Content deleted Content added
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 66:
I'm not sure that image should just be removed, or whether it make sense in the section anyway. [[User:Volker Siegel|Volker Siegel]] ([[User talk:Volker Siegel|talk]]) 14:18, 24 January 2022 (UTC)
:Just to make this point clear: The reparameterization trick is for the gradients! The trick separates the source of randomness to another node in the DAG that does not have any parameters, so that we can propagate gradients through the rest of the DAG that is now a deterministic function. [[Special:Contributions/82.102.110.228|82.102.110.228]] ([[User talk:82.102.110.228|talk]]) 18:57, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
== This is a highly technical topic ==
Line 84 ⟶ 86:
:I agree p_theta(z) doesn't make sense. [[User:EitanPorat|EitanPorat]] ([[User talk:EitanPorat|talk]]) 00:17, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
::Agreed. It should be p_phi(z) or even better q_phi(z). [[Special:Contributions/46.199.5.20|46.199.5.20]] ([[User talk:46.199.5.20|talk]]) 20:22, 26 December 2024 (UTC)
== Rating this article C-class ==
| |||