Content deleted Content added
m →Product breakdown: disambig link repair |
bold |
||
(48 intermediate revisions by 35 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
A '''product structure''' is a hierarchical decomposition of a product, typically known as the [[bill of materials]] (BOM).
As business becomes more responsive to unique consumer tastes and derivative products grow to meet the unique configurations, BOM management can become unmanageable. For manufacturers, a bill of materials (BOM) is a critical product information record that lists the raw materials, assemblies, components, parts and the quantities of each needed to manufacture a product.
Advanced modeling techniques are necessary to cope with configurable products where changing a small part of a product can have multiple impacts on other product structure models. Concepts within this entry are in capital letters in order to indicate these concepts.
==Product structure concepts==▼
Several concepts are related to the subject of product structure modeling. All these concepts are discussed in this section. These concepts are divided into two main aspects. First the product breakdown is discussed which involves all the physical aspects of a [[Product (business)|product]]. Second, different views at the product structure are indicated.
[[Image:
▲===Product breakdown===
The core of the product structure is illustrated by the product components (
▲[[Image:Product_structure_modeling_meta-data_model1.gif|right|thumb|300px|Figure 1: product structure concepts]]Figure 1 illustrates the concepts that are important to the structure of a [[Product (business)|product]]. This is a [[Meta-modeling_technique|meta-data model]], which can be used for modeling the instances in a specific case of product structuring.
The
▲The core of the product structure is illustrated by the product components (ITEMS) and their RELATIONSHIPS. Thus, this involves the linking between ITEMS related to the [[Product (business)|product]].
Due to differentiation and variation of items several concepts must be indicated into the product breakdown structure. Three concepts are involved in this differentiation, namely
▲The ASSEMBLY can exist of SUBASSEMBLIES and PARTS, whereas SUBASSEMBLIES can also consist of other SUBASSEMBLIES or PARTS. Thus this is typically hierarchically ordered. These concepts are generalized into the concept of ITEM. This classification is overlapping, due to the fact that a SUBASSEMBLY could be a PART in another ASSEMBLY configuration.
▲Due to differentiation and variation of items several concepts must be indicated into the product breakdown structure. Three concepts are involved in this differentiation, namely ALTERNATIVES, VARIANTS and REVISIONS. An ALTERNATIVE of an ITEM is considered as a substitute for that particular item, whereas a VARIANT is another option of an item which the consumer can choose. When an error occurred at a part or subassembly, it need to be revised. This revisions indicated the change history of a product.
Product structure views are made upon several activity domains within the company. Due to the fact not everyone in the company has to have a detailed overview of the product several components with their attributes can be extracted.
When the
==The modeling process==
Line 26:
! Activity !! Sub-Activity !! Description
|-
| rowspan=3 | Define product components || Identify parts || Identifying parts is concerned with the so-called [[bill of
|-
| Specify sub-assemblies || Several parts mulled together are described as a subassembly. But can also be an atomic component, which is part of the whole assembly.
Line 46:
| rowspan=2 | Define product structure views|| Specify needed views || The necessary views, which are important for the product, are specified.
|-
| Create AD specific views ||
|}
==Process-data model==
When combining the activities with the concepts of the product structure model it will result in a [[Meta-
[[Image:Product structure modeling Process-Data diagram.gif|centre|thumb|500px|Figure 3: Process-Data diagram product structure modeling]]
Line 59 ⟶ 58:
===Define product components===
First, all components are identified and indicated. In the area of car manufacturing, the product components are as follows. A car (ASSEMBLY) consists of several SUBASSEMBLIES such as the body and the engine of the car. The engine for example is assembled in several parts such as screws and small pipes.
===Define product assortment===
Line 71 ⟶ 69:
===Create master structure===
After structuring the product with all the listed items and relationship between them this must be combined into one MASTER STRUCTURE which contains all of the details of the product. In case of the car, all items from engine to screw must be documented in one MASTER STRUCTURE.
[[Image:Product structure modeling example master structure.gif|centre|Figure 6: product master structure]]
===Documenting===
When the MASTER STRUCTURE of the car is created one must link this structure with documents which contains the product definition of this specific car. Primarily, this consists of an extensive description of the car which is linked to the MASTER STRUCTURE of this product.
===Define product structure views===
In case of the car manufacturer multiple views can be
From a purchasing view more information is needed about the mixing of the paint instead of the general color, which is only needed for the customer. Purchasing department also needs more information about the suppliers of the used components within the manufacturing of the car, so they can easily overview where which component is used and
[[Image:Product structure modeling example product structure views.gif|centre|Figure 7: product structure views]]
== See also ==
* [[ISO 10303]]▼
* [[Assembly modelling|Assembly modeling]]▼
* [[Product breakdown structure]]▼
==
* Hvam, L. (1999). A procedure for building product models.
▲*[[ISO 10303]]
* Peltonen, H. (2000), Concepts and an Implementation for Product Data Management.
▲*[[Assembly modelling]]
* Rampersad, H.K. (1995). Concentric Design of Robotic Assembly Systems.
▲*[[Bill of Materials]]
* Svensson, D., & Malmqvist, J. (2002). Strategies for Product Structure Management at Manufacturing Firms.
▲*[[Product breakdown structure]]
▲Hvam, L. (1999). A procedure for building product models. <i>Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 15</i>, pp. 77-87
▲Peltonen, H. (2000), Concepts and an Implementation for Product Data Management. <i>Acta Polytechnica Scandinavica, Mathematics and Computing Series No. 105</i>, pp. 188
==References==
▲Rampersad, H.K. (1995). Concentric Design of Robotic Assembly Systems. <i>Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 14</i>(4), pp. 230-243
{{Reflist}}
[[Category:Computer-aided design]]
▲Svensson, D., & Malmqvist, J. (2002). Strategies for Product Structure Management at Manufacturing Firms. <i>Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 2</i>(1), 50-58.
[[Category:Product lifecycle management]]
|