Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stenchgantor: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
close - delete |
m Fix Linter errors. |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 0 auto; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below
<!--
Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PAGENAME (2nd nomination)]]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->
Line 8:
This article seems bogus to me. If it can be verified and improved great, if not it needs to be deleted. [[User:Dapoloplayer|Dapoloplayer]] 04:03, September 2, 2005 (UTC)
*The book is certainly real, see [http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/0439424690/ref=dp_return_1/002-4512852-9872040?%5Fencoding=UTF8&n=283155&s=books&v=glance Amazon's entry]. I don't know if it is a notable book though, most of the reviews on that page seem to suggest that it is just rubbish. '''No vote'''. [[User:Sjakkalle|Sjakkalle]] [[User talk:Sjakkalle|<small>(Check!)</small>]] 06:21, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
*<
*'''Delete''' - The book is real, but this charachter is not notable. [[User:Cmadler|Cmadler]] 12:34, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
*'''Delete''' nn. [[User:UniReb|UniReb]] 13:31, 2 September 2005 (UTC)
:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <
|