Content deleted Content added
Stevebroshar (talk | contribs) |
→'bifix' operators: new section |
||
Line 38:
Does a 'yes' mean that the language has at least one operator that falls into that category? Or that all of them do? It's not clear what it means. And regardless, it seems like low value info that should be removed. [[User:Stevebroshar|Stevebroshar]] ([[User talk:Stevebroshar|talk]]) 14:31, 28 January 2025 (UTC)
== 'bifix' operators ==
The only source that mentions bifix operators is https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-642-14455-4_34, and if I read it correctly, it actually refers to "bifix languages" which it defines as languages that have both prefixes and suffixes. So I don't think bifix operators exist (in a notable way), and should be removed from the article. [[User:Yodo9000|Yodo9000]] ([[User talk:Yodo9000|talk]]) 13:42, 22 February 2025 (UTC)
| |||