Functional equation (L-function): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(40 intermediate revisions by 32 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{More citations needed|date=December 2009}}
In [[mathematics]], the [[L-function]]s of [[number theory]] have certain '''[[functional equation]]s''', as one of their characteristic properties. There is an elaborate theory of what these should be; much of it still conjectural. For example, the [[Riemann zeta-function]] has a functional equation relating its value at the [[complex number]] ''s'' with its value at 1 − ''s''. In every case this relates to some value ζ(''s'') that is only defined by [[analytic continuation]] from the [[infinite series]] definition. That is, writing as is conventional σ for the real part of ''s'', the functional equation relates the cases
In [[mathematics]], the [[L-function|''L''-function]]s of [[number theory]] are expected to have several characteristic properties, one of which is that they satisfy certain '''[[functional equation]]s'''. There is an elaborate theory of what these equations should be, much of which is still conjectural.
 
== Introduction ==
:&sigma; > 1 and &sigma; < 0,
 
InA [[mathematics]], the [[L-function]]s of [[number theory]] have certain '''[[functional equation]]s''', as one of their characteristic properties. There is an elaborate theory of what these should be; much of it still conjectural. Forprototypical example, the [[Riemann zeta- function]] has a functional equation relating its value at the [[complex number]] ''s'' with its value at 1 &minus; ''s''. In every case this relates to some value &zeta;ζ(''s'') that is only defined by [[analytic continuation]] from the [[infinite series]] definition. That is, writing{{spaced ndash}}as is conventional{{spaced &sigma;ndash}}σ for the real part of ''s'', the functional equation relates the cases
and also changes a case with
 
:0σ <> &sigma;1 and σ < 10,
 
and also changes a case with
in the ''critical strip'' to another such case, reflected in the line &sigma; = &frac12;. Therefore use of the functional equation is basic, in order to study the zeta-function in the whole [[complex plane]].
 
:0 < σ < 1
The functional equation in question for the Riemann zeta-function takes the simple form
 
in the ''critical strip'' to another such case, reflected in the line &sigma;σ = &frac12;½. Therefore, use of the functional equation is basic, in order to study the zeta-function in the whole [[complex plane]].
:''Z''(''s'') = ''Z''(1 &minus; ''s'')
 
The functional equation in question for the Riemann zeta- function takes the simple form
where ''Z''(''s'') is multiplied by a ''gamma-factor'', involving the [[Gamma function]]. This is now read as an 'extra' factor in the [[Euler product]] for the zeta-function, corresponding to the [[infinite prime]]. Just the same shape of functional equation holds for the [[Dedekind zeta-function]] of a [[number field]] ''K'', with an appropriate gamma-factor that depends only the embeddings of ''K'' (in algebraic terms, on the [[tensor product of fields|tensor product]] of ''K'' with the [[real field]]).
 
:<math>Z(s) = Z(1-s) \, </math>
There is a similar equation for the [[Dirichlet L-function]]s, but this time relating them in pairs:
 
where ''Z''(''s'') is ζ(''s'') multiplied by a ''gamma-factor'', involving the [[Gammagamma function]]. This is now read as an 'extra' factor in the [[Euler product]] for the zeta-function, corresponding to the [[infinite prime]]. Just the same shape of functional equation holds for the [[Dedekind zeta- function]] of a [[number field]] ''K'', with an appropriate gamma-factor that depends only on the embeddings of ''K'' (in algebraic terms, on the [[tensor product of fields|tensor product]] of ''K'' with the [[real number|real field]]).
:<math>\Lambda(s,\chi)=\varepsilon\Lambda(1-s,\chi^*)</math>
 
There is a similar equation for the [[Dirichlet L-function]]s, but this time relating them in pairs:<ref>{{cite web|url=https://dlmf.nist.gov/25.15 |title=§25.15 Dirichlet -functions on NIST}}</ref>
with &chi; a (primitive) [[Dirichlet character]], &chi;<sup>*</sup> its complex conjugate, ''&Lambda;'' the L-function multiplied by a gamma-factor, and &epsilon; a complex number of [[absolute value]] 1, of shape
 
:<math>\Lambda(s,\chi)=\varepsilon\Lambda(1-s,\chi^*)</math>
:''G''(&chi;)/|''G''(&chi;)|
 
with &chi;χ a (primitive) [[primitive Dirichlet character]], &chi;χ<sup>*</sup> its complex conjugate, ''&Lambda;''Λ the L-function multiplied by a gamma-factor, and &epsilon;ε a complex number of [[absolute value]] 1, of shape
where ''G''(&chi;) is a [[Gauss sum]] formed from &chi;. This equation has the same function on both sides if and only if &chi; is a ''real character'', taking values in {0,1,&minus;1}. Then &epsilon; must be 1 or &minus;1, and the case of the value &minus;1 would imply a zero of ''&Lambda;''(''s'') at ''s'' = &frac12;. According to the theory (of Gauss, in effect) of Gauss sums, the value is always 1, so no such ''simple'' zero can exist (the function is ''even'' about the point).
 
:<math>G(\chi) \over {\left |G(\chi)\right \vert}</math>
A unified theory of such functional equations was given by [[Erich Hecke]], and the theory taken up again in ''[[Tate's thesis]]'' by [[John Tate]]. Hecke found generalised characters of number fields. now called [[Hecke character]]s, for which his proof (based on [[theta function]]s) also worked. These characters and their associated L-functions are now understood to be strictly related to [[complex multiplication]], as the Dirichlet characters are to [[cyclotomic field]]s.
 
where ''G''(&chi;χ) is a [[Gauss sum]] formed from &chi;χ. This equation has the same function on both sides if and only if &chi;χ is a ''real character'', taking values in {0,1,&minus;1}. Then &epsilon;ε must be 1 or &minus;1, and the case of the value &minus;1 would imply a zero of ''&Lambda;Λ''(''s'') at ''s'' = &frac12;½. According to the theory (of Gauss, in effect) of Gauss sums, the value is always 1, so no such ''simple'' zero can exist (the function is ''even'' about the point).
There are also functional equations for the [[local zeta-function]]s, arising at a fundamental level for the (analogue of) [[Poincaré duality]] in [[étale cohomology]]. The Euler products of the [[Hasse-Weil zeta-function]] for an [[algebraic variety]] ''V'' over a number field ''K'', formed by reducing ''modulo'' [[prime ideal]]s to get local zeta-functions, are conjectured to have a ''global'' functional equation; but this is currently considered out of reach except in special cases. The definition can be read directly out of étale cohomology theory, again; but in general some assumption coming from [[automorphic representation]] theory seems required to get the functional equation. The [[Taniyama-Shimura conjecture]] was a particular case of this as general theory. By relating the gamma-factor aspect to [[Hodge theory]], and detailed studies of the expected &epsilon; factor, the theory as empirical has been brought to quite a refined state, even if proofs are missing.
 
== Theory of functional equations ==
==See also==
 
A unified theory of such functional equations was given by [[Erich Hecke]], and the theory was taken up again in ''[[Tate's thesis]]'' by [[John Tate (mathematician)|John Tate]]. Hecke found generalised characters of number fields., now called [[Hecke character]]s, for which his proof (based on [[theta function]]s) also worked. These characters and their associated L-functions are now understood to be strictly related to [[complex multiplication]], as the Dirichlet characters are to [[cyclotomic field]]s.
[[explicit formula (L-function)]], [[approximate functional equation]]
 
There are also functional equations for the [[local zeta-function]]s, arising at a fundamental level for the (analogue of) [[Poincaré duality]] in [[étale cohomology]]. The Euler products of the [[Hasse-WeilHasse–Weil zeta-function]] for an [[algebraic variety]] ''V'' over a number field ''K'', formed by reducing ''modulo'' [[prime ideal]]s to get local zeta-functions, are conjectured to have a ''global'' functional equation; but this is currently considered out of reach except in special cases. The definition can be read directly out of étale cohomology theory, again; but in general some assumption coming from [[automorphic representation]] theory seems required to get the functional equation. The [[Taniyama-ShimuraTaniyama–Shimura conjecture]] was a particular case of this as general theory. By relating the gamma-factor aspect to [[Hodge theory]], and detailed studies of the expected &epsilon;ε factor, the theory as empirical has been brought to quite a refined state, even if proofs are missing.
[[Category:Number theory]]
 
== See also ==
*[[Explicit formula (L-function)]]
*[[explicitRiemann–Siegel formula (L-function)]], [[(particular approximate functional equation]])
 
==References==
{{Reflist}}
 
== External links ==
*{{MathWorld|FunctionalEquation|Functional Equation}}
 
{{Authority control}}
 
{{DEFAULTSORT:Functional Equation (L-Function)}}
[[Category:Zeta and L-functions]]
[[Category:NumberFunctional theoryequations]]