Content deleted Content added
Ebukadneza (talk | contribs) →Netwide: was already deleted +1 |
YannickFran (talk | contribs) |
||
| (10 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{WikiProject Computing|class=Start|importance=|software=yes|software-importance=}}▼
{{WikiProject Computer science|class=start|importance=low}}▼
{{User:MiszaBot/config
|archiveheader = {{aan}}
Line 8 ⟶ 6:
|algo = old(365d)
|archive = Talk:Comparison of integrated development environments/Archive %(counter)d
{{WikiProject banner shell|class=Start|
}}
{{archive box|auto=yes|age=365|units=days|bot=Lowercase sigmabot III}}
Line 76 ⟶ 78:
::: I agree with Jwmurphy, today most IDE have plugin to support wide range of language. The current organization is a mess. We can have some colones with the most current language (C, PHP, Python, ...) and a colones with "others supported language" with comma separated language name. [[User:Gagarine|Gagarine]] ([[User talk:Gagarine|talk]]) 13:19, 8 September 2018 (UTC)
::::Current list is definitely not good, I agree with the comments above. This list may serve those who are looking for IDEs for a particular language but many IDEs support multiple languages and a lot of people would be looking for a general list of IDEs [[Special:Contributions/82.194.57.136|82.194.57.136]] ([[User talk:82.194.57.136|talk]]) 07:48, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
::::: [[User:Jwmurphy|Jwmurphy]] was completely right and unfortunately now 14 years later it shows for anyone to see, the lemma is a pure mess, inconsistent, and also with huge gaps. E.g. "Ruby" has only 6 or so listed, while MOST of the IDEs listed at Python would do the job, too. So what now, copy 30 IDEs to Ruby and all other languages that these IDEs support? That makes no sense. The proposal of Jmurphy should be realized now to fix this mess. --[[User:Tomakos|Tomakos]] ([[User talk:Tomakos|talk]]) 02:57, 7 November 2022 (UTC)
== Smalltalk ==
I found it a shame that the mother of all IDEs (ST80 and its offspring) is not even mentioned. Also, what about Lisp systems? 15 November 2008 (UTC) <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/84.161.254.73|84.161.254.73]] ([[User talk:84.161.254.73|talk]]) </span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
== Adjusted Python Editor/IDE list ==
Line 204 ⟶ 195:
{{collapse bottom}}
▲|}
== Eclipse ADT ==
Line 258 ⟶ 220:
:By using wikidata it should always be quite up to date. [[User:Ebukadneza|Ebukadneza]] ([[User talk:Ebukadneza|talk]]) 11:15, 19 July 2022 (UTC)
== VSCodium under the 'Java' heading ==
Could someone clarify why VSCodium is being noted instead of VSCode itself? Although VSCodium is an open-source build of VSCode, these are generally not considered to be IDEs. Additionally, while VSCode does come with [https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/languages/overview out-of-the-box support for JavaScript, HTML, and CSS], it requires an extension pack to work with Java. It may be helpful to mention this in the article, as is done in other instances where VSCode is mentioned. [[Special:Contributions/145.33.121.1|145.33.121.1]] ([[User talk:145.33.121.1|talk]]) 09:48, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
:VS Code is currently listed under 'Visual Basic .NET', but it is neither billed as an IDE nor dedicated to any one language. I see no reason it should even be mentioned on this page. [[User:Walkersam|Walkersam]] ([[User talk:Walkersam|talk]]) 07:50, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
:There is no reason for it. As per the requirements of this page, an IDE should have an article written about it before even being considered for inclusion here. VSCodium doesn't have it. The fact that it's just a renamed VS Code link says enough. As such, it's been switched out with VS Code. [[User:YannickFran|YannickFran]] ([[User talk:YannickFran|talk]]) 16:08, 15 March 2025 (UTC)
== Common Lisp Intellij Plugin/Visual Code plugin ==
There are plugins available that bring common lisp ide to Intellij/Visual Code, maybe they should be added? [[Special:Contributions/94.74.252.2|94.74.252.2]] ([[User talk:94.74.252.2|talk]]) 10:30, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
== CoreIDE provides better features than many IDEs listed here ==
Most of the IDE's listed here are outdated. No one is using them any more. On the other side recently developed CoreIDE comes free with all the features any modern IDE provides. Shouldn't that be listed here? I believe if a developer wants to compare the IDEs then they should see all the modern IDEs not the legacy IDEs which are not even updated or released in the past few years.
The title of this article is "Comparison of integrated development environments" then it should compare all the IDEs. It is misleading the reader to assume that there are not anymore IDEs available. If you can not add all the IDEs in the list then better rename the title to- "Comparison of notable integrated development environments"
CoreIDE website- https://coreide.com/ [[User:SE.SAURAV|SE.SAURAV]] ([[User talk:SE.SAURAV|talk]]) 01:53, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
== Cursor editor ==
Should add something about the Cursor editor at cursor.com. There are assorted articles on the editors from other web sites especially medium.com. Is being compared to VS Code. I'm not sure where to add it so I'll leave it to others to handle. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/216.75.166.166|216.75.166.166]] ([[User talk:216.75.166.166#top|talk]]) 16:45, 6 September 2024 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
| |||