Content deleted Content added
Roehl Sybing (talk | contribs) |
Gnomingstuff (talk | contribs) rv 2022 test edits |
||
| (26 intermediate revisions by 20 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=C|1=
{{WikiProject Education}}
{{WikiProject Linguistics|applied=yes}}
}}
==Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment==
[[File:Sciences humaines.svg|40px]] This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available [[Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/UNC_Chapel_Hill/Bilingualism_and_Second_Language_Acquisition_(Spring_2017)|on the course page]]. Student editor(s): [[User:C e jones|C e jones]], [[User:Mtsharpe|Mtsharpe]], [[User:Krismarl|Krismarl]], [[User:Abond77|Abond77]].
{{small|Above undated message substituted from [[Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment]] by [[User:PrimeBOT|PrimeBOT]] ([[User talk:PrimeBOT|talk]]) 18:10, 16 January 2022 (UTC)}}
It's great to have citation, but the first paragraph is dramatically uninformative. What do I care if a sequence of people attacked and defended CLT if I haven't the faintest clue what it is they said? [[User:76.6.173.2|76.6.173.2]] 13:05, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
How can we improve the page on Communicative language teaching?
I'm not sure 'context' and 'notion' are synonymous in the functional-notional tradition, as the article suggests. Something like 'shopping' was usually called a 'situation', not a 'notion'. 'Notion' was used to describe semantic domains, rather than places in the real world - for example 'weight', 'price', 'colour', 'texture'.
▲== Criticisms of CLT ==
== Criticisms of CLT ==
Recent critiques of CLT include an article by Stephen Bax entitled: "The end of CLT: a Context Approach to language teaching" in which he argues that the dominance of CLT has led to the neglect of one crucial aspect of language pedagogy, namely the context in which that pedagogy takes place. Bax argues that it is time to replace CLT as the central paradigm in language teaching with a Context Approach which places context at the heart of the profession. The article argues that such a shift is taking place already and will eventually change our practice radically.
Line 21 ⟶ 38:
What exactly is the "interesting response" by Harmer? Doesn't CLT address context in the classroom? What is this radical change that is not specified? Absent these answers, I don't believe this is a substantive criticism. [[User:Roehl Sybing|Roehl Sybing]] 17:40, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
A further search for this article reveals that the above summary is taken directly from the abstract of the article. Nothing particularly original here. [[User:Roehl Sybing|Roehl Sybing]] 17:49, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
I agree entirely that it's great to have a link to a critique of CLT but this article tells us nothing about what those critiques actually were/are. [[Special:Contributions/194.125.23.211|194.125.23.211]] ([[User talk:194.125.23.211|talk]]) 14:23, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
== picture ==
Line 29 ⟶ 51:
I think some examples of common activities would help
What kind of examples, lesson plans, samples of material or clearer description of how certain activities go?[[User:Ikwilhetweten|Ikwilhetweten]] 22:51, 27 October 2007 (UTC)
== References ==
there should be more about communicative methodology !! <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/62.248.92.198|62.248.92.198]] ([[User talk:62.248.92.198|talk]]) 13:30, 24 January 2010 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
==Wiki Education assignment: Content Area Literacy==
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment | course = Wikipedia:Wiki_Ed/University_of_Illinois_Springfield/Content_Area_Literacy_(Fall) | assignments = [[User:Sethmast|Sethmast]] | start_date = 2022-08-19 | end_date = 2022-12-03 }}
<span class="wikied-assignment" style="font-size:85%;">— Assignment last updated by [[User:Sethmast|Sethmast]] ([[User talk:Sethmast|talk]]) 03:40, 1 December 2022 (UTC)</span>
| |||