Linear system of divisors: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary
 
(48 intermediate revisions by 25 users not shown)
Line 1:
{{Short description|Concept in algebraic geometry}}
{{redirect-distinguish2|Kodaira map|[[Kodaira–Spencer map]] from cohomology theory}}
[[File:Apollonian circles.svg|thumb|A '''linear system of divisors''' algebraicizes the classic geometric notion of a [[family of curves]], as in the [[Apollonian circles]].]]
In [[algebraic geometry]], a '''linear system of divisors''' is an algebraic generalization of the geometric notion of a [[family of curves]]; the dimension of the linear system corresponds to the number of parameters of the family.
 
These arose first in the form of a ''linear system'' of [[algebraic curve]]s in the [[projective plane]]. It assumed a more general form, through gradual generalisation, so that one could speak of '''linear equivalence''' of [[divisor (algebraic geometry)|divisor]]s ''D'' on a general [[Scheme (mathematics)|scheme]] or even a [[ringed space]] <math>(''X'', '' \mathcal{O''<sub>''X''}_X)</submath>).<ref>[[Alexander Grothendieck|Grothendieck, Alexandre]]; Dieudonné, Jean. ''EGA IV'', 21.3.</ref>
 
ALinear linear systemsystems of dimension 1, 2, or 3 isare called a '''[[Pencil (mathematics)|pencil]]''', a '''net''', or a '''web''', respectively.
 
A map determined by a linear system is sometimes called the '''Kodaira map'''.
 
==DefinitionDefinitions ==
Given a general variety <math>X</math>, two divisors <math>D,E \in \text{Div}(X)</math> are '''linearly equivalent''' if
Given the fundamental idea of a [[rational function]] on a general variety ''V'', or in other words of a function ''f'' in the [[Function field of an algebraic variety|function field]] of ''V'',
divisors D and E are ''linearly equivalent'' if
 
:<math>DE = ED + (f)\ </math>
 
wherefor some non-zero [[rational function]] <math>f</math> on <math>X</math>, or in other words a non-zero element <math>f</math> of the [[Function field of an algebraic variety|function field]] <math>k(X)</math>. Here <math>(''f'')</math> denotes the divisor of zeroes and poles of the function ''<math>f''</math>.
 
Note that if ''V''<math>X</math> has [[Mathematical singularity|singular points]], the notion of 'divisor' is inherently ambiguous ([[Cartier divisor]]s, [[Weil divisor]]s: see [[divisor (algebraic geometry)]]). The definition in that case is usually said with greater care (using [[invertible sheaves]] or [[holomorphic line bundle]]s); see below.
 
A '''complete linear system on ''V'' on <math>X</math> is defined as the set of all effective divisors linearly equivalent to some given divisor ''<math>D'' \in \text{Div}(X)</math>. It is denoted <math>|''D''|</math>. Let ''<math>\mathcal{L''(''D'')}</math> be the line bundle associated to ''<math>D''</math>. In the case that ''V''<math>X</math> is a nonsingular projective variety, the set <math>|''D''|</math> is in natural bijection with <math> (\Gamma(VX,\mathcal{L}) \smallsetminus \{0\})/k^\ast, </math> <ref name=":0">Hartshorne, R. 'Algebraic Geometry', proposition II.7.2, page 151, proposition II.7.7, page 157, page 158, exercise IV.1.7, page 298, proposition IV.5.3, page 342</ref> by associating the element <math>E = D + (f)</math> of <math>|D|</math> to the set of non-zero multiples of <math>f</math> (this is well defined since two non-zero rational functions have the same divisor if and only if they are non-zero multiples of each other). A complete linear system <math>|D|</math> is therefore a projective space.
 
A '''linear system''' <math> \mathfrak{d} </math> is then a projective subspace of a complete linear system, so it corresponds to a vector subspace ''W'' of <math> \Gamma(VX,\mathcal{L}). </math> The dimension of the linear system <math> \mathfrak{d} </math> is its dimension as a projective space. Hence <math> \dim \mathfrak{d} = \dim W - 1 </math>.
 
Since a Cartier divisor class is an isomorphism class of a line bundle, linearLinear systems can also be introduced by means of the [[line bundle]] or [[invertible sheaf]] language, without reference to divisors at all. In those terms, divisors ''<math>D''</math> ([[Cartier divisor]]s, to be precise) correspond to line bundles, and '''linear equivalence''' of two divisors means that the corresponding line bundles are isomorphic.
 
== See alsoExamples ==
==Linear systems of hypersurfaces in <math>\mathbb{P}^n</math>==
Consider the line bundle <math>\mathcal{O}(d)</math> over <math>\mathbb{P}^n</math>. If we take global sections <math>V = \Gamma(\mathcal{O}(d))</math>, then we can take its projectivization <math>\mathbb{P}(V)</math>. This is isomorphic to <math>\mathbb{P}^N</math> where
:<math>N = \binom{n+d}{n} - 1</math>
Then, using any embedding <math>\mathbb{P}^k \to \mathbb{P}^N</math> we can construct a linear system of dimension <math>k</math>.
 
=== Linear equivalence ===
==Linear system of conics==
Consider the line bundle <math>\mathcal{O}(2)</math> on <math>\mathbb{P}^3</math> whose sections <math>s \in \Gamma(\mathbb{P}^3,\mathcal{O}(2))</math> define [[quadric surface]]s. For the associated divisor <math>D_s = Z(s)</math>, it is linearly equivalent to any other divisor defined by the vanishing locus of some <math>t \in \Gamma(\mathbb{P}^3,\mathcal{O}(2)) </math> using the rational function <math>\left(t/s\right)</math><ref name=":0" /> (Proposition 7.2). For example, the divisor <math>D</math> associated to the vanishing locus of <math>x^2 + y^2 + z^2 + w^2</math> is linearly equivalent to the divisor <math>E</math> associated to the vanishing locus of <math>xy</math>. Then, there is the equivalence of divisors<blockquote><math>D = E + \left( \frac{x^2 + y^2 + z^2 + w^2}{xy} \right)</math></blockquote>
For example, the [[conic section]]s in the projective plane form a linear system of dimension five, as one sees by counting the constants in the degree two [[equation]]s. The condition to pass through a given point ''P'' imposes a single linear condition, so that [[conic]]s ''C'' through ''P'' form a linear system of dimension 4. Other types of condition that are of interest include tangency to a given line&nbsp;''L''.
 
=== Linear systems on curves ===
In the most elementary treatments a linear system appears in the form of equations
One of the important complete linear systems on an algebraic curve <math>C</math> of [[Genus (mathematics)|genus]] <math>g</math> is given by the complete linear system associated with the canonical divisor <math>K</math>, denoted <math>|K| = \mathbb{P}(H^0(C,\omega_C))</math>. This definition follows from proposition II.7.7 of Hartshorne<ref name=":0" /> since every effective divisor in the linear system comes from the zeros of some section of <math>\omega_C</math>.
 
==== Hyperelliptic curves ====
:<math>\lambda C + \mu C' = 0\ </math>
One application of linear systems is used in the classification of algebraic curves. A [[hyperelliptic curve]] is a curve <math>C</math> with a [[Degree of a finite morphism|degree <math>2</math> morphism]] <math>f:C \to \mathbb{P}^1</math>.<ref name=":0" /> For the case <math>g=2</math> all curves are hyperelliptic: the [[Riemann–Roch theorem]] then gives the degree of <math>K_C</math> is <math>2g - 2 = 2</math> and <math>h^0(K_C) = 2</math>, hence there is a degree <math>2</math> map to <math>\mathbb{P}^1 = \mathbb{P}(H^0(C,\omega_C))</math>.
 
==== g<sub>d</sub><sup>r</sup> ====
with λ and μ unknown scalars, not both zero. Here ''C'' and ''C&prime;'' are given conics. Abstractly we can say that this is a [[projective line]] in the space of all conics, on which we take
A <math>g^r_d</math> is a linear system <math> \mathfrak{d} </math> on a curve <math>C</math> which is of degree <math>d</math> and dimension <math>r</math>. For example, hyperelliptic curves have a <math>g^1_2</math> which is induced by the <math>2:1</math>-map <math>C \to \mathbb P^1</math>. In fact, hyperelliptic curves have a unique <math>g^1_2</math><ref name=":0" /> from proposition 5.3. Another close set of examples are curves with a <math>g_1^3</math> which are called [[Trigonal curve|trigonal curves]]. In fact, any curve has a <math>g^d_1</math> for <math>d \geq (1/2)g + 1</math>.<ref>{{Cite journal|last1=Kleiman|first1=Steven L.|last2=Laksov|first2=Dan|date=1974|title=Another proof of the existence of special divisors|url=https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.acta/1485889804|journal=Acta Mathematica|language=EN|volume=132|pages=163–176|doi=10.1007/BF02392112|issn=0001-5962|doi-access=free}}</ref>
 
===Linear systems of hypersurfaces in <math>\mathbb{P}^n</math>a projective space===
:<math>[\lambda : \mu]\ </math>
Consider the line bundle <math>\mathcal{O}(d)</math> over <math>\mathbb{P}^n</math>. If we take global sections <math>V = \Gamma(\mathcal{O}(d))</math>, then we can take its projectivization <math>\mathbb{P}(V)</math>. This is isomorphic to <math>\mathbb{P}^N</math> where
 
:<math>N = \binom{n+d}{n} - 1</math>
as [[homogeneous coordinates]]. Geometrically we notice that any point ''Q'' common to ''C'' and ''C&prime;'' is also on each of the conics of the linear system. According to [[Bézout's theorem]] ''C'' and ''C&prime;'' will intersect in four points (if counted correctly). Assuming these are in [[general position]], i.e. four distinct intersections, we get another interpretation of the linear system as the conics passing through the four given points (note that the [[codimension]] four here matches the dimension, one, in the five-dimensional space of conics). Note that of these conics, exactly three are [[degenerate conic|degenerate]], each consisting of a pair of lines, corresponding to the <math>\textstyle{\binom{4}{2,2}/2=3}</math> ways of choosing 2 pairs of points from 4 points (counting via the [[multinomial coefficient]], and accounting for the overcount by a factor of 2 that <math>\textstyle{\binom{4}{2}}</math> makes when interested in counting ''pairs of pairs'' rather than just selections of size 2).
 
Then, using any embedding <math>\mathbb{P}^k \to \mathbb{P}^N</math> we can construct a linear system of dimension <math>k</math>.
=== Applications ===
A striking application of such a family is in {{Harv|Faucette|1996}} which gives a [[Quartic formula#Solving with algebraic geometry|geometric solution to a quartic equation]] by considering the pencil of conics through the four roots of the quartic, and identifying the three degenerate conics with the three roots of the [[resolvent cubic]].
 
===Linear Examplesystem of conics===
=={{main|Linear system of conics==}}
{{external media | video1 = [http://users.ipfw.edu/CoffmanA/pov/conic1.gif Type I] linear system, {{Harv|Coffman}}.}}
 
For example, given the four points <math>(\pm 1, \pm 1),</math> the pencil of conics through them can be parameterized as <math>ax^2+(1-a)y^2=1,</math> which are the [[affine combination]]s of the equations <math>x^2=1</math> and <math>y^2=1,</math> corresponding to the parallel vertical lines and horizontal lines; this yields degenerate conics at the standard points of <math>0,1,\infty.</math> A less elegant but more symmetric parametrization is given by <math>(1+a)x^2+(1-a)y^2=2,</math> in which case inverting ''a'' (<math>a \mapsto -a </math>) interchanges ''x'' and ''y'', yielding the following pencil; in all cases the center is at the origin:
===Characteristic linear system of a family of curves===
* <math>a>1:</math> hyperbolae opening left and right;
The characteristic linear system of a family of curves on an algebraic surface ''Y'' for a curve ''C'' in the family is a linear system formed by the curves in the family that are infinitely near ''C''.<ref>{{cite book |last1=Arbarello |first1=Enrico |author1-link=Enrico Arbarello |last2=Cornalba |first2=Maurizio |last3=Griffiths |first3=Phillip |author3-link=Phillip Griffiths |title=Geometry of algebraic curves |volume=II, with a contribution by Joseph Daniel Harris |series=Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften |issue=268 |publisher=Springer |___location=Heidelberg |year=2011 |mr=2807457 |doi=10.1007/978-1-4757-5323-3 |page=3|isbn=978-1-4419-2825-2 }}</ref>
* <math>a=1:</math> the parallel vertical lines <math>x=-1, x=1;</math>
:(intersection point at [1:0:0])
* <math>0 < a < 1:</math> ellipses with a vertical major axis;
* <math>a=0:</math> a circle (with radius <math>\sqrt{2}</math>);
* <math>-1 < a < 0:</math> ellipses with a horizontal major axis;
* <math>a=-1:</math> the parallel horizontal lines <math>y=-1, y=1;</math>
:(intersection point at [0:1:0])
* <math>a<-1:</math> hyperbolae opening up and down,
* <math>a=\infty:</math> the diagonal lines <math>y=x, y=-x;</math>
:(dividing by <math>a</math> and taking the limit as <math>a \to \infty</math> yields <math>x^2-y^2=0</math>)
:(intersection point at [0:0:1])
* This then loops around to <math>a>1,</math> since pencils are a ''projective'' line.
In the terminology of {{Harv|Levy|1964}}, this is a Type I linear system of conics, and is animated in the linked video.
 
In modern terms, it is a subsystem of the linear system associated to the [[normal bundle]] to <math>C \hookrightarrow Y</math>. Note a characteristic system need not to be complete; in fact, the question of completeness is something studied extensively by the Italian school without a satisfactory conclusion; nowadays, the [[Kodaira–Spencer theory]] can be used to answer the question of the completeness.
=== Classification ===
There are 8 types of linear systems of conics over the complex numbers, depending on intersection multiplicity at the base points, which divide into 13 types over the real numbers, depending on whether the base points are real or imaginary; this is discussed in {{Harv|Levy|1964}} and illustrated in {{Harv|Coffman}}.
 
=== Other examples ===
The [[Cayley–Bacharach theorem]] is a property of a pencil of cubics, which states that the base locus satisfies an "8 implies 9" property: any cubic containing 8 of the points necessarily contains the 9th.
 
Line 73 ⟶ 61:
In general linear systems became a basic tool of [[birational geometry]] as practised by the [[Italian school of algebraic geometry]]. The technical demands became quite stringent; later developments clarified a number of issues. The computation of the relevant dimensions &mdash; the Riemann–Roch problem as it can be called &mdash; can be better phrased in terms of [[homological algebra]]. The effect of working on varieties with [[Mathematical singularity|singular points]] is to show up a difference between [[Weil divisor]]s (in the [[free abelian group]] generated by codimension-one subvarieties), and [[Cartier divisor]]s coming from sections of [[invertible sheaves]].
 
The Italian school liked to reduce the geometry on an [[algebraic surface]] to that of linear systems cut out by surfaces in three-space; [[Zariski]] wrote his celebrated book ''Algebraic Surfaces'' to try to pull together the methods, involving ''linear systems with fixed base points''. There was a controversy, one of the final issues in the conflict between 'old' and 'new' points of view in algebraic geometry, over [[Henri Poincaré]]'s [[characteristic linear system of an algebraic family of curves]] on an algebraic surface.
 
== Base locus ==
Line 91 ⟶ 79:
 
{{See also|Theorem of Bertini}}
 
=== Example ===
Consider the [[Lefschetz pencil]] <math>p:\mathfrak{X} \to \mathbb{P}^1</math> given by two generic sections <math>f,g \in \Gamma(\mathbb{P}^n,\mathcal{O}(d))</math>, so <math>\mathfrak{X}</math> given by the scheme<blockquote><math>\mathfrak{X} =\text{Proj}\left( \frac{k[s,t][x_0,\ldots,x_n]}{(sf + tg)} \right)</math></blockquote>This has an associated linear system of divisors since each polynomial, <math>s_0f + t_0g</math> for a fixed <math>[s_0:t_0] \in \mathbb{P}^1</math> is a divisor in <math>\mathbb{P}^n</math>. Then, the base locus of this system of divisors is the scheme given by the vanishing locus of <math>f,g</math>, so<blockquote><math>\text{Bl}(\mathfrak{X}) = \text{Proj}\left(
\frac{
k[s,t][x_0,\ldots,x_n]
}{
(f,g)
}
\right)</math></blockquote>
 
== A map determined by a linear system ==
<!-- the below is a coordinate-free approach; while useful and important in application, we should also give a less abstract construction as well. -->
Each linear system on an algebraic variety determines a morphism from the complement of the base locus to a projective space of dimension of the system, as follows. (In a sense, the converse is also true; thissee willthe be discussed in thesection future.below)
 
Let ''L'' be a line bundle on an algebraic variety ''X'' and <math>V \subset \Gamma(X, L)</math> a finite-dimensional vector subspace. For the sake of clarity, we first consider the case when ''V'' is base-point-free; in other words, the natural map <math>V \otimes_k \mathcal{O}_X \to L</math> is surjective (here, ''k'' = the base field). Or equivalently, <math>\operatorname{Sym}((V \otimes_k \mathcal{O}_X) \otimes_{\mathcal{O}_X} L^{-1}) \to \bigoplus_{n=0}^{\infty} \mathcal{O}_X</math> is surjective. Hence, writing <math>V_X = V \times X</math> for the trivial vector bundle and passing the surjection to the [[relative Proj]], there is a [[closed immersion]]:
:<math>i: X \hookrightarrow \mathbb{P}(V_X^* \otimes L) \simeq \mathbb{P}(V_X^*) = \mathbb{P}(V^*) \times X</math>
where <math>\simeq</math> on the right is the invariance of the [[projective bundle]] under a twist by a line bundle. Following ''i'' by a projection, there results in the map:<ref>{{harvnbcite book|last = Fulton|locfirst = William|title = Intersection Theory|chapter = § 4.4. Linear Systems |doi = 10.1007/978-1-4612-1700-8_5 |publisher = Springer|year = 1998}}</ref>
:<math>f: X \to \mathbb{P}(V^*).</math>
 
When the base locus of ''V'' is not empty, the above discussion still goes through with <math>\mathcal{O}_X</math> in the direct sum replaced by an [[ideal sheaf]] defining the base locus and ''X'' replaced by the [[blowing up|blow-up]] <math>\widetilde{X}</math> of it along the (scheme-theoretic) base locus ''B''. Precisely, as above, there is a surjection <math>\operatorname{Sym}((V \otimes_k \mathcal{O}_X) \otimes_{\mathcal{O}_X} L^{-1}) \to \bigoplus_{n=0}^{\infty} \mathcal{I}^n</math> where <math>\mathcal{I}</math> is the ideal sheaf of ''B'' and that gives rise to
:<math>i: \widetilde{X} \hookrightarrow \mathbb{P}(V^*) \times X.</math>
Since <math>X - B \simeq</math> an open subset of <math>\widetilde{X}</math>, there results in the map:
Line 107 ⟶ 104:
 
Finally, when a basis of ''V'' is chosen, the above discussion becomes more down-to-earth (and that is the style used in Hartshorne, Algebraic Geometry).<!-- and we should give that version here as well. -->
 
== Linear system determined by a map to a projective space ==
{{expand section|date=August 2019}}
Each morphism from an algebraic variety to a projective space determines a base-point-free linear system on the variety; because of this, a base-point-free linear system and a map to a projective space are often used interchangeably.
 
For a closed immersion <math>f: Y \hookrightarrow X</math> of algebraic varieties there is a pullback of a linear system <math>\mathfrak{d}</math> on <math>X</math> to <math>Y</math>, defined as <math>f^{-1}(\mathfrak{d}) = \{ f^{-1}(D) | D \in \mathfrak{d} \}</math><ref name=":0" /> (page 158).
 
=== O(1) on a projective variety ===
A projective variety <math>X</math> embedded in <math>\mathbb{P}^r</math> has a natural linear system determining a map to projective space from <math>\mathcal{O}_X(1) = \mathcal{O}_X \otimes_{\mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^r}} \mathcal{O}_{\mathbb{P}^r}(1)</math>. This sends a point <math>x \in X</math> to its corresponding point <math>[x_0:\cdots:x_r] \in \mathbb{P}^r </math>.
 
== See also ==
 
* [[Brill–Noether theory]]
*[[Lefschetz pencil]]
*[[bundle of principal parts]]
 
==References==
{{reflist}}
{{refbegin}}
* {{ Citation | first = Adam | last = Coffman | url = http://users.ipfw.edu/CoffmanA/pov/lsoc.html | title = Linear Systems of Conics }}
* {{ Citation | title = A Geometric Interpretation of the Solution of the General Quartic Polynomial | first = William Mark | last = Faucette | journal = [[The American Mathematical Monthly]] | volume = 103 | number = 1 |date=January 1996 | pages = 51–57 | citeseerx = 10.1.1.111.5574 | jstor=2975214 }}
* {{cite book | author=P. Griffiths | authorlink=Phillip Griffiths |author2=J. Harris |authorlink2=Joe Harris (mathematician) | title=Principles of Algebraic Geometry | series=Wiley Classics Library | publisher=Wiley Interscience | year=1994 | isbn=0-471-05059-8 | page=137 }}
* [[Robin Hartshorne|Hartshorne, R.]], ''Algebraic Geometry'', [[Springer-Verlag]], 1977; corrected 6th printing, 1993. {{isbn|0-387-90244-9}}.
* [[Robert Lazarsfeld|Lazarsfeld, R.]], ''Positivity in Algebraic Geometry I'', Springer-Verlag, 2004. {{isbn|3-540-22533-1}}.
* {{ Citation | last = Levy | first = Harry | title = Projective and related geometries | publisher = The Macmillan Co. | ___location = New York | year = 1964 | pages = x+405 }}
* Lazarsfeld, R., ''Positivity in Algebraic Geometry I'', Springer-Verlag, 2004. {{isbn|3-540-22533-1}}.
{{refend}}
 
== See also ==
*[[bundle of principal parts]]
 
[[Category:Geometry of divisors]]