Content deleted Content added
→Re-splitting: new section |
Tom.Reding (talk | contribs) m -redundant class param |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 10:
}}
{{American English}}
{{WikiProject banner shell
{{WikiProject Visual arts}}
{{WikiProject Graphic design |attention=yes}}
Line 28:
Consistency of elements allows the reader/user to relate the element(s) in their rightful hierarchy to each other throughout the experience/interaction within the different mediums of the object.
== Contested deletion ==
Line 44 ⟶ 38:
I split the article into [[Design elements]] and [[Design principles]] before both pages were flagged as copyvio and deleted. I now see that the copyvio investigation has concluded, and that the external pages had copied this page, rather than the other way round. I am wondering now how and whether it would be appropriate to re-split the article? [[User:Dawkin Verbier|Dawkin Verbier]] ([[User talk:Dawkin Verbier|talk]]) 04:31, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
:If you want to split articles you'd need to formally make a proposal. See [[Talk:Democratic_Labor_Party_(historical)#Split:_To_Democratic_Labour_Party_(Australia,_1980)]] as an example. ''[[User:TarnishedPath|<b style="color:#ff0000;">Tar</b><b style="color:#ff7070;">nis</b><b style="color:#ffa0a0;">hed</b><b style="color:#420000;">Path</b>]]''<sup>[[User talk:TarnishedPath|<b style="color:#bd4004;">talk</b>]]</sup> 10:47, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
|