Talk:Operator (computer programming): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Revision as of 11:49, 30 January 2025 edit Stevebroshar (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 5,176 edits →Beating around the bush: Reply Tag: Reply ← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 13:42, 22 February 2025 edit undo Yodo9000 (talk \| contribs) 344 edits →'bifix' operators: new section Tag: New topic
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 37: == What do the prefix, infix and postfix columns of the giant table mean? == Does a 'yes' mean that the language has at least one operator that falls into that category? IfOr sothat all of them do? It's not clear what it means. And regardless, ~~that~~it seems like low value info that should be removed. [[User:Stevebroshar\|Stevebroshar]] ([[User talk:Stevebroshar\|talk]]) 14:31, 28 January 2025 (UTC) == 'bifix' operators == The only source that mentions bifix operators is https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-14455-4_34, and if I read it correctly, it actually refers to "bifix languages" which it defines as languages that have both prefixes and suffixes. So I don't think bifix operators exist (in a notable way), and should be removed from the article. [[User:Yodo9000\|Yodo9000]] ([[User talk:Yodo9000\|talk]]) 13:42, 22 February 2025 (UTC)