Talk:Weather Research and Forecasting Model: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
recursive acronym: new section
Assessment: banner shell, Weather (Rater)
 
(14 intermediate revisions by 13 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|1=
{{meteorology|class=StubWikiProject Environment|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Climate change|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Weather|importance=Low|general-meteorology-task-force=yes}}
}}
 
== grid spacing ==
 
I have personal experience running WRF to a 500m grid... so, I'll go ahead and change that lower bound.--[[User:Squeakywaffle|Squeakywaffle]] ([[User talk:Squeakywaffle|talk]]) 02:53, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
 
after some more thought, I'm not going to change it, but I would propose this change:
 
The WRF is a [[mesoscale meteorology|mesoscale]] model that uses a grid spacing on the order of about 1-10 kilometers, with vertical grid spacing between 25 and 37 divisions. WRF is very computationally intensive, however, and running on small grid spacings can quickly become very expensive.--[[User:Squeakywaffle|Squeakywaffle]] ([[User talk:Squeakywaffle|talk]]) 02:57, 21 February 2009 (UTC)
 
== recursive acronym ==
 
The example listed - Advanced Research WRF (ARW) - is not technically a recursive acronym since "ARW" isn't one of the words in the acronym.. just thought I should point that out.
 
--[[Special:Contributions/173.68.117.70|173.68.117.70]] ([[User talk:173.68.117.70|talk]]) 07:06, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
 
==Software license==
What type of software license was this program released under? I don't see details about this in the article yet. [[User:Jarble|Jarble]] ([[User talk:Jarble|talk]]) 02:18, 18 March 2013 (UTC)