Talk:Transitional fossil: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 21:19, 9 May 2012

Latest revision as of 02:41, 1 February 2025

(46 intermediate revisions by 15 users not shown)

Line 1:

{{afd-merged-from|List of transitional fossils|List of transitional fossils|10 January 2023}}

{{User:MiszaBot/config

{{Skip to talk}}

|archiveheader = {{aan}}

{{British English}}

|maxarchivesize = 100K

|counter = 3

|minthreadsleft = 5

|algo = old(120d)

|archive = Talk:Transitional fossil/Archive %(counter)d

}}

{{ArticleHistory

|action1=PR

Line 23 ⟶ 18:

|topic=natsci

}}

{{WikiProject banner shell|class=GA|vital=yes|1=

{{British English}}

{{WikiProject Palaeontology|importance=Top|auto=yes}}

{{WikiProjectBannerShell|collapsed=no|1=

{{WikiProject Palaeontology|class=GAEvolutionary biology|importance=Top|auto=yestop}}

{{WikiProject Evolutionary biology|class=GAGeology|importance=tophigh}}

{{WikiProject Biology|class=GA|importance=high}}

{{WikiProject Animals|class=GA|importance=Tophigh}}

{{WikiProject Tree of Life|class=GA|importance=Tophigh}}

{{WikiProject Fishes|class=GA|importance=mid}}

{{WikiProject Dinosaurs|class=GA|importance=mid}}

{{WikiProject Cetaceans|class=GA|importance=mid}}

{{WikiProject Primates|class=GA|importance=mid}}

{{WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles|class=GA|importance=mid}}

{{GOCEWikiProject Guild of Copy Editors|user=Stfg|date=22 February 2012}}

}}

{{GOCE|user=Stfg|date=22 February 2012}}

{{archive box |search=yes |bot=MiszaBot I |age=4 |units=months |index=/Archive index |

* [[/Archive 1|2005 - 2007]]

Line 46 ⟶ 41:

|target=/Archive index |mask=/Archive <#> |leading_zeros=0 |indexhere=yes

}}

{{User:MiszaBot/config

|archiveheader = {{aan}}

|maxarchivesize = 100K

|counter = 3

|minthreadsleft = 5

|algo = old(120d)

|archive = Talk:Transitional fossil/Archive %(counter)d

}}

{{Broken anchors|links=

* <nowiki>[[Phylum#Land plant phyla (divisions)|divisions]]</nowiki> The anchor (#Land plant phyla (divisions)) is no longer available because it was [[Special:Diff/757379811|deleted by a user]] before. <!-- {"title":"Land plant phyla (divisions)","appear":{"revid":651098800,"parentid":651098704,"timestamp":"2015-03-12T20:38:26Z","replaced_anchors":{"Land plant divisions":"Land plant phyla (divisions)"},"removed_section_titles":["Land plant divisions"],"added_section_titles":["Land plant phyla (divisions)"]},"disappear":{"revid":757379811,"parentid":757368286,"timestamp":"2016-12-30T09:46:38Z","replaced_anchors":{"Land plant phyla (divisions)":"Plant phyla (divisions)"},"removed_section_titles":["Land plant phyla (divisions)"],"added_section_titles":["Plant phyla (divisions)","CITEREFCavalier-Smith2004"]},"very_different":false,"rename_to":"Plant phyla (divisions)"} -->

}}

{{Talk:Transitional fossil/GA1}}

== Article feedback ==

== "By august command" Section ==

How does one add the Feedback tool to an article? That would be very useful and would show us areas that this article can improve. --[[User:Harizotoh9|Harizotoh9]] ([[User talk:Harizotoh9|talk]]) 15:52, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

Added the feedback option. Haven't gotten any yet. --[[User:Harizotoh9|Harizotoh9]] ([[User talk:Harizotoh9|talk]]) 08:52, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

== Reader feedback on Missing links: ==

"Whoever wrote this seems to be confused regarding what constitutes the term "missing link". I was referring to a post-Darwinian use of the term whereby modern humans are directly connected to a specific line of hominid. Though his (her) explanation of Java man is acceptable, and is definitely not missing, the inference that future discoveries will somehow fill in does infer that for now they are indeed missing."

::What It'sare fineyour as it is.thoughts? --[[User:Chiswick ChapHarizotoh9|Chiswick ChapHarizotoh9]] ([[User talk:Chiswick ChapHarizotoh9|talk]]) 1602:3859, 93 MayNovember 2012 (UTC)

:The commenter seem to have missed the references for the term having several meanings. The article has an example of the term used by a modern researcher (Benton) using it for a non-humanoid fossil, the ''Archaeopteryx''. Perhaps we need to make this more clear? [[User:Petter Bøckman|Petter Bøckman]] ([[User talk:Petter Bøckman|talk]]) 08:03, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

== Vestigial organs ==

Should this fit into the article in any way?

::Vestigial organs are common in whales (legs),[25] flightless birds (wings), snakes (pelvis and lung), and numerous structures in humans (the coccyx, plica semilunaris, and appendix).

--[[User:Harizotoh9|Harizotoh9]] ([[User talk:Harizotoh9|talk]]) 21:32, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

== FA status and other improvements ==

What would be needed to bring the article to FA status?

What areas do you think need expanding?

--[[User:Harizotoh9|Harizotoh9]] ([[User talk:Harizotoh9|talk]]) 05:50, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

== Platypus ==

That last IP edit reminded me. A section on the Platypus and other animals like that could be interesting. It would go under "Misunderstandings". --[[User:Harizotoh9|Harizotoh9]] ([[User talk:Harizotoh9|talk]]) 02:38, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

:: Mm, yes. Love the mammal evolving into a duck, or was it the other way round. It will be a controversial section that could create quite a challenge for FA; finding reliable, undisputed sources for it might be .. interesting. [[User:Chiswick Chap|Chiswick Chap]] ([[User talk:Chiswick Chap|talk]]) 07:53, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

== Strange content in "missing link" section ==

The section "missing link" (in the [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Transitional_fossil&oldid=992508500#Missing_links as-of-writing current revision] does not make sense to me. The sources do support the claim that modern use of the term can be emphasized unduly, or lead to lopsided understanding of human evolution; they does not support a characterization of transitional fossils being a "misconception", or the implication that people looking for transitional fossils were operating under false premises (in fact, just the opposite -- the section details numerous discoveries, like the [[Java Man]], which identified the missing links which had been unknown at the time). I am going to copyedit the section. '''[[User:JPxG|jp]]'''×'''[[User talk:JPxG|g]]''' 01:56, 11 December 2020 (UTC)

I have a preference against quotes being used for section headings. However, I've tried but I can't think of a better title to use for that section. Any suggestions? --[[User:Harizotoh9|Harizotoh9]] ([[User talk:Harizotoh9|talk]]) 16:15, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

:: It's fine as it is. [[User:Chiswick Chap|Chiswick Chap]] ([[User talk:Chiswick Chap|talk]]) 16:38, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

:::The first link? Strange monster? Darwins monster? The bird from Solenhofen? Feathers and teeth? The reptile-bird? [[User:Petter Bøckman|Petter Bøckman]] ([[User talk:Petter Bøckman|talk]]) 17:46, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

::::I like the quote. If it's too whimsical, just "Solenhofen" might do. More explicitly: "Link between birds and reptiles" or "Bird–reptile link" (N.B. that's an ndash). No monsters please! Note that we don't begin section titles with the definite article. --[[User:Stfg|Stfg]] ([[User talk:Stfg|talk]]) 20:49, 9 May 2012 (UTC)