Content deleted Content added
m Reverted edits by 199.255.11.2 (talk): using Wikipedia for advertising/promotion (HG) (3.4.3) |
Citation bot (talk | contribs) Altered title. Added authors 1-1. | Use this bot. Report bugs. | Suggested by Dominic3203 | Category:Big data | #UCB_Category 6/64 |
||
(21 intermediate revisions by 12 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{short description|Aspect of computer science}}
{{cleanup reorganize|date=May 2017}}
'''Big
The goals of BDMMs are:
Key organizational areas refer to
The stages or phases in BDMMs depict the various ways in which data can be used in an organization and is one of the key tools to set direction and monitor the health of
An underlying assumption is that a high level of big data maturity correlates with an increase in revenue and reduction in operational expense. However, reaching the highest level of maturity involves major investments over many years.<ref name=":0">{{Cite journal|last=Halper|first=Fern|date=2016|title=A Guide to Achieving Big Data Analytics Maturity
== Categories
Big data maturity models can be broken down into three broad categories namely:<ref name=":1" />
== Descriptive
Descriptive models assess the current firm maturity through qualitative positioning of the firm in various stages or phases. The model does not provide any recommendations as to how a firm would improve their big data maturity.
=== Big data and analytics maturity model (IBM model) ===
This descriptive model aims to assess the value generated from big data investments towards supporting strategic business initiatives.
'''Maturity
The model consists of the following maturity levels:
* Ad-hoc
* Foundational
* Competitive
* Break
'''Assessment
Maturity levels also cover areas in matrix format focusing on:
Consisting of an assessment survey, this big data maturity model assesses an organization’s readiness to execute big data initiatives. Furthermore, the model aims to identify the steps and appropriate technologies that will lead an organization towards big data maturity.▼
=== Knowledgent big data maturity assessment ===
== Comparative Models ==▼
▲Consisting of an assessment survey, this big data maturity model assesses an
Comparative big data maturity models aim to benchmark an organization in relation to its industry peers and normally consist of a survey containing quantitative and qualitative information.
=== CSC big data maturity tool ===
The CSC
=== TDWI
The TDWI
'''Maturity
The different stages of maturity in the TDWI BDMM can be summarized as follows:
The nascent stage as a pre–big data environment. During this stage:
* The organization has a low awareness of big data or its value
* There is little to no executive support for the effort and only some people in the organization are interested in potential value of big data
* The
* An
During the pre-adoption stage:
* The organization start to investigate big data analytics
There is then generally a series of hurdles it needs to overcome. These hurdles include:
* Obtaining the right skill set to support the capability, including Hadoop and advanced analytical skills
* Political issues, i.e. big data projects are conducted in areas within the organization and trying to expand the effort or enforcing more stringent standards and governance lead to issues regarding ownership and control
The corporate adoption stage is characterized by the involvement of end-users, an organization gains further insight and the way of conducting business is transformed. During this stage:
* End-users might have started operationalizing big data analytics or changing their decision
* Most organizations would already have repeatedly addressed certain gaps in their infrastructure, data management, governance and analytics
Only a few organizations can be considered as visionary in terms of big data and big data analytics. During this stage an organization:
*
*
*
*
'''Research
TDWI<ref name=":0" /> did an assessment on 600 organizations and found that the majority of organizations are either in the
== Prescriptive
The majority of prescriptive BDMMs follow a similar modus operandi in that the current situation is first assessed followed by phases plotting the path towards increased big data maturity. Examples are
=== Info-tech big data maturity assessment tool ===
=== Info-Tech Big Data Maturity Assessment Tool <ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.infotech.com/research/ss/leverage-big-data-by-starting-small/it-big-data-maturity-assessment-tool|title=Big Data Maturity Assessment Tool|website=www.infotech.com|language=en|access-date=2017-05-21}}</ref> ===▼
This maturity model is prescriptive in the sense that the model consists of four distinct phases that each plot a path towards
* Phase 1,
* Phase 2,
* Phase 3,
* Phase 4,
▲
=== Radcliffe
The Radcliffe
* 0 – "In the
* 1 – "Catching up"
* 2 – "First
* 3 – "Tactical
* 4 – "Strategic
* 5 – "Optimize
<ref name=":3" />
=== Booz & Company's
This BDMM provides a framework that not only enables organizations to view the extent of their current maturity, but also to identify goals and opportunities for growth in big data maturity. The model consists of four stages namely,
* Stage 1: Performance
* Stage 2: Functional
* Stage 3: Value
* Stage 4: Business model transformation
<ref name=":2" />
=== Van Veenstra's model ===
=== Van Veenstra's Model <ref>{{Cite journal|last=van Veenstra|first=Anne Fleur|date=|title=Big Data in Small Steps: Assessing the value of data|url=http://www.idnext.eu/files/TNO-whitepaper--Big-data-in-small-steps.pdf|journal=White paper|volume=|pages=|via=}}</ref> ===▼
The prescriptive model proposed by Van Veenstra aims to firstly explore the existing big data environment of the organization followed by exploitation opportunities and a growth path towards big data maturity. The model makes use of four phases namely:
* Efficiency
* Effectiveness
* New
* Transformation
▲
== Critical
Current BDMMs have been evaluated under the following criteria:<ref name=":1" />
* Completeness of the model structure (completeness, consistency)
* The quality of model development and evaluation (trustworthiness, stability)
* Ease of application (ease of use, comprehensibility)
* Big
The TDWI and CSC have the strongest overall performance with steady scores in each of the criteria groups. The overall results communicate that the top performer models are extensive, balanced, well-documented, easy to use, and they address a good number of big data capabilities that are utilized in business value creation. The models of Booz & Company and Knowledgent are close seconds and these mid-performers address big data value creation in a commendable manner, but fall short when examining the completeness of the models and the ease of application. Knowledgent suffers from poor quality of development, having barely documented any of its development processes. The rest of the models, i.e. Infotech, Radcliffe, van Veenstra and IBM, have been categorized as low performers. Whilst their content is well aligned with business value creation through big data capabilities, they all lack quality of development, ease of application and extensiveness. Lowest scores were awarded to IBM and Van Veenstra, since both are providing low level guidance for the respective maturity
== See also ==
* [[Capability Maturity Model]]
|