Collaborative method: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 01:25, 7 February 2014

Latest revision as of 01:00, 16 January 2025

(19 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown)

Line 1:

'''Collaborative methods''' are processes, behaviors, and conversations that relate to the [[collaboration]] between individuals.<ref name="spencelecture">Spence, Muneera U. ''"Graphic Design: Collaborative Processes = Understanding Self and Others."'' (lecture) Art 325: Collaborative Processes. Fairbanks Hall, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon. 13 Apr. 2006.</ref> These methods specifically aim to increase the success of [[team]]s as they engage in collaborative [[problem solving]]. Forms, rubrics, charts and graphs are useful in these situations to [[Objectivity (journalism)|objectively]] document [[Personality psychology|personal traits]] with the goal of improving performance in current and future projects.

{{howto|date=January 2013}}

*== [[General theoryHistory of collaboration]] ==

==Group Setup==

{{Main|Collaboration#History}}

==Group Setupsetup==

Deliberate setup of a team—before beginning work—increases the potential for high performance.{{citation needed|date=January 2013}} To do so, the following components of collaboration should be an initial focus:

==Group models==

Four group models are common in collaboration:<ref name="spencelecture">Spence, Muneera U. ''"Graphic Design: Collaborative Processes = Understanding Self and Others."'' (lecture) Art 325: Collaborative Processes. Fairbanks Hall, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon. 13 Apr. 2006.</ref>

;Chance

:''Collaboration by chance'' is the most basic model and underlies all four. The team is a random pick of whoever is available without any specific regard for the skills or needs of each member.

Line 59 ⟶ 62:

=== Acuity ===

[[ImageFile:Identifying-acuities.png|thumb|rightupright|A chart used to identify the acuities of people, particularly for use in assigning roles in collaboration.]]

{{main|Theory of multiple intelligences}}

Line 75 ⟶ 78:

=== Thinking styles ===

[[ImageFile:Evaluating-thinking-styles.png|thumb|rightupright|A chart used to evaluate the thinking style of persons, particularly for use in collaborative teams.]]

There are two main components of thinking styles: internal and external,{{citation needed|date=January 2013}} they share similarities to the [[extraversion and introversion]] traits seen in human [[Personality psychology|personalities]]. The two thinking styles are dichotomies and can be used as axes when charting personal evaluation; note that "there is no 'right' place on the grid." <ref name="spencelecture" />

==== Creation of ideas ====

Line 92 ⟶ 95:

=== Learning styles ===

[[ImageFile:Evaluating-learning-styles.png|thumb|rightupright|A chart used to identify the learning styles of people, particularly for use in analyzing communication needs in collaboration.]]

{{main|Representational systems (NLP)}}

Line 165 ⟶ 168:

==== Voting ====

[[ImageFile:Collaborative-looping-exercise-and-voting.jpg|thumb|right|Collaborative writing exercises ("clustering" is shown here) can be used for development of ideas. Colored tabs of paper—attached to the large page—are used in a collaborative voting exercise to gain consensus.]]

[[Opinion poll|Polling the opinions]] of all group members is necessary to equalize ownership of the collaborative project.{{citation needed|date=January 2013}} There are two principal ways to do this through [[voting]]:

Line 179 ⟶ 182:

=== Performance analysis ===

[[ImageFile:Measuring performance.png|thumb|rightupright|A chart to measure the performance of a group]]

In Katzenbach and Smith's research, five team classifications have been established:<ref name="katzenbachandsmith" />

Line 193 ⟶ 196:

A main barrier to collaboration may be the difficulty in achieving agreement when diverse viewpoints exist.{{citation needed|date=January 2013}} This can make effective decision-making more difficult. Even if collaboration members do manage to agree they are very likely to be agreeing from a different perspective. This is often called a cultural boundary. For example:

* A culture where rank or job title is important makes it hard for a lower rank person, who may be more qualified than their superior for the job it had, to collaborate. The lower rank person is told what to do. This is not collaboration

* "[[stranger danger]]"; which can be expressed as a reluctance to share with others unknown to you

* "needle in a haystack"; people believe that others may have already solved your problem but how do you find them

Line 200 ⟶ 203:

== Group conclusion ==

[[ImageFile:Evaluating-communication.png|thumb|rightupright|A chart to evaluate four aspects of communication materials.]]

When a group has completed their objectives, introspection and self-critique are necessary to provide growth from the collaborative work experience. This stage also can be used to identify further work to be performed. Documentation of previous group actions become particularly useful at this stage. Spence recommends<ref name="spencelecture" /> that to evaluate collaborative output, individuals must "attack projects, not people." Using the values and goals agreed upon in the 'setup' phase allows group members to make objective, authoritative critique of performance.

Line 207 ⟶ 210:

== See also ==

{{div col|colwidth=22em}}

<div style="font-size:100%; -moz-column-count:2; column-count:2;">

* [[Appreciative inquiry]]

* [[Attitude (psychology)]]

Line 214 ⟶ 217:

* [[Devil's advocate]]

* [[Game theory]]

* [[General theory of collaboration]]

* [[Group dynamics]]

* [[Polytely]]

Line 227 ⟶ 229:

* [[Social psychology]]

* [[Sociomapping]]

{{div col end}}

</div>

== References ==

Line 233 ⟶ 235:

== Further reading ==

* Bennis, Warren, and Patricia W. Biederman. ''Organizing Genius.'' Cambridge, MAMassachusetts: Perseus, 1997.

* Marcum, James W. ''After the Information Age: A Dynamic Learning Manifesto.'' Vol. 231. Counterpoints: Studies in the Postmodern Theory of Education. New York, NY: Peter Lang, 2006.

* Spence, Muneera U. ''"Graphic Design Collaborative Processes: a Course in Collaboration."'' Oregon State University. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: AIGA, 2005. https://web.archive.org/web/20080410234154/http://revolutionphiladelphia.aiga.org/resources/content/2/5/7/0/documents/MSpence.pdf

{{Management}}

[[Category:Collaboration]]

[[Category:Decision theory]]

[[Category:Group processes]]