Content deleted Content added
→Bibliography: add category |
bold |
||
(38 intermediate revisions by 25 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
As business becomes more responsive to unique consumer tastes and derivative
Advanced modeling techniques are necessary to cope with configurable products where changing a small part of a product can have multiple impacts on other product structure models. Concepts within this entry are all caps locked in order to indicate these concepts.▼
▲Advanced modeling techniques are necessary to cope with configurable products where changing a small part of a product can have multiple impacts on other product structure models. Concepts within this entry are
==Product structure concepts==▼
Several concepts are related to the subject of product structure modeling. All these concepts are discussed in this section. These concepts are divided into two main aspects. First the product breakdown is discussed which involves all the physical aspects of a [[Product (business)|product]]. Second, different views at the product structure are indicated.
[[Image:
The core of the product structure is illustrated by the product components (
The
Due to differentiation and variation of items several concepts must be indicated into the product breakdown structure. Three concepts are involved in this differentiation, namely
Product structure views are made upon several activity domains within the company. Due to the fact not everyone in the company has to have a detailed overview of the product several components with their attributes can be extracted.
When the
==The modeling process==
Line 25 ⟶ 26:
! Activity !! Sub-Activity !! Description
|-
| rowspan=3 | Define product components || Identify parts || Identifying parts is concerned with the so-called [[bill of
|-
| Specify sub-assemblies || Several parts mulled together are described as a subassembly. But can also be an atomic component, which is part of the whole assembly.
|-
| Configure product || The assembly is constructed of the parts and
|-
| rowspan=3 | Define product assortment || Specify variants || Variants of the items (parts, subassemblies, assemblies) are defined and specified.
|-
| Specify alternatives || Alternatives of the items (parts,
|-
| Implement revision || If items (parts, subassemblies, assemblies) change they are implemented and the process of modeling the product structure is iterated, in order to ensure consistency.
Line 45 ⟶ 46:
| rowspan=2 | Define product structure views|| Specify needed views || The necessary views, which are important for the product, are specified.
|-
| Create AD specific views || Views on the
|}
Line 68 ⟶ 69:
===Create master structure===
After structuring the product with all the listed items and relationship between them this must be combined into one MASTER STRUCTURE which contains all of the details of the product. In case of the car, all items from engine to screw must be documented in one MASTER STRUCTURE.
[[Image:Product structure modeling example master structure.gif|centre|Figure 6: product master structure]]
===Documenting===
When the MASTER STRUCTURE of the car is created one must link this structure with documents which contains the product definition of this specific car. Primarily, this consists of an extensive description of the car which is linked to the MASTER STRUCTURE of this product.
===Define product structure views===
In case of the car manufacturer multiple views can be
From a purchasing view more information is needed about the mixing of the paint instead of the general color, which is only needed for the customer. Purchasing department also needs more information about the suppliers of the used components within the manufacturing of the car, so they can easily overview where which component is used and
[[Image:Product structure modeling example product structure views.gif|centre|Figure 7: product structure views]]
== See also ==
* [[ISO 10303]]
* [[Assembly modelling|Assembly modeling]]
* [[Bill of
* [[Product breakdown structure]]
==Bibliography==▼
Hvam, L. (1999). A procedure for building product models. ''Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 15'', pp. 77-87▼
Peltonen, H. (2000), Concepts and an Implementation for Product Data Management. ''Acta Polytechnica Scandinavica, Mathematics and Computing Series No. 105'', pp. 188▼
▲== Bibliography ==
Rampersad, H.K. (1995). Concentric Design of Robotic Assembly Systems. ''Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 14''(4), pp. 230-243▼
▲* Hvam, L. (1999). A procedure for building product models. ''Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 15'', pp. 77-87
▲* Peltonen, H. (2000), Concepts and an Implementation for Product Data Management. ''Acta Polytechnica Scandinavica, Mathematics and Computing Series No. 105'', pp. 188
▲* Rampersad, H.K. (1995). Concentric Design of Robotic Assembly Systems. ''Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 14''(4), pp. 230-243
* Svensson, D., & Malmqvist, J. (2002). Strategies for Product Structure Management at Manufacturing Firms. ''Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 2''(1), 50-58.▼
==References==
▲Svensson, D., & Malmqvist, J. (2002). Strategies for Product Structure Management at Manufacturing Firms. ''Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 2''(1), 50-58.
{{Reflist}}
[[Category:Computer-aided design]]
[[Category:Product lifecycle management]]
|