Talk:In-memory database: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
Cewbot (talk | contribs)
 
(9 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{Talk header}}
{{WikiProject Computing|class=C|importance=}}
{{WPDATABASEWikiProject banner shell|class=C|importance1=high}}
{{WikiProject Computing|importance=high|software=yes|software-importance=top}}
{{WikiProject Computing|class=CComputer science|importance=high}}
{{WikiProject Databases| importance = top |computer-science-importance=high}}
}}
 
=="Main memory" or "in memory"==
I think the title of this article is mistaken. The expression "in-memory database" is much more popular than "main memory database". As evidence, I cite Google News and Yahoo News. Both of them return 5 or 6 hits for "in-memory", but none for "main memory". Moreover, the popular Computer Desktop Encyclopedia (www.computerlanguage.com) titles its article "in-memory database". Any objections to changing the title of this article? [[User:Westwind273|Westwind273]] 23:34, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
Line 7 ⟶ 12:
 
==Key questions==
{{incomplete}}
The article does not describe how the database system collect its user data from startup. And I think that is one of the main questions regarding this technology. Could some one write a few words on sentences about that? <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Linbenming|Linbenming]] ([[User talk:Linbenming|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Linbenming|contribs]]) 06:51, 28 April 2011 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
 
==Nokia-Siemens Networks “One-NDS”==
Deleted from the list of in-memory database systems because this is a vertical solution (Home Location Register/Home Subscriber Server) rather than a database system. We should stick to database systems in order to preserve the integrity of the page. <small><span class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Jatujak|Jatujak]] ([[User talk:Jatujak|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Jatujak|contribs]]) 04:19, 15 February 2010 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
 
"One-NDS" is the whole system, but the database server product underneath that serves the applications (and is confusingly also called the NDS) is an in-memory database system. Unfortunately I can't provide any citations but there might be some manuals floating around the internet that can verify that [[User:Dichohecho|Dichohecho]] ([[User talk:Dichohecho|talk]]) 17:53, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
 
== Products List ==
Line 86 ⟶ 92:
:I lack sufficient knowledge on this subject, but it does sound like vaporware. Should we just delete everything added?
:Is NVDIMM a vendor-specific term? In that case, should NVDIMM simply redirect to [[NVRAM]] (which is presumably vendor-neutral)? -- [[user:intgr|intgr]]&nbsp;<small>[[user talk:intgr|[talk]]]</small> 20:28, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
 
== External links modified ==
 
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
 
I have just modified one external link on [[In-memory database]]. Please take a moment to review [[special:diff/809948481|my edit]]. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit [[User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot|this simple FaQ]] for additional information. I made the following changes:
*Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130201211812/http://slashdot.org/topic/datacenter/the-rise-of-in-memory-databases/ to http://slashdot.org/topic/datacenter/the-rise-of-in-memory-databases/
 
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
 
{{sourcecheck|checked=false|needhelp=}}
 
Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 14:36, 12 November 2017 (UTC)