Content deleted Content added
m →Deprecation and withdrawal: Remove leading zeros from dates |
m mandation is not a word |
||
(30 intermediate revisions by 17 users not shown) | |||
Line 1:
{{Short description|Medical code system used in the UK}}
'''Read codes''' are the standard [[Medical terminology|clinical terminology]] system used in [[General Practice]] in the United Kingdom. It supports detailed clinical encoding of multiple patient phenomena including: occupation; social circumstances; ethnicity and religion; clinical signs, symptoms and observations; laboratory tests and results; diagnoses; diagnostic, therapeutic or surgical procedures performed; and a variety of administrative items (e.g. whether a screening recall has been sent and by what communication modality, or whether an item of service fee has been claimed). It therefore includes but goes significantly beyond the expressivity of a [[diagnosis code|diagnosis coding]] system.▼
{{Use dmy dates|date=June 2019}}
▲'''Read codes''' are
==History==
Since its origins in the 1980s,<ref>{{cite journal|last=Benson
===
The first version was developed in the early 1980s by [[Dr James Read]], a Loughborough general medical practitioner.<ref name="BCS">{{cite web |vauthors=Bentley T, Price C, Brown P |title=Structural and lexical features of successive versions of the Read Codes |url=http://www.phcsg.org/main/pastconf/camb96/readcode.htm |work=The Proceedings of the 1996 Annual Conference of The Primary Health Care Specialist Group of the [[British Computer Society]] |date=13–15 September 1996 |
* each code was composed of four consecutive characters: first character 0-9, A-Z (excepting I and O), remaining three characters 0-9, A-Z/a-z (excepting i,I,o and O) plus up to three trailing period '.' characters
* the relative position of one code to another was represented through the code itself: [J...] is the common ancestor of all other codes with 'J' as the first character, and [J1..] in turn the common ancestor of all codes beginning 'J1'.
Because of its four character code structure,
===
4-Byte
A later extension of
A popular misconception is that all 4-Byte codes are also present in 5-Byte, where they will also carry the same meaning. Whilst in the majority of cases any 4-Byte code of the general form 'wxyz' will be equivalent to a 5-Byte code of the form 'wxyz.', there are notable exceptions. The 4-Byte code [E333 Fear of flying], for example, corresponds to 5-Byte [E202A Fear of flying]; no [E333.] code exists in 5-Byte
===NHS
In 1988 a joint conference of the [[Royal College of General Practitioners]] and the [[British Medical Association]] recommended standardisation of the system in general practice [[Electronic medical record|Electronic Medical Record (EMR)]] systems and the [[National Health Service]] mandated this in April 1999.<ref name="NHS-CfH">{{cite web |title=Frequently Asked Questions about Clinical Terms (The Read Codes) |url=http://www.connectingforhealth.nhs.uk/systemsandservices/data/readcodes/faqs/index_html#1 |publisher=NHS Connecting for Health |
===
A third and more radically progressive version was devised through the 1990s in an attempt to address some of the more serious technical limitations of the earlier designs, including:
* Although codes remain 5-bytes in length, the hierarchical relationship between codes is no longer represented through the codes themselves but rather through a separate table listing all binary parent-child relations; this allows for a [[polyhierarchy]] of indefinite depth.
Line 39 ⟶ 41:
==Production and license==
In the 1990s the Read codes were released on a quarterly basis for clinical terms, and monthly for drugs and appliances.<ref>{{cite journal|last1=Robinson |first1=David |last2=Schulz |first2=Erich |last3=Brown |first3=Philip |last4=Price |first4=Colin |title= Updating the Read Codes. User-interactive Maintenance of a Dynamic Clinical Vocabulary |journal=Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association |volume=4 |issue=6 |date=1997 |pages=465–472 |doi=10.1136/jamia.1997.0040465|pmid=9391934 |pmc=61264 |doi-access=free }}</ref> Latterly, they were maintained by the UK Terminology Centre, a division within NHS Data Standards and Products (in turn a division of [[NHS Connecting for Health]]) and both versions were released biannually, in October and April, under the [[Open Government Licence]].<ref>{{cite web|url=https://data.gov.uk/dataset/f262aa32-9c4e-44f1-99eb-4900deada7a4/uk-read-code |title=UK Read Code |website=data.gov.uk |date=24 March 2015 |publisher=[[UK Government]] |access-date=18 March 2020}}</ref>
License application, and distribution, are now electronic only via the UKTC [https://www.uktcregistration.nss.cfh.nhs.uk Terminology Reference data Update Distribution] service.
==
[[SNOMED CT]] was created in 2001 out of a technical, editorial and content merger of CTV3 and [[Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine|SNOMED RT]], an American system. A significant part of the International Core content of SNOMED CT derives directly from CTV3; most of this content is identifiable as those SNOMED ConceptIDs where the CTV3ID column in the sct_concept table cites a code NOT beginning with the characters 'XU'.
Line 53:
==Deprecation and withdrawal==
In preparation for the whole English health system moving to SNOMED CT by April 2020, [[primary care]] systems
The former Information Standards Board for Health and Social Care (ISB) set December 2010 as the deprecation date for Read version 2, but did not set a date for its withdrawal at the time.<ref>{{cite web|title=Information Standards Notice
The deprecation and withdrawal time frame for Read version 3 was also agreed by the SCCI in August 2014. The deprecation date was set at 1 September 2014,<ref>{{cite web|title=Information Standards Notice
The Read Codes Drug and Appliance Dictionary (DAAD) was published for the final time on
==See also==
Line 65:
==References==
{{reflist
{{Medical classification}}
[[Category:National Health Service]]
[[Category:Diagnosis
[[Category:General practice]]
[[Category:Clinical procedure classification]]
|