Wikipedia:Historical archive/GNE project files/GNE Project Design: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
MikeWarren (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
m 4 revisions imported: import old edits from "GNEProjectDesign" and "GNE Project Files/GNE Project Design" in the August 2001 database dump |
||
| (13 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
More thoughts by [[User:MikeWarren|MikeWarren]] about GNE. See also
'''Introduction'''
As discussion rages over moderation and back-end design, I thought I'd write a more
Line 9:
different groups of people.
'''Editing'''
Authors may like to take advantage of editors. Volunteers who wish to edit work can
Line 19:
repository.
'''Article Repository'''
There should exist a large group of moderators (hopefully everyone in the project) for
Line 65:
123456.3.en
'''Classifiers'''
Everybody seems to have their own favourite way of classifying articles, from voting to
Line 95:
number of schemes to classify the article in question.
'''Software'''
So, what software does GNE need to write? If we use TEI as the representation format,
Line 111:
immediately as well.
'''Conclusion'''
I propose that four groups are formed immediately:
'Backend' :: This group will set up and manage the back-end server. It should do
nothing more than accept submissions in DTD-compliant XML, accept revised
versions of the same document and accept signatures for existing documents. From
Line 123:
or not multimedia will be inline in the XML or served as separate files.
'Editing' :: This group will provide editing services for authors. Any author can submit
their article to the group for comments, although this will obviously not be a
requirement.
'Classification' :: This group will write the first generic classifier project, which will be
targeted as being a template for other more specific classifier projects to use.
'Conversion' :: This group will work on methods and programs for efficiently
converting submitted articles into TEI. Emphasis should be on making it easy for
(especially) academic groups to submit articles, so LaTeX might be a good first choice
| |||