Content deleted Content added
→Basic process: Slash unnecessary detail. |
GreenC bot (talk | contribs) Rescued 2 archive links; reformat 2 links. Wayback Medic 2.5 per WP:USURPURL and JUDI batch #26ah |
||
(12 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{Use mdy dates|date=September 2012}}
[[File:Air National Guard - Flickr - The National Guard (1).jpg|thumb|The [[Air National Guard]] is the primary user of DSP.]]
The '''disruptive solutions process''' ('''DSP''') is a
==Overview==
The typical defense industry bureaucratic approach to problem-solving involves long [[
Recent attempts to resolve inefficiencies include overwhelming the problem with funding, resources, and manpower—for example, major weapon systems development, such as a new fighter jet or IT system.<ref>
Because most preventable safety mishaps are caused by human factors,<ref>Catalog of Air Force Statistics by Aircraft Type, considered typical for US Military [http://www.afsc.af.mil/organizations/aviation/aircraftstatistics/index.asp] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20081205120401/http://www.afsc.af.mil/organizations/aviation/aircraftstatistics/index.asp |date=December 5, 2008 }}</ref> safety should apply a [[Creative disruption|disruptive]], [[Iterative and incremental development|iterative approach]] that may not be appropriate in hardware-focused programs, such as aircraft production.
To address the cultural issues associated with mishap prevention in a large bureaucracy, the [[Air National Guard]] safety directorate used Boyd's [[OODA Loop|Observe, Orient, Decide, Act Loop]] to assess the effectiveness of the process. This was the origin of DSP.
DSP is persistent and adaptive:
{{blockquote|Persistence is about refusing to give up even in the face of adversity. Adaptation is about shortening the time to success through ingenuity and flexibility. "Adaptive persistence" entails alternating between anticipation, changing course, and sticking with it, deftly navigating that paradox with aplomb.}}
==Basic process==
1. IDEA MINING: use professionals at the field unit level to identify best practices for mishap prevention. Project unpublished requirements by including end-use customers in the idea mining process.▼
2. CONSOLIDATE: Heuristically sort ideas into groups based on resource requirements, proven record, technology leveraging, mission accomplishment, identified needs. Order all projects based on overall value.▼
More recently, DSP has been used in the [[Air National Guard|ANG]] and [[USAF]] to create and field mishap prevention programs. Safety programs created, executed, or developed using DSP:▼
DSP is a six-step process that focuses on projecting future market needs by looking at front-line problem solving activity and scaling those solutions up. Although the full algorithm has not been publicly published as of January 2024, the following process has been made public:
'''SEE AND AVOID''' – Joint DOD and Interagency with AOPA, EAA, and FAA. It is a web based civilian-military midair collision avoidance program created by then-Lt Col Ed Vaughan and led by ANG Safety directorate from 2005 to 2009, considered a best practice. ACC is partner; AFCENT asked for Iraq, Afghanistan coverage, now under contract, currently led and funded by FAA and ANG.<ref>[http://www.SeeAndAvoid.org See And Avoid] {{webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20061020000103/http://www.seeandavoid.org/ |date=October 20, 2006 }}</ref>▼
▲1.
'''WingmanDay.org''': Originally fielded as RealBase across the Air National Guard...this Comprehensive Commander’s Toolkit identifies safety issues, resiliency subject matter, and provides tools for commanders, leaders, and care practitioners to address; created by ANG Safety directorate after 2007 Safety Stand Down Day to provide ONE STOP SHOPPING for commanders and leaders. The RealBase web portal ran through 2009, when IT officials at the National Guard Bureau suspended it. In 2011, the program was relaunched as Wingman Day. The Air Force Safety Center took the RealBase Toolkit concept and developed one-stop-shopping online tool kits hosted on the secure Air Force Portal.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.wingmanday.org/ |title=Wingman Day |access-date=November 28, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20161202213017/http://wingmanday.org/ |archive-date=December 2, 2016 |url-status=dead }}</ref>▼
▲2. CONSOLIDATE / RACK AND STACK:
3. ELIMINATE BAD FITS: Scrub the list for those items requiring major hardware, Air Force Major Command level funding, or other special, difficult to acquire funding or processes. Also remove from consideration solutions that duplicate or compete directly with future programmed or existing military programs unless the cost savings is significant, as well as those programs that are not scalable in scope.
4. SELECT AND DEM/VAL: Consider resource requirements and rapidly source field unit funding or headquarters seed monies in the sub-$50K range to perform a limited demonstration and validation (DEM/VAL) of concept. Use rapid contracting mechanisms through government contracting office, primarily employing SBA set-asides, blanket purchase agreements, or previously procured assets that may be re-roled into current use.
5. ITERATE FOR RESULTS: Establish definition of success that are measurable and reportable. Then, demonstrate measurable results within six months. Meanwhile, seek further external and scalable funding from sources such as DARPA, Defense Safety Oversight Council (DSOC), other services, other government agencies, etc.
6. LEAD AND MARKET: Market the solution intensely and seek buy in by returning the solution to same experts that initially proposed it. Identify capable project leaders to run with the project.
'''dBird bird mortality model'''. Created and developed as interagency program combining partners from [[Centers for Disease Control and Prevention|CDC]], [[Smithsonian]], [[National Science Foundation|NSF]], [[USDA]], [[United States Department of Homeland Security|DHS]], and [[NOAA]] under ANG leadership to track, target, and predict movements of pathogen-infected bird flocks using [[Bird strike|BASH]] resources such as BAM/AHAS, NexRAD radar system, and others.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.dbird.us/ |title=dBird, Bird Mortality Model |access-date=November 28, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20140102002503/http://dbird.us/ |archive-date=January 2, 2014 |url-status=dead }}</ref> ▼
This is a form of the more well known [[OODA loop]]. Step 1 is Observe, steps 2 and 3 are Orient, steps 4 and 5 are Decide, and step 6 is Act.
==History==
The disruptive solutions process was first used in 2004, when a joint team led by Vaughan created Project ''Black Mountain''. The project evolved from a combined requirement to share real-time tactical data among ground and air forces, as well as avoid [[mid-air collision]]s within the [[area of responsibility]]. The term 'disruptive' was borrowed from the marketing term "[[disruptive technologies]]".
▲More recently, DSP has been used in the [[Air National Guard
'''Low Altitude Deconfliction Program''' – Deconflict.org is online scheduling function with [[FAA]]'s MADE program to provide collision avoidance for military aircraft operating in low altitude environment.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.deconflict.org/ |title=Low Level Deconfliction |access-date=July 26, 2019 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20110520002506/http://www.deconflict.org/ |archive-date=May 20, 2011 |url-status=dead }}</ref>▼
▲* ''
'''Ready 54''' – Ready54.org is online joint resiliency outreach and education tool with associated mobile apps. Ready 54 is a joint endeavor between the Air and Army National Guard.<ref>[http://www.ready54.org/about/ Ready 54 About Us]</ref>▼
▲
* ''FlyAwake'': a web-based fatigue risk management tool which returns quantitative fatigue analysis for a given flight schedule.<ref>{{Cite web |url=http://www.flyawake.org/ |title=Fly Awake, User-Friendly Fatigue Assessment and Mitigation |access-date=February 17, 2009 |archive-date=January 17, 2009 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090117025735/http://www.flyawake.org/ |url-status=dead }}</ref>
* ''[[Wingman Project]]'': a suicide intervention initiative that shows family and friends of distressed Airmen how to intervene to save a life, providing training in 54 U.S. states and territories.<ref>{{usurped|1=[https://web.archive.org/web/20091006181638/http://www.wingmanproject.org/ The Wingman Project]}}</ref>
▲
▲
▲
On September 25, 2009, Dr. John Ohab of the American Forces Press Service interviewed Vaughan about DSP.<ref>[http://science.dodlive.mil/tag/wingman-project/ Wingman Project]</ref><ref>[https://adityarajsingh.com/ About Aditya Raj Singh]</ref>
==See also==
Line 89 ⟶ 70:
==External links==
* The Wingman Project: {{usurped|1=[https://archive.today/20091006181638/http://www.wingmanproject.org/ Suicide Intervention]}}
* See And Avoid: [https://web.archive.org/web/20061020000103/http://www.seeandavoid.org/ Civil/Military Mid-Air Collision Avoidance]
* Richards, Chet: [https://web.archive.org/web/20090227065603/http://www.d-n-i.net/boyd/boyds_ooda_loop.ppt OODA explained]. Seven-slide presentation explaining the OODA Loop
Line 96 ⟶ 77:
* Lockheed's Skunkworks: [https://web.archive.org/web/20090227060019/http://www.lockheedmartin.com/aeronautics/skunkworks/14rules.html Kelly's 14 Rules]
* Seamless Compassion, One-stop Automated Public Assistance: [https://web.archive.org/web/20110826220933/http://seamlesscompassion.org/ Seamless Compassion Link]
* FlyAwake: [http://www.flyawake.org Pilot Fatigue Mitigation] {{Webarchive|url=https://web.archive.org/web/20090117025735/http://www.flyawake.org/ |date=January 17, 2009 }}
[[Category:United States Air Force]]
|