Content deleted Content added
Added short description Tags: Mobile edit Mobile app edit iOS app edit App description add |
|||
(44 intermediate revisions by 31 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{Short description|Type of science}}
{{expert needed|computer science|reason=boundaries of subject with [[information science]] and relative to [[semantic spectrum]] are unclear.|date=October 2022}}
In [[information science]] and [[ontology (information science)|ontology]], a '''classification scheme''' is an arrangement of classes or groups of classes. The activity of developing the schemes bears similarity to [[taxonomy]], but with perhaps a more theoretical bent, as a single classification scheme can be applied over a wide [[semantic spectrum]] while taxonomies tend to be devoted to a single topic.
In the abstract, the resulting structures are a crucial aspect of [[metadata]], often represented as a hierarchical structure and accompanied by descriptive information of the classes or groups. Such a classification scheme is intended to be used for the [[classification]] of individual objects into the classes or groups, and the classes or groups are based on characteristics which the objects (members) have in common.
The [[ISO/IEC 11179]] metadata registry standard uses classification schemes as a way to classify administered items, such as [[data element]]s, in a [[metadata registry]].
Some quality criteria for classification schemes are:
* Whether different kinds are grouped together. In other words, whether it is a grouping system or a pure classification system. In case of grouping, a subset (subgroup) does not have (inherit) all the characteristics of the superset, which makes that the knowledge and requirements about the superset are not applicable for the members of the subset.
* Whether the classes have overlaps.
* Whether subordinates (may) have multiple superordinates. Some classification schemes allow that a kind of thing has more than one superordinate others
* Whether the criteria for belonging to a class or group are well defined.
* Whether the kinds of relations between the concepts are made explicit and well defined.
* Whether subtype-supertype relations are distinguished from composition relations (part-whole relations) and from object-role relations.
==In linguistics==
==Benefits of using classification schemes==▼
In [[linguistics]], [[subordinate]] concepts are described as [[hyponym]]s of their respective superordinates; typically, a hyponym is 'a kind of' its superordinate.<ref>Keith Allan (2002, p. 260), Natural Language Semantics, Blackwell Publishers Ltd, Oxford, {{ISBN|0-631-19296-4}}.</ref>
▲==Benefits of using classification schemes==
Using one or more classification schemes for the classification of a collection of objects has many benefits. Some of these include:
* It allows a user to find an individual object quickly on the basis of its kind or group.
* It makes it easier to detect duplicate objects.
* It conveys [[semantics]] (meaning) of an object from the definition of its kind, which meaning is not conveyed by the name of the individual object or its way of spelling.
* Knowledge and requirements about a kind of thing can be applied to
of classification schemes==▼
The following are examples of different kinds of classification schemes. This list is in approximate order from informal to more formal:
* [[thesaurus]] – a collection of categorized concepts, denoted by words or phrases, that are related to each other by narrower term, wider term and related term relations.
* [[
* [[
* [[network (mathematics)]] – an arrangement of objects in a random graph.
* [[
One example of a classification scheme for [[data element]]s is a [[representation term]].
Line 34 ⟶ 38:
==See also==
* [[ISO/IEC 11179]]
* [[Metadata]]
* [[Ontology (computer science)]]
* [[Simple Knowledge Organisation System]]▼
* [[Representation class]]
* [[Representation term]]
▲* [[Simple Knowledge Organisation System]]
* [[Semantic spectrum]]
Line 45 ⟶ 50:
==External links==
* [https://stats.oecd.org/glossary/detail.asp?ID=358 OECD Glossary of Statistical Terms – Classification Schemes]
* [http://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/c035345_ISO_IEC_11179-2_2005(E).zip ISO/IEC 11179-2:2005 Metadata registries (MDR)
* [http://metadata-standards.org/metadata-stds/Document-library/Meeting-reports/SC32WG2/2002-05-Seoul/WG2-SEL-018%20ISO-IEC-11179-2%20presentation-to-open-forum.ppt Nancy Lawler's presentation on Classification Schemes] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20070928151647/http://metadata-standards.org/metadata-stds/Document-library/Meeting-reports/SC32WG2/2002-05-Seoul/WG2-SEL-018%20ISO-IEC-11179-2%20presentation-to-open-forum.ppt |date=2007-09-28 }}
[[Category:Metadata]]
[[Category:Metadata registry]]
[[Category:ISO/IEC 11179]]
[[Category:Classification systems]]
▲[[fr:Schéma de classification]]
|