_head=yes
<!--Date-Place/Team 1/Score 1/Team 2/Score 2 -->
<!--playoffs-->
|15 February|{{ih|CZE}}|2|{{ih|SUI}}|4
<!--quarterfinals-->
|16 February|{{ih|FIN}}|5|{{ih|SUI}}|1
}}{{#invoke:RoundN|N4
|widescore=yes|bold_winner=high
|skipmatch=2
|omit_blanks=yes
|no_column_head=yes
<!--Date-Place/Team 1/Score 1/Team 2/Score 2 -->
<!--playoffs-->
|15 February|{{ih|DEN}}|3|{{ih|LAT}}|2
<!--quarterfinals-->
|16 February|{{ih|RUS|roc-olympics|name=ROC}}|3|{{ih|DEN}}|1
}}{{#invoke:RoundN|N4
|widescore=yes|bold_winner=high
|skipmatch=2
|omit_blanks=yes
|no_column_head=yes
<!--Date-Place/Team 1/Score 1/Team 2/Score 2 -->
<!--playoffs-->
|15 February|{{ih|CAN}}|7|{{ih|CHN}}|2
<!--quarterfinals-->
|16 February|{{ih|SWE}}||{{ih|CAN}}|
}}
|style="vertical-align:top"|{{#invoke:RoundN|N4
|widescore=yes|bold_winner=high
|3rdplace=yes
|omit_blanks=yes
|RD1=Semifinals
|RD2=Gold medal game
|Consol=Bronze medal game
<!--semifinals-->
|18 February|{{ih|FIN}}||{{ih|SVK}}|
|18 February|{{ih|RUS|roc-olympics|name=ROC}}|||
<!--final-->
|20 February||||
<!--third place-->
|19 February||||
}}
|}
|-
|
{| class="mw-collapsible mw-collapsed"
!Original
|-
|{{#invoke:RoundN|N16
|widescore=yes|bold_winner=high
|3rdplace=yes
|skipmatch=1;3;5;7
|omit_blanks=yes
|RD1=Playoffs
|RD2=Quarterfinals
|RD3=Semifinals
|RD4=Gold medal game
|Consol=Bronze medal game
<!--Date-Place/Team 1/Score 1/Team 2/Score 2 -->
<!--playoffs-->
|15 February|{{ih|SVK}}|4|{{ih|GER}}|0
|15 February|{{ih|CZE}}|2|{{ih|SUI}}|4
|15 February|{{ih|DEN}}|3|{{ih|LAT}}|2
|15 February|{{ih|CAN}}|7|{{ih|CHN}}|2
<!--quarterfinals-->
|node_function{orphan}16 February|{{ih|USA}}|2|{{ih|SVK}} ([[Overtime (ice hockey)#Shootout|GWS]])|3
|node_function{orphan}16 February|{{ih|FIN}}|5|{{ih|SUI}}|1
|node_function{orphan}16 February|{{ih|RUS|roc-olympics|name=ROC}}|3|{{ih|DEN}}|1
|node_function{orphan}16 February|{{ih|SWE}}||{{ih|CAN}}|
<!--semifinals-->
|18 February|{{ih|FIN}}||{{ih|SVK}}|
|18 February|{{ih|RUS|roc-olympics|name=ROC}}|||
<!--final-->
|20 February||||
<!--third place-->
|19 February||||
}}
|}
|} —[[User:Codehydro|<b style="color: #aaaaaa; font-family: Unicode; font-size:12pt;">Code</b>]][[User talk:Codehydro|<b style="color: #5577aa">Hydro</b>]] 13:38, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
::* Or another alternative workaround:
<!-- ::: no! -->
{{#invoke:RoundN|N32
|widescore=yes|bold_winner=high
|3rdplace=yes
|skipmatch=1;3-4;6;7-9;11-12;14;15-16;18;20;22;24-28
|omit_blanks=yes|flex_tree=yes
|RD1=Playoffs
|RD2=Quarterfinals
|RD3=(reseed)
|RD4=Semifinals
|RD5=Gold medal game
|Consol=Bronze medal game
<!--Date-Place/Team 1/Score 1/Team 2/Score 2 -->
<!--playoffs-->
|15 February|{{ih|SVK}}|4|{{ih|GER}}|0
|15 February|{{ih|CZE}}|2|{{ih|SUI}}|4
|15 February|{{ih|DEN}}|3|{{ih|LAT}}|2
|15 February|{{ih|CAN}}|7|{{ih|CHN}}|2
<!--quarterfinals-->
|16 February|{{ih|USA}}|2|{{ih|SVK}} ([[Overtime (ice hockey)#Shootout|GWS]])|3
|16 February|{{ih|FIN}}|5|{{ih|SUI}}|1
|16 February|{{ih|RUS|roc-olympics|name=ROC}}|3|{{ih|DEN}}|1
|16 February|{{ih|SWE}}||{{ih|CAN}}|
<!--semifinals-->
|18 February|{{ih|FIN}}||{{ih|SVK}}|
|18 February|{{ih|RUS|roc-olympics|name=ROC}}|||
<!--final-->
|20 February||||
<!--third place-->
|19 February||||
}} —[[User:Codehydro|<b style="color: #aaaaaa; font-family: Unicode; font-size:12pt;">Code</b>]][[User talk:Codehydro|<b style="color: #5577aa">Hydro</b>]] 14:14, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
FOOBAR
::Thanks for responding and for all your hard work on this module. [[User:Taxman1913|Taxman1913]] ([[User talk:Taxman1913|talk]]) 17:42, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
==[[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|Speedy deletion]] nomination of [[:Category:CSS image crop using invalid Link format]]==
[[File:Ambox warning pn.svg|48px|left|alt=|link=]]
A tag has been placed on [[:Category:CSS image crop using invalid Link format]] requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
<blockquote>It may meet Wikipedia's [[WP:CSD|criteria for speedy deletion]] under [[Wikipedia:CSD#G8|CSD G8]]</blockquote>
Under the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|criteria for speedy deletion]], pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may '''contest the nomination''' by [[:Category:CSS image crop using invalid Link format|visiting the page]] and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with [[Wikipedia:List of policies|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]]. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the {{Querylink|Special:Log|qs=type=delete&page=Category%3ACSS+image+crop+using+invalid+Link+format|deleting administrator}}, or if you have already done so, you can place a request [[WP:RFUD|here]]. <!-- Template:Db-reason-notice --><!-- Template:CSD-warn --> —[[User:Andrybak|andrybak]] ([[User talk:Andrybak|talk]]) 19:23, 8 October 2022 (UTC)
== ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message ==
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px;">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2022|2022 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2022|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2022#Election timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2022/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2022|poll}}|voting page]]'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)</small>
</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2022/Coordination/MM/03&oldid=1124425182 -->
== Your signature ==
Hello, I discovered your signature this evening due to the use of the obsolete tag <nowiki><font></nowiki>.
Would you be willing to update your signature to an html5 compliant, error free equivalent?<br/>
This:<br/>
<nowiki>[[User:Codehydro|<b style="color: #aaaaaa; font-family: Unicode; font-size:12pt;">Code</b>]][[User talk:Codehydro|<b style="color: #5577aa">Hydro</b>]]</nowiki>
<br/>gives you the identically presenting: [[User:Codehydro|<b style="color: #aaaaaa; font-family: Unicode; font-size:12pt;">Code</b>]][[User talk:Codehydro|<b style="color: #5577aa">Hydro</b>]]
Thank you and hope you have a great evening, [[User:Zinnober9|Zinnober9]] ([[User talk:Zinnober9|talk]]) 03:38, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
*{{ping|User:Zinnober9}} Hadn't changed my sig in 13 years. I'd come up with a better look but too much effort 🤣—[[User:Codehydro|<b style="color:#aaa;font:bold 12pt Unicode">Code</b>]][[User talk:Codehydro|<b style="color:#57a">Hydro</b>]] 17:48, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
== Template editor granted ==
[[File:Wikipedia Template editor icon (1).svg|right|130px]]
Your account has been granted the "{{mono|templateeditor}}" user permission, allowing you to edit [[WP:TEMPLATE|templates]] and [[WP:MODULE|modules]] that have been protected with [[WP:TEMP-P|template protection]]. It also allows you to bypass the [[MediaWiki:Titleblacklist|title blacklist]], giving you the ability to create and edit [[WP:EDITNOTICE|editnotices]]. Before you use this user right, please read '''[[Wikipedia:Template editor]]''' and make sure you understand its contents. In particular, you should read the section on [[Wikipedia:Template editors#Wise template editing|wise template editing]] and the [[Wikipedia:Template editor#Criteria for revocation|criteria for revocation]].
You can use this user right to perform maintenance, answer edit requests, and make any other simple and generally uncontroversial edits to templates, modules, and edinotices. You can also use it to enact more complex or controversial edits, '''after''' those edits are first made to a test sandbox, and their technical reliability as well as their [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] among other informed editors has been established. If you are willing to process [[Wikipedia:Edit requests|edit requests]] on templates and modules, keep in mind that you are taking responsibility to ensure the edits have consensus and are technically sound.
This user right gives you access to some of Wikipedia's most important templates and modules; it is critical that you edit them wisely and that you only make edits that are backed up by consensus. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to [[Wikipedia:User account security|secure your password]].
If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.
If you were granted the permission on a temporary basis you will need to re-apply for the permission a few days before it expires including in your request a permalink to the discussion where it was granted and a {{tl|ping}} for the administrator who granted the permission. You can find the permalink in your [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log/rights&page=User:Codehydro rights log].
;Useful links
* <span class="plainlinks">[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3AProtectedPages&namespace=&type=edit&level=templateeditor All template-protected pages]</span>
* [[User:AnomieBOT/TPERTable]] – outstanding template-protected edit requests (bot-generated)
* [[Wikipedia:Requests for page protection#Current requests for reduction in protection level|Request fully-protected templates or modules be downgraded to template protection]]
Happy template editing! <!-- Template:Template editor granted --> <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.118em 0.118em 0.118em;" class="texhtml"> '''[[User:Salvio giuliano|Salvio]]''' '''[[User talk:Salvio giuliano|<sup>giuliano</sup>]]'''</span> 23:00, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
== Nomination for deletion of [[Template:Avatar: The Last Airbender/sandbox]] ==
[[File:Ambox warning blue.svg|30px|link=]][[Template:Avatar: The Last Airbender/sandbox]] has been [[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion|nominated for deletion]]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at [[Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2023 November 1#Template:Avatar: The Last Airbender/sandbox|'''the entry on the Templates for discussion page''']].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> [[User:Mika1h|Mika1h]] ([[User talk:Mika1h|talk]]) 09:34, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
== ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message ==
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #AAA; background-color: ivory; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em; flex: 1 0 40px; max-width: 100px">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2023|2023 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2023#Election timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2023/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|poll}}|voting page]]'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)</small>
</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2023/Coordination/MM/03&oldid=1187132125 -->
== Problems with transclusion ==
hello, [[User:Codehydro|Codehydro]] I would like to point to a problem I faced through editing in the page [[2013 COSAFA Cup]] I tried to transclude the section bracket which was made using the module RoundN, but when I try to do so nothing appear so I will be very thankful if you can identify where the problem is. [[User:Mo Amine M|Mo Amine M]] ([[User talk:Mo Amine M|talk]]) 04:06, 27 September 2024 (UTC)
:I am not sure what you mean by section bracket. Can you show screenshots or describe clearly what text is supposed to be displayed? —[[User:Codehydro|<b style="color:#aaa;font:bold 12pt Unicode">Code</b>]][[User talk:Codehydro|<b style="color:#57a">Hydro</b>]] 03:46, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
== ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message ==
<div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; ">
<div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">[[File:Scale of justice 2.svg|40px]]</div>
<div class="ivmbox-text">
Hello! Voting in the '''[[WP:ACE2024|2024 Arbitration Committee elections]]''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All '''[[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2024#Election timeline|eligible users]]''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The [[WP:ARBCOM|Arbitration Committee]] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the [[Wikipedia:Arbitration|Wikipedia arbitration process]]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose [[WP:BAN|site bans]], [[WP:TBAN|topic bans]], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The [[Wikipedia:Arbitration/Policy|arbitration policy]] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review [[Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2024/Candidates|the candidates]] and submit your choices on the '''[[Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|poll}}|voting page]]'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>[[User:MediaWiki message delivery|MediaWiki message delivery]] ([[User talk:MediaWiki message delivery|talk]]) 00:20, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small>
</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/03&oldid=1258243506 -->
| |||