Content deleted Content added
Sennecaster (talk | contribs) Adding content attribution notices. (Deputy v0.5.1) |
Tom.Reding (talk | contribs) m -redundant class param |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{Talk header}}
{{WikiProject banner shell|1=▼
{{WikiProject Disambiguation}}▼
{{WikiProject Graphic design |attention=yes|class=dab}}▼
▲}}{{Backwards copy
| title2 = Copy of SAS# 5 - ART 002 - Lecture notes 1
| comments = Oldest archive goes to September 2020, article is long-standing before
Line 14 ⟶ 10:
}}
{{American English}}
}}
{{User:MiszaBot/config
| algo = old(30d)
Line 28:
Consistency of elements allows the reader/user to relate the element(s) in their rightful hierarchy to each other throughout the experience/interaction within the different mediums of the object.
== Contested deletion ==
Line 40 ⟶ 34:
:Can you show to the contrary? [[User:Dawkin Verbier|Dawkin Verbier]] ([[User talk:Dawkin Verbier|talk]]) 06:18, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
== Re-splitting ==
I split the article into [[Design elements]] and [[Design principles]] before both pages were flagged as copyvio and deleted. I now see that the copyvio investigation has concluded, and that the external pages had copied this page, rather than the other way round. I am wondering now how and whether it would be appropriate to re-split the article? [[User:Dawkin Verbier|Dawkin Verbier]] ([[User talk:Dawkin Verbier|talk]]) 04:31, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
:If you want to split articles you'd need to formally make a proposal. See [[Talk:Democratic_Labor_Party_(historical)#Split:_To_Democratic_Labour_Party_(Australia,_1980)]] as an example. ''[[User:TarnishedPath|<b style="color:#ff0000;">Tar</b><b style="color:#ff7070;">nis</b><b style="color:#ffa0a0;">hed</b><b style="color:#420000;">Path</b>]]''<sup>[[User talk:TarnishedPath|<b style="color:#bd4004;">talk</b>]]</sup> 10:47, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
|