Content deleted Content added
mNo edit summary |
MichaelMaggs (talk | contribs) Adding short description: "US Department of Defense contractors" |
||
(43 intermediate revisions by 25 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{Short description|US Department of Defense contractors}}
'''Systems Engineering and Technical
==Use of the term==
SETA is an industry term, which the DoD has used since at least 1995, for example in the Software Engineering Institute;<ref name=report95>{{cite web|author1=James A Rozum, William A Florac|title=A DoD Software Measurement Pilot: Applying the SEI Core|url=http://resources.sei.cmu.edu/asset_files/technicalreport/1995_005_001_16319.pdf|publisher=Software engineering Institute|accessdate=6 December 2014}}</ref> 'Defense Acquisition Deskbook, "S"; the An Acronym List for the Information Age (Armed Forces Communications and Electronics Association); the DoD Guide to Integrated Product and Process Development.<ref>{{cite web|title=DoD Guide to Integrated Product and Process Development |url=http://www.acqnotes.com/Attachments/DoD%20Integrated%20Product%20and%20Process%20Development%20Handbook,%20Aug%2098.pdf |accessdate=5 August 2020}}</ref>
==Contracting==
The government often needs to supplement its internal Systems Engineering and Technical
The SETA support rate in total R&D expenditures of [[DARPA]] are evaluating as 7.4-9.9%.<ref>Klabukov I.D., Yakovets A.V., Alekhin M.D. (2017). [https://ssrn.com/abstract=2933553 Management of systems engineering and technical assistance of DARPA research programs]. Innovations, 5(223), 12-19.</ref>
==Policy==
The policy related to SETA contractors can be found in the [[Federal Acquisition Regulation]] (
FAR Part 37 is the starting point for guidance for these types of contracts. Subpart 37.2 defines advisory and assistance services and provides that the use of such services is a legitimate way to improve the prospects for program or systems success. FAR Part 37.201(c) defines engineering and technical services used in support of a program office during the acquisition cycle. FAR 16.505(c)
Use of SETA contracts and NDAs allows for services involving systems and data and providing assistance and advice. This excludes Inherently Governmental Functions (IGF), as defined in statue by Public Law 105 - Federal Activities Inventory Reform Act (the "FAIR Act") of 1998 and in regulation by OMB Circular A-76.<ref>{{cite web |url=https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R40641.pdf |title=Inherently Governmental Functions and Department of Defense Operations: Background, Issues, and Options for Congress }}</ref>
==See also==
*[[Contracting Officer's Technical Representative]]
*[[Systems Engineering]]
==
{{reflist}}
* [http://acquisition.gov/far/index.html Federal Acquisition Regulation]▼
* [http://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/dfars/index.htm Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation]▼
* [http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/ Department of Defense Issuances]▼
==
▲* [http://acquisition.gov/far/index.html Federal Acquisition Regulation]
▲* [https://web.archive.org/web/20070109230744/http://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/dfars/index.htm Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation]
▲* [https://web.archive.org/web/20010913132309/http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/ Department of Defense Issuances]
* [https://figshare.com/articles/SETA_Support_DARPA_FY2010_FY2015_Data_Base/4759186 DARPA SETA Support FY2010 / FY2015 Database] DOI:10.6084/m9.figshare.4759186.v2
* [https://www.govinfo.gov/app/details/PLAW-105publ270 Public Law 105 - 270 - Federal Activities Inventory Reform Act of 1998]
* [https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/whitehouse.gov/files/omb/circulars/A76/a076.pdf OMB Circular A-76]
[[Category:
[[Category:United States defense procurement]]
[[Category:Systems engineering]]
|