Content deleted Content added
→In abstract vector spaces: make line heights standard and not raggedy and weird to read |
→As left- and right-actions: Exchanging the role of V and K^n as discussed in the talk page. |
||
(20 intermediate revisions by 6 users not shown) | |||
Line 2:
{{For|the concept of "passive transformation" in grammar|active voice|passive voice}}
[[File:PassiveActive.JPG|thumb|310px|In the active transformation (left), a point
[[Geometric transformation]]s can be distinguished into two types: '''active''' or '''alibi transformations''' which change the physical position of a set of [[point (geometry)|point]]s relative to a fixed [[frame of reference]] or [[coordinate system]] (''[[alibi]]'' meaning "being somewhere else at the same time"); and '''passive''' or '''alias transformations''' which leave points fixed but change the frame of reference or coordinate system relative to which they are described (''[[pseudonym|alias]]'' meaning "going under a different name").<ref>{{cite book |last1=Crampin |first1=M. |first2=F.A.E. |last2=Pirani |year=1986 |title=Applicable Differential Geometry |publisher=Cambridge University Press |page=22 |isbn=978-0-521-23190-9 |url=https://books.google.com/books?id=iDfk7bjI5qAC&pg=PA22 }}</ref><ref name= Davidson>{{cite book | title=Robots and screw theory: applications of kinematics and statics to robotics | author=Joseph K. Davidson, Kenneth Henderson Hunt | chapter=§4.4.1 The active interpretation and the active transformation | page=74 ''ff'' | chapter-url=https://books.google.com/books?id=OQq67Tr7D0cC&pg=PA74 | isbn=0-19-856245-4 |year=2004 | publisher=Oxford University Press}}</ref> By ''transformation'', [[mathematician]]s usually refer to active transformations, while [[physicist]]s and [[engineer]]s could mean either.{{cn|date=September 2023}}
▲On the other hand, an ''active transformation'' is a transformation of one or more objects with respect to the same coordinate system. For instance, active transformations are useful to describe successive positions of a rigid body. On the other hand, passive transformations may be useful in human motion analysis to observe the motion of the [[tibia]] relative to the [[femur]], that is, its motion relative to a (''local'') coordinate system which moves together with the femur, rather than a (''global'') coordinate system which is fixed to the floor.<ref name = Davidson/>
In [[three-dimensional Euclidean space]], any [[rigid transformation|proper rigid transformation]], whether active or passive, can be represented as a [[screw displacement]], the composition of a [[translation (geometry)|translation]] along an axis and a [[rotation (mathematics)|rotation]] about that axis.
The terms ''active transformation'' and ''passive transformation'' were first introduced in 1957 by [[Valentine Bargmann]] for describing [[Lorentz transformations]] in [[special relativity]].<ref>{{cite journal |last=Bargmann |first=Valentine |title=Relativity |journal=Reviews of Modern Physics |volume=29 |number=2 |year=1957 |pages=161–174 |doi=10.1103/RevModPhys.29.161 |bibcode=1957RvMP...29..161B }}</ref>
== Example ==
[[File:
[[File:Alias and alibi transformations 1 en.png|thumb|upright=1.8|Translation and rotation as passive (''alias'') or active (''alibi'') transformations]]
As an example, let the vector <math>\mathbf{v}=(v_1,v_2) \in \R^2</math>, be a vector in the plane. A rotation of the vector through an angle ''θ'' in counterclockwise direction is given by the [[rotation matrix]]:
Line 34 ⟶ 37:
The new coordinates <math>(v_X,v_Y,v_Z)</math> of <math>\mathbf{v}</math> with respect to the new coordinate system ''XYZ'' are given by:
<math display="block">\mathbf{v} = (v_x,v_y,v_z) =
From this equation one sees that the new coordinates are given by
Line 45 ⟶ 48:
== In abstract vector spaces ==
{{unsourced-section|date=September 2023}}
The distinction between active and passive transformations can be seen mathematically by considering abstract [[vector spaces]].
Line 52 ⟶ 55:
An '''active transformation''' is then an [[endomorphism]] on <math>V</math>, that is, a linear map from <math>V</math> to itself. Taking such a transformation <math>\tau \in \text{End}(V)</math>, a vector <math>v \in V</math> transforms as <math>v \mapsto \tau v</math>. The components of <math>\tau</math> with respect to the basis <math>\mathcal{B}</math> are defined via the equation <math display="inline">\tau e_i = \sum_j\tau_{ji}e_j</math>. Then, the components of <math>v</math> transform as <math>v_i \mapsto \tau_{ij}v_j</math>.
A '''passive transformation''' is instead an endomorphism on <math>K^n</math>. This is applied to the components: <math>v_i \mapsto T_{ij}v_j =: v'_i</math>.
Although the spaces <math>\text{End}(V)</math> and <math>\text{End}({K^n})</math> are isomorphic, they are not canonically isomorphic. Nevertheless a choice of basis <math>\mathcal{B}</math> allows construction of an isomorphism.
Line 64 ⟶ 67:
The inverse in the passive transformation ensures the ''components'' transform identically under <math>\tau</math> and <math>T</math>. This then gives a sharp distinction between active and passive transformations: active transformations [[left action|act from the left]] on bases, while the passive transformations act from the right, due to the inverse.
This observation is made more natural by viewing bases <math>\mathcal{B}</math> as a choice of isomorphism <math>\Phi_{\mathcal{B}}:
This turns the space of bases into a ''left'' <math>\text{GL}(V)</math>-[[torsor]] and a ''right'' <math>\text{GL}(n, K)</math>-torsor.
|