Talk:Comparison of integrated development environments: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Add topic

Revision as of 09:48, 14 March 2023 edit 145.33.121.1 (talk) →VSCodium under the 'Java' heading: new section Tag: New topic ← Previous edit		Latest revision as of 16:08, 15 March 2025 edit undo YannickFran (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users 2,642 edits →VSCodium under the 'Java' heading: Reply Tag: Reply
(8 intermediate revisions by 7 users not shown)
Line 1: {{WikiProject Computing\|class=Start\|importance=\|software=yes\|software-importance=}}▼ {{WikiProject Computer science\|class=start\|importance=low}}▼ {{User:MiszaBot/config \|archiveheader = {{aan}} Line 8 ⟶ 6: \|algo = old(365d) \|archive = Talk:Comparison of integrated development environments/Archive %(counter)d \|}}▼ {{WikiProject banner shell\|class=Start\| ▲{{WikiProject Computing~~\|class=Start~~\|importance=\|software=yes\|software-importance=}} ▲{{WikiProject Computer science~~\|class=start~~\|importance=low}} }} {{archive box\|auto=yes\|age=365\|units=days\|bot=Lowercase sigmabot III}} Line 81 ⟶ 83: I found it a shame that the mother of all IDEs (ST80 and its offspring) is not even mentioned. Also, what about Lisp systems? 15 November 2008 (UTC) <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/84.161.254.73\|84.161.254.73]] ([[User talk:84.161.254.73\|talk]]) </span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> ~~== Autocomplete feature is a bit unclear... ==~~ ~~Some IDEs only has autocomplete for keywords, some others can even list methods of objects.~~ Could we add a "" to the "Yes" to let others distinguish them? <small><span class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Ppc123\|Ppc123]] ([[User talk:Ppc123\|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Ppc123\|contribs]]) 02:47, 23 July 2012 (UTC)</span></small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> ~~== Scheme/Racket ==~~ Should there be a section on IDE's aimed at Scheme or Racket programming? Probably the most widely-used one is [http://racket-lang.org DrRacket], and that's the only one I've used in recent years, but I'm sure there are others. ~~[[User:Sbloch\|Sbloch]] ([[User talk:Sbloch\|talk]]) 13:55, 24 August 2012 (UTC)~~ == Adjusted Python Editor/IDE list == Line 205 ⟶ 195: {{collapse bottom}} ~~== Something is wrong with some of the sortable tables ==~~ On the current version of the page, some of the sortable tables only sort the first time (as ascending) on the column you choose. After that, clicking to sort on that column or any other column does not work. I checked this in two browsers and compared to other Wiki pages. This issue exists on this page alone (out of the ones I checked). Having reviewed the code, I cannot immediately see why this is happening with my limited wiki-coding knowledge. However, I was hoping someone else with greater knowledge might see this and figure out why this is happening. ~~Example is the C/C++ table. Might it be due to number of items????~~ ~~UPDATE: I opened my JavaScript Console in my browser. On the C/C++ table alone, the following error is produced on the second click to re-sort the table:~~ {\| \|- \| colspan="2" width="500pt" valign="top" \| <span style="color:red">Uncaught TypeError: Cannot call method 'format' of undefined</span> \|\| load.php?debug=false&lang=en&modules=jquery.tablesorter&skin=vector&… ~~version=20130817T022511Z&:3~~ \|- ~~\|    \|\| valign="top" \| <span style="color:red">buildCache</span> \|\| load.php?debug=false&lang=en&modules=jquery.tablesorter&skin=vector&…~~ ~~version=20130817T022511Z&:3~~ \|- ~~\|    \|\| valign="top" \| <span style="color:red">$headers.filter.on.mousedown.onselectstart</span> \|\| load.php?debug=false&lang=en&modules=jquery.tablesorter&skin=vector&…~~ ~~version=20130817T022511Z&:12~~ \|- ~~\|    \|\| valign="top" \| <span style="color:red">jQuery.event.dispatch</span> \|\| load.php?debug=false&lang=en&modules=jquery%2Cmediawiki%2CSpinner%7C…~~ ~~jquery.l%7Cmw.MwEmbedSupport&only=scripts&skin=vector&version=20130817T022511Z:45~~ \|- ~~\|    \|\| valign="top" \| <span style="color:red">elemData.handle.eventHandle</span> \|\| load.php?debug=false&lang=en&modules=jquery%2Cmediawiki%2CSpinner%7C…~~ ~~jquery.l%7Cmw.MwEmbedSupport&only=scripts&skin=vector&version=20130817T022511Z:38~~ ▲\|} ~~[[User:Kdmckale\|Kdmckale]] ([[User talk:Kdmckale\|talk]]) 21:18, 18 August 2013 (UTC)~~ ~~==Multithread debug capacity==~~ What do you think about adding a "multithread debug" information as note [n] in debug column ? ''24 Feb 2013'' <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/78.251.17.244\|78.251.17.244]] ([[User talk:78.251.17.244\|talk]]) 12:52, 24 February 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> == Eclipse ADT == Line 263 ⟶ 224: Could someone clarify why VSCodium is being noted instead of VSCode itself? Although VSCodium is an open-source build of VSCode, these are generally not considered to be IDEs. Additionally, while VSCode does come with [https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/languages/overview out-of-the-box support for JavaScript, HTML, and CSS], it requires an extension pack to work with Java. It may be helpful to mention this in the article, as is done in other instances where VSCode is mentioned. [[Special:Contributions/145.33.121.1\|145.33.121.1]] ([[User talk:145.33.121.1\|talk]]) 09:48, 14 March 2023 (UTC) :VS Code is currently listed under 'Visual Basic .NET', but it is neither billed as an IDE nor dedicated to any one language. I see no reason it should even be mentioned on this page. [[User:Walkersam\|Walkersam]] ([[User talk:Walkersam\|talk]]) 07:50, 8 March 2024 (UTC) :There is no reason for it. As per the requirements of this page, an IDE should have an article written about it before even being considered for inclusion here. VSCodium doesn't have it. The fact that it's just a renamed VS Code link says enough. As such, it's been switched out with VS Code. [[User:YannickFran\|YannickFran]] ([[User talk:YannickFran\|talk]]) 16:08, 15 March 2025 (UTC) == Common Lisp Intellij Plugin/Visual Code plugin == There are plugins available that bring common lisp ide to Intellij/Visual Code, maybe they should be added? [[Special:Contributions/94.74.252.2\|94.74.252.2]] ([[User talk:94.74.252.2\|talk]]) 10:30, 19 March 2023 (UTC) == CoreIDE provides better features than many IDEs listed here == Most of the IDE's listed here are outdated. No one is using them any more. On the other side recently developed CoreIDE comes free with all the features any modern IDE provides. Shouldn't that be listed here? I believe if a developer wants to compare the IDEs then they should see all the modern IDEs not the legacy IDEs which are not even updated or released in the past few years. The title of this article is "Comparison of integrated development environments" then it should compare all the IDEs. It is misleading the reader to assume that there are not anymore IDEs available. If you can not add all the IDEs in the list then better rename the title to- "Comparison of notable integrated development environments" CoreIDE website- https://coreide.com/ [[User:SE.SAURAV\|SE.SAURAV]] ([[User talk:SE.SAURAV\|talk]]) 01:53, 6 May 2023 (UTC) == Cursor editor == Should add something about the Cursor editor at cursor.com. There are assorted articles on the editors from other web sites especially medium.com. Is being compared to VS Code. I'm not sure where to add it so I'll leave it to others to handle. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures\|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/216.75.166.166\|216.75.166.166]] ([[User talk:216.75.166.166#top\|talk]]) 16:45, 6 September 2024 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->