Classification scheme (information science): Difference between revisions

Revision as of 00:47, 11 March 2021

Latest revision as of 02:50, 18 February 2025

(9 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown)

Line 1:

{{Short description|Type of science}}

In [[information science]] and [[ontology (information science)|ontology]], a '''classification scheme''' is the product of arranging things into kinds of things (classes) or into ''groups'' of classes; this bears similarity to [[categorization]], but with perhaps a more [[classification (general theory)|theoretical]] bent, as classification can be applied over a wide [[semantic spectrum]].

{{expert needed|computer science|reason=boundaries of subject with [[information science]] and relative to [[semantic spectrum]] are unclear.|date=October 2022}}

In [[information science]] and [[ontology (information science)|ontology]], a '''classification scheme''' is thean productarrangement of arrangingclasses thingsor into kindsgroups of things (classes). orThe into ''groups''activity of classes;developing the thisschemes bears similarity to [[categorizationtaxonomy]], but with perhaps a more [[classification (general theory)|theoretical]] bent, as a single classification scheme can be applied over a wide [[semantic spectrum]] while taxonomies tend to be devoted to a single topic.

In the abstract, the resulting structures are a crucial aspect of [[metadata]], often represented as a hierarchical structure and accompanied by descriptive information of the classes or groups. Such a classification scheme is intended to be used for an arrangement or division of individual objects into the classes or groups, and the classes or groups are based on characteristics which the objects (members) have in common.

In the abstract, the resulting structures are a crucial aspect of [[metadata]], often represented as a hierarchical structure and accompanied by descriptive information of the classes or groups. Such a classification scheme is intended to be used for anthe arrangement or division[[classification]] of individual objects into the classes or groups, and the classes or groups are based on characteristics which the objects (members) have in common.

The [[ISO/IEC 11179]] metadata registry standard uses classification schemes as a way to classify administered items, such as [[data element]]s, in a [[metadata registry]].

Line 8 ⟶ 11:

* Whether different kinds are grouped together. In other words, whether it is a grouping system or a pure classification system. In case of grouping, a subset (subgroup) does not have (inherit) all the characteristics of the superset, which makes that the knowledge and requirements about the superset are not applicable for the members of the subset.

* Whether the classes have overlaps.

* Whether subordinates (may) have multiple superordinates. Some classification schemes allow that a kind of thing has more than one superordinate others don'tdo not. Multiple supertypes for one subtype implies that the subordinate has the combined characteristics of all its superordinates. This is called multiple inheritance (of characteristics from multiple superordinates to their subordinates).

* Whether the criteria for belonging to a class or group are well defined.

* Whether the kinds of relations between the concepts are made explicit and well defined.

Line 14 ⟶ 17:

==In linguistics==

In [[linguistics]], [[subordinate]] concepts are described as [[hyponym]]s of their respective superordinates; typically, a hyponym is 'a kind of' its superordinate.<ref>Keith Allan (2002, p. 260), Natural languageLanguage Semantics, Blackwell Publishers Ltd, Oxford, {{ISBN|0-631-19296-4}}.</ref>

==Benefits of using classification schemes==

Line 25 ⟶ 28:

==Kinds of classification schemes==

The following are examples of different kinds of classification schemes. This list is in approximate order from informal to more formal:

* [[thesaurus]] -– a collection of categorized concepts, denoted by words or phrases, that are related to each other by narrower term, wider term and related term relations.

* [[Taxonomy (general)|taxonomy]] -– a formal list of concepts, denoted by controlled words or phrases, arranged from abstract to specific, related by subtype-supertype relations or by superset-subset relations.

* [[data model]] -– an arrangement of concepts (entity types), denoted by words or phrases, that have various kinds of relationships. Typically, but not necessarily, representing requirements and capabilities for a specific scope (application area).

* [[network (mathematics)]] -– an arrangement of objects in a random graph.

* [[Ontology (computer science)|ontology]] -– an arrangement of concepts that are related by various well defined kinds of relations. The arrangement can be visualized in a [[directed acyclic graph]].

One example of a classification scheme for [[data element]]s is a [[representation term]].

Line 35 ⟶ 38:

==See also==

* [[ISO/IEC 11179]]

* [[Faceted classification]]

* [[Metadata]]

* [[Ontology (computer science)]]

* [[Simple Knowledge Organisation System]]

* [[Representation class]]

* [[Representation term]]

* [[Simple Knowledge Organisation System]]

* [[Semantic spectrum]]

Line 46 ⟶ 50:

==External links==

* [https://stats.oecd.org/glossary/detail.asp?ID=358 OECD Glossary of Statistical Terms – Classification Schemes]

* [http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/c035345_ISO_IEC_11179-2_2005(E).zip ISO/IEC 11179-2:2005 Metadata registries (MDR) -– Part 2: Classification]

* [http://metadata-standards.org/metadata-stds/Document-library/Meeting-reports/SC32WG2/2002-05-Seoul/WG2-SEL-018%20ISO-IEC-11179-2%20presentation-to-open-forum.ppt Nancy Lawler's presentation on Classification Schemes] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070928151647/http://metadata-standards.org/metadata-stds/Document-library/Meeting-reports/SC32WG2/2002-05-Seoul/WG2-SEL-018%20ISO-IEC-11179-2%20presentation-to-open-forum.ppt |date=2007-09-28 }}

[[Category:Metadata]]