Kashem overflow

Revision as of 18:01, 7 March 2023

Latest revision as of 00:33, 28 February 2025

(10 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)

Line 85:

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. [[User:FireflyBot|FireflyBot]] ([[User talk:FireflyBot|talk]]) 18:01, 7 March 2023 (UTC)

==Your draft article, [[Draft:Rebill]]==

[[File:Information icon4.svg|48px|left|alt=|link=]]

Hello, Kashem overflow. It has been over six months since you last edited the [[WP:AFC|Articles for Creation]] submission or [[WP:Drafts|Draft]] page you started, "[[Draft:Rebill|Rebill]]".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia [[WP:mainspace|mainspace]], the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/G13?withJS=MediaWiki:G13-restore-wizard.js&page=Draft%3ARebill request its undeletion]. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. <!-- Template:Db-draft-deleted --><!-- Template:Db-csd-deleted-custom --> <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">[[User:Liz|'''''L'''''iz]]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">[[Special:Contributions/Liz|'''''Read!''''']] [[User talk:Liz|'''''Talk!''''']]</sup> 17:39, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

== July 2023 ==

<div class="user-block uw-upeblock" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid #a9a9a9; background-color: #ffefd5; min-height: 40px">[[File:Stop x nuvola.svg|left|40px|alt=|link=]]<p>Your account has been '''blocked indefinitely''' for [[WP:Spam|advertising or promotion]] and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's [[WP:TOU|Terms of Use]]. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory [[Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure|paid editing disclosure requirements]]. Paid advocacy is a form of [[Wikipedia:Conflict of interest|conflict of interest]] (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is [[WP:What Wikipedia is not#Wikipedia is not a soapbox or means of promotion|contrary]] to the [[WP:Five pillars|purpose of Wikipedia]].</p><p>If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our [[WP:Guide to appealing blocks|guide to appealing blocks]] to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. --><code><nowiki>{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}</nowiki></code> at the end of [[Special:MyTalk|your user talk page]]. For that request to be considered, you must:</p>

* Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.

* State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.

* Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

[[User:GeneralNotability|GeneralNotability]] ([[User talk:GeneralNotability|talk]]) 18:05, 28 July 2023 (UTC)</div>[[Category:Wikipedians who are indefinitely blocked for a violation of the Terms of Use|{{PAGENAME}}]]<!-- Template:uw-upeblock -->

:Hello @[[User:GeneralNotability|GeneralNotability]],

:First of all, I am not being paid by any of the topics that I have written. And the two articles that I have published, which had COI declarations, I have declared that. I am mostly a reader here, and I don't do so many edits. The edits that I have made has nothing to do with any payments or any sorts of payments. You may indicate the [[Draft:Bashar Georgis]] article, which could be paid. I am not being paid or have any kind of COI with the subject. He is a filmmaker from Bangladesh and I knew him by his works.Just out of interest I developed his article and put some references on. How on earth this could be a paid work? There was another editor who started the draft, he might be paid or not (He is his Id- [[User:Sabih omar|Sabih Omar]]) and I just developed it. What is wrong with it? And how did I advertise anything? Why I am being blocked for advertising or promotion? For which article? Please indicate the exact articles or edits. [[User:Kashem overflow|Kashem overflow]] ([[User talk:Kashem overflow#top|talk]]) 06:08, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

::I am looking at an Upwork post that matches some edits you've made, and even without that evidence the pattern of articles you've created and edited pretty clearly looks like you've been editing for pay. [[User:GeneralNotability|GeneralNotability]] ([[User talk:GeneralNotability|talk]]) 15:36, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

:::Hi @[[User:GeneralNotability|GeneralNotability]],

:::First of all, I am not even on Upwork. Even if I was on Upwork I would have declared that. I know how to handle COI and also did that in my two articles. So it is certain that I know how paid editing works. But I had and still have no financial stakes.

:::And can you please share which of the edits felt like I did for money? And exactly which Upwork job you are looking at? I mean which article you are talking about? You blocked me for advertising and promotion. Where is the advertising or promotion I made? Please indicate those. [[User:Kashem overflow|Kashem overflow]] ([[User talk:Kashem overflow#top|talk]]) 19:02, 29 July 2023 (UTC)

{{unblock reviewed|1= First of all I am not alleging anyone for the block. But the admin who blocked me for advertising or promotion also said that I failed to adhere to the paid editing disclosure. I have published three articles till now. Two of them were published via AFC because of COI. And one was published directly. So it proves that I am aware of COI and paid editing rules. So I would never make mistakes regarding this intentionally or unintentionally. I am not sure, because the blocking admin didn't mention which of my editing made him block me but I believe that the recent concern was raised after my contribution to [[Draft:Bashar Georgis]]. Before me, Another editor published the article and got rejected. And then with good faith, I just added some references to the article. I didn't know if the previous editor [[User:Sabih Omar]] was paid or not. I just improved his article with good faith.

*I am already aware of the rules regarding paid editing and COI editing. With good faith, I can say that none of my editing till now was directly or indirectly paid Or I get compensated by any means.

*None of my editing reflects that I have created an advertisement or anything related to this.

*The blocking admin states that he saw the Upwork job, which matches my editing. But didn't clearly mention which article. And the thing is I don't even have an Upwork account. Let alone getting paid by anyone through Upwork. If I had any I would have mentioned that. Cause I clearly know the TOC.

*I have been reading Wikipedia articles for my own research for over three years. In the meantime, if I had encountered with any situation where I could improve, I have done that. I always like to read Wikipedia articles. But before any editing, I had done my research and tried to educate myself about the rules regarding any editing. This even happened now. After getting blocked. I took time to read all the rules and crosschecked each and every edit that I made and also read the rules about creating unblocking requests. Then I am here to request unblock.

* I strongly state that I am being clear and honest with my editing till now, and will always be.

So, I would like to request to evaluate my request and unblock me. And permit me to contribute to Wikipedia in good faith. Thanks.

[[User:Kashem overflow|Kashem overflow]] ([[User talk:Kashem overflow#top|talk]]) 05:03, 7 August 2023 (UTC)|decline= I can't speak to the Upwork issue as I don't have access to the ticket cited, but I see some of the same red flags in your editing as GeneralNotability. I am declining your request. [[User:331dot|331dot]] ([[User talk:331dot|talk]]) 08:43, 7 August 2023 (UTC) }}

== Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:Bashar Georgis|Bashar Georgis]] (November 3) ==

<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> [[File:AFC-Logo_Decline.svg|50px|left]]Your recent article submission to [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for Creation]] has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.<nowiki> </nowiki>The reasons left by Darling were:

{{divbox|gray|3=This submission's references do not show that the subject [[Wikipedia:Notability|qualifies for a Wikipedia article]]—that is, they do not show ''significant'' coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in ''published'', [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|''reliable'']], [[Wikipedia:No_original_research#Secondary|''secondary'']] sources that are ''[[Wikipedia:Independent sources|independent]]'' of the subject (see the [[Wikipedia:Notability (people)|guidelines on the notability of people]]). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see [[Help:Referencing_for_beginners#Inserting_a_reference|technical help]] and learn about [[Wikipedia:Common sourcing mistakes (notability)|mistakes to avoid]] when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}}<!--

-->{{divbox|gray|3=This submission does not appear to be written in [[Wikipedia:Writing better articles#Information style and tone|the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article]]. Entries should be written from a [[Wikipedia:Neutral point of view|neutral point of view]], and should refer to a range of [[Wikipedia:Reliable sources|independent, reliable, published sources]]. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch#Puffery|peacock terms]] that promote the subject.|}}<!--

--

-->&nbsp;The comment the reviewer left was:

{{divbox|blue|3=added sources don't change much.}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit ''after they have been resolved''.

{{clear}}

* If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to [[Draft:Bashar Georgis]] and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.

* If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#G13. Abandoned Drafts and Articles for creation submissions|may be deleted]].

* If you need any assistance, or have experienced any [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Scam warning|untoward behavior]] associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the <span class="plainlinks">[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Bashar_Georgis '''Articles for creation help desk''']</span>, on the <span class="plainlinks">[//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Darling&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Bashar_Georgis '''reviewer's talk page''']</span> or use [[Wikipedia:IRC help disclaimer|Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors]].

—[[User:Darling|darling]] ([[User talk:Darling|talk]]) 02:19, 3 November 2023 (UTC)</div><!--Template:AfC decline-->

{| style="margin: 0.4em 2em;"

|- style="vertical-align: top;"

| [[File:WP teahouse logo 2.png|alt=Teahouse logo]]

| <div style="background-color:#e1e6db; color: #393D38; padding: 1em; font-size: 1.1em; border-radius:10px;box-shadow:-2px -2px 1px #8e8a78;">Hello, '''Kashem overflow'''!

Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the '''[[Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk|Articles for creation help desk]]'''. If you have any ''other'' questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the '''[[Wikipedia:Teahouse|Teahouse]]''', a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! —[[User:Darling|darling]] ([[User talk:Darling|talk]]) 02:19, 3 November 2023 (UTC)</div>

|}<!-- Wikipedia:Teahouse/AfC Invitation -->

[[Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC]]

== [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:Bidyut Chakrabarty]] ==

[[File:Ambox warning yellow.svg|left|link=|alt=Notice|48px|]]

The article [[:Bidyut Chakrabarty]] has been [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed for deletion]]&#32;because of the following concern:

<blockquote>'''Not a notable figure'''</blockquote>

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be [[WP:DEL#REASON|deleted for any of several reasons]].

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your [[Help:edit summary|edit summary]] or on [[Talk:Bidyut Chakrabarty|the article's talk page]].

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the [[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|proposed deletion process]], but other [[Wikipedia:deletion process|deletion process]]es exist. In particular, the [[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|speedy deletion]] process can result in deletion without discussion, and [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion|articles for deletion]] allows discussion to reach [[Wikipedia:Consensus|consensus]] for deletion.<!-- Template:Proposed deletion notify -->

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the [[Special:PageHistory/Bidyut Chakrabarty|page's history]] for further information. [[User:DatBot|DatBot]] ([[User talk:DatBot|talk]]) 00:33, 28 February 2025 (UTC)